10 Reasons Islam Is Not From God

[mensoft2003]

Whats there to report?? its about just some mohomed getting too hot in his head and going nuts ??

No its a warning to the admin not to walk in the sun .

 

[ex-muslim Ahmed]

Reason #2:

Islam cannot be from God because Muhammad's teaching does not pass the second test God gave for a prophet. Deuteronomy 13:1-4 tells us that no prophet will bring a revelation that is in conflict with previous revelation. His revelation must agree with the previous revelation of God. Deuteronomy 13:1-4

Deuteronomy 13:1-4, 1 If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder, 2 And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them; 3 Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul. 4 Ye shall walk after the LORD your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him.​

Muhammad’s revelation contradicts the previous revelations in both facts and principles. Consider the account of Joseph. In the Qur’an, Qur’an 12, Yusuf Beginning in Ayah 21.

Qur’an 12:21-34, 21. And the Egyptian who bought him said to his wife: Give him an honorable abode, maybe he will be useful to us, or we may adopt him as a son. And thus did We establish Yusuf in the land and that We might teach him the interpretation of sayings; and Allah is the master of His affair, but most people do not know. 22. And when he had attained his maturity, We gave him wisdom and knowledge: and thus do We reward those who do good. 23. And she in whose house he was sought to make himself yield (to her), and she made fast the doors and said: Come forward. He said: I seek Allah's refuge, surely my Lord made good my abode: Surely the unjust do not prosper. 24. And certainly she made for him, and he would have made for her, were it not that he had seen the manifest evidence of his Lord; thus (it was) that We might turn away from him evil and indecency, surely he was one of Our sincere servants. 25. And they both hastened to the door, and she rent his shirt from behind and they met her husband at the door. She said: What is the punishment of him who intends evil to your wife except imprisonment or a painful chastisement? 26. He said: She sought to make me yield (to her); and a witness of her own family bore witness: If his shirt is rent from front, she speaks the truth and he is one of the liars: 27. And if his shirt is rent from behind, she tells a lie and he is one of the truthful. 28. So when he saw his shirt rent from behind, he said: Surely it is a guile of you women; surely your guile is great: 29. O Yusuf! turn aside from this; and (O my wife)! ask forgiveness for your fault, surely you are one of the wrong-doers. 30. And women in the city said: The chiefs wife seeks her slave to yield himself (to her), surely he has affected her deeply with (his) love; most surely we see her in manifest error. 31. So when she heard of their sly talk she sent for them and prepared for them a repast, and gave each of them a knife, and said (to Yusuf): Come forth to them. So when they saw him, they deemed him great, and cut their hands (in amazement), and said: Remote is Allah (from imperfection); this is not a mortal; this is but a noble angel. 32. She said: This is he with respect to whom you blamed me, and certainly I sought his yielding himself (to me), but he abstained, and if he does not do what I bid him, he shall certainly be imprisoned, and he shall certainly be of those who are in a state of ignominy. 33. He said: My Lord! the prison house is dearer to me than that to which they invite me; and if Thou turn not away their device from me, I will yearn towards them and become (one) of the ignorant. 34. Thereupon his Lord accepted his prayer and turned away their guile from him; surely He is the Hearing, the Knowing.​

Now consider the same account from the Bible in Genesis 39:7-21

(Genesis 39:7-21, KJV) 7 And it came to pass after these things, that his master’s wife cast her eyes upon Joseph; and she said, Lie with me. 8 But he refused, and said unto his master’s wife, Behold, my master wotteth not what is with me in the house, and he hath committed all that he hath to my hand; 9 There is none greater in this house than I; neither hath he kept back any thing from me but thee, because thou art his wife: how then can I do this great wickedness, and sin against God? 10 And it came to pass, as she spake to Joseph day by day, that he hearkened not unto her, to lie by her, or to be with her. 11 And it came to pass about this time, that Joseph went into the house to do his business; and there was none of the men of the house there within. 12 And she caught him by his garment, saying, Lie with me: and he left his garment in her hand, and fled, and got him out. 13 And it came to pass, when she saw that he had left his garment in her hand, and was fled forth, 14 That she called unto the men of her house, and spake unto them, saying, See, he hath brought in an Hebrew unto us to mock us; he came in unto me to lie with me, and I cried with a loud voice: 15 And it came to pass, when he heard that I lifted up my voice and cried, that he left his garment with me, and fled, and got him out. 16 And she laid up his garment by her, until his lord came home. 17 And she spake unto him according to these words, saying, The Hebrew servant, which thou hast brought unto us, came in unto me to mock me: 18 And it came to pass, as I lifted up my voice and cried, that he left his garment with me, and fled out. 19 And it came to pass, when his master heard the words of his wife, which she spake unto him, saying, After this manner did thy servant to me; that his wrath was kindled. 20 And Joseph’s master took him, and put him into the prison, a place where the king’s prisoners were bound: and he was there in the prison.​

Consider the differences in the facts presented about the lives of the Biblical characters. In the Qur’an Potiphar was at the door when Joseph fled. He wasn’t at home in the Bible Account. In the Qur’an, Potiphar believed Joseph while in the Bible Potiphar believed his wife. In the Qur’an, Joseph requested that he be put in prison so that he might avoid the temptation of women and in the Bible, he was imprisoned by Potiphar for accosting his wife. Surely it is easy to see the differences. Joseph is just a sample. There are other contradictions in almost every account of the lives of Bible people. In the Qur’an, one of Noah’s sons died in the flood while in the Bible, all of them were on the ark. Compare the Biblical account of Lot with the Qur’an’s account of Lot (Lut in the Qur’an-NR). In the Qur’an, Abraham’s father was an idolater and forced Abraham to leave home for trying to teach monotheism, while the Biblical account has Abraham leaving after his father’s death.
Now consider just one principle that is set forth in the New Testament with the principles set forth in the Qur’an.

The New Testament, Matthew 5:44, But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;​

The Qur’an, Qur’an 61, the Ranks, Ayah 4. Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way in ranks as if they were a firm and compact wall​

The Qur’an, Qur’an 2, The Cow, Al Baqarah Ayah 190. And fight in the way of Allah with those who fight with you, and do not exceed the limits, surely Allah does not love those who exceed the limits. 191. And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers.​

What a contrast. Jesus says to love, forgive, and pray for your enemies. The Qur’an says to kill them. If that isn’t a different doctrine than what was revealed, nothing is.

 

[I love Srilanka]

My dear Ex muslim,You may stop your reasons & avoid wasting your times..as I told you earlier, 1st of all you have to prove that current bible is not corrupted, then you can quote the verses from Bible to disprove islam or prophet mohamed..you fool r so funny ...how can you take bible as a bench mark to recognize as to which is correct & wrong.

 

[AncientGlory]

Allah - the Moon God

The Archaeology of the Middle East

The religion of Islam has as its focus of worship a deity by the name of "Allah." The Muslims claim that Allah in pre-Islamic times was the biblical God of the Patriarchs, prophets, and apostles. The issue is thus one of continuity. Was "Allah" the biblical God or a pagan god in Arabia during pre-Islamic times? The Muslim's claim of continuity is essential to their attempt to convert Jews and Christians for if "Allah" is part of the flow of divine revelation in Scripture, then it is the next step in biblical religion. Thus we should all become Muslims. But, on the other hand, if Allah was a pre-Islamic pagan deity, then its core claim is refuted. Religious claims often fall before the results of hard sciences such as archeology. We can endlessly speculate about the past or go and dig it up and see what the evidence reveals. This is the only way to find out the truth concerning the origins of Allah. As we shall see, the hard evidence demonstrates that the god Allah was a pagan deity. In fact, he was the Moon-god who was married to the sun goddess and the stars were his daughters.

CONCLUSION

The pagan Arabs worshipped the Moon-god Allah by praying toward Mecca several times a day; making a pilgrimage to Mecca; running around the temple of the Moon-god called the Kabah; kissing the black stone; killing an animal in sacrifice to the Moon-god; throwing stones at the devil; fasting for the month which begins and ends with the crescent moon; giving alms to the poor, etc.

The Muslim's claim that Allah is the God of the Bible and that Islam arose from the religion of the prophets and apostles is refuted by solid, overwhelming archeological evidence. Islam is nothing more than a revival of the ancient Moon-god cult. It has taken the symbols, the rites, the ceremonies, and even the name of its god from the ancient pagan religion of the Moon-god. As such, it is sheer idolatry and must be rejected by all those who follow the Torah and Gospel. moongod.htm

Further information: thoroughly study the links in this file and also in The Cult of the Moon God The True Origin of 'Allah': The Archaeological Record Speaks The Vatican and Islam

There are no original concepts in Islam. Most concepts taken from Christianity and Judaism. It is very likely that some of them taken from other ideas already established in the arabic society. Useful information.

 

[AncientGlory]

My dear Ex muslim,You may stop your reasons & avoid wasting your times..as I told you earlier, 1st of all you have to prove that current bible is not corrupted, then you can quote the verses from Bible to disprove islam or prophet mohamed..you fool r so funny ...how can you take bible as a bench mark to recognize as to which is correct & wrong.

According to Islam bible is a previous revelation of GOD.

 

[sirajstc]

Now I realize how fool you are..no wonder why muslims are not replying to your comments..

 

[I love Srilanka]

According to Islam bible is a previous revelation of GOD.

yes you are correct.but current bible is corrupted. to explain you further in details

Four revelations of Allah are mentioned by name in the Qur’an: the Taurah, the Zaboor, the Injeel and the Qur’an.

Taurah, the revelation i.e. the Wahi given to Moosa (a. s.) i.e. Moses (pbuh).
Zaboor, the revelation i.e. the Wahi given to Dawood (a.s.) i.e. David (pbuh).
Injeel, the revelation i.e. the Wahi given to Isa (A.S.) ie. Jesus (pbuh).
‘Al-Qur’an’, the last and final Wahi i.e. revelation given to the last and final Messenger Muhammad (pbuh).

It is an article of faith for every Muslim to believe in all the Prophets of God and all revelations of God. However, the present day Bible has the first five books of the Old Testament attributed to Moses and the Psalms attributed to David. Moreover the New Testament or the four Gospels of the New Testament are not the Taurah, the Zaboor or the Injeel, which the Qur’an refers to. These books of the present day Bible may partly contain the word of God but these books are certainly not the exact, accurate and complete revelations given to the prophets.

 

[I love Srilanka]

Even with current bible,there are some versus refers to Mohammed.

01)John chapter 14 verse 16:
"And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you forever."

02)Gospel of John chapter 15 verse 26:
"But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me."

03)Gospel of John chapter 16 verse 7:
"Nevertheless I tell you the truth; it is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you".

04)Gospel of John chapter 16 verse 12-14:

"I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth is come, he will guide you unto all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. He shall glorify me".
The Sprit of Truth, spoken about in this prophecy refers to none other than Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)

whoever want to disprove prophet Mohammed, before he quote any verse from bible, he has to explain & clarify the above versus from the same bible.

 

[vjsam]

ehema kattiyage lokukam..

http://mohomad.blogspot.com/
http://www.dawahcorner.net/

mun hithanne munge eka hari pora kiyala. lamai ipa dena kotama laba hinsanaya.
6 4 nodanna podi ekage age kali kapanawa. mokakda a dahame thiyana wadagath kama.

 

[I love Srilanka]

http://mohomad.blogspot.com/
http://www.dawahcorner.net/

mun hithanne munge eka hari pora kiyala. lamai ipa dena kotama laba hinsanaya.
6 4 nodanna podi ekage age kali kapanawa. mokakda a dahame thiyana wadagath kama.

Boss Vjsam, Come on! talk politely with logical reason, without alleging musims as per your own knowledge. first of all present your subject with good reason in a good manner, then surely we are ready to answer you.

 

[AncientGlory]

These books of the present day Bible may partly contain the word of God but these books are certainly not the exact, accurate and complete revelations given to the prophets.

Who decides which part is accurate and which part is not?

 

[I love Srilanka]

Who decides which part is accurate and which part is not?

there are many absurdities and errors in the bible, anybody who reads the bible can easily understand. if u need , i can list it here..

Since we don't know which is correct and which is not, what we do is, we follow final revelation of God that is quran, but we do have faith on injeel & Jesus (Pbuh) as quran insist us, but we don't follow the current bible as it is corrupted & fabricated by their followers.

 

[AncientGlory]

there are many absurdities and errors in the bible, anybody who reads the bible can easily understand. if u need , i can list it here..

Since we don't know which is correct and which is not, what we do is, we follow final revelation of God that is quran, but we do have faith on injeel & Jesus (Pbuh) as quran insist us, but we don't follow the current bible as it is corrupted & fabricated by their followers.

I have read the bible no need to list anything here.

So it seems that you decides yourself that bible is erroneous? Same way the others say Qaran is erroneous?

What gives you the authority to decide which part of GODs revelation is accurate and which part is not?

So it seems that there's no way to interpret which part is correct and which part is not, other than the opinion of the reader, which of course is biased to his own belief. On these grounds there's no way to say that the above mentioned parts by the thread starter is Corrupted. There's no way to prove it other than just an individual opinion, yours in case is obviously to say it is wrong because you have a biased view supporting Islam. A christian will say it is correct. There's no way to know.

it seems that Ex Muslim Ahemed's claims should be given a consideration then.

 

[ex-muslim Ahmed]

http://mohomad.blogspot.com/
http://www.dawahcorner.net/

මුන් හිතන්නෙ මුන්ගෙ එක හරි පොර කියල. ලමයි ඉපදෙන කොටම ලැබෙන්නෙ හින්සනය.
6-4 නොඩන්න පොඩි එකාගෙ ඇඟේ කෑලි කපනව. මොකක්ඩ ඒ දහමේ තියන වැදගත්කම.

 

[ex-muslim Ahmed]

Question- If Bible is Corrupted How come Quran is not Corrupted?'

Answer- Because it says in the Quran it is not corrupted



Quran is corrupted since it is invalidated by science! period!

 

[I love Srilanka]

I have read the bible no need to list anything here.

So it seems that you decides yourself that bible is erroneous? Same way the others say Qaran is erroneous?

as we have clear cut examples in front of us, of course, we will decide our self it is corrupted, when the same way they falsely accuse quran is wrong, what we do is we prove it, but they don't have any answer. for example you can see Dr.zakir naik vs Dr.William champell debate.where Dr.William gave it up.


What gives you the authority to decide which part of GODs revelation is accurate and which part is not?
So it seems that there's no way to interpret which part is correct and which part is not, other than the opinion of the reader, which of course is biased to his own belief. On these grounds there's no way to say that the above mentioned parts by the thread starter is Corrupted. There's no way to prove it other than just an individual opinion, yours in case is obviously to say it is wrong because you have a biased view supporting Islam. A christian will say it is correct. There's no way to know.

No one need to give any authority to identify bible is correct or not, it is very clear cut, if you see the following you will understand, to understand this u don't need to be degree holder even, Grade 3 student even can understand, it can't be a God's words, i took only some simple examples without going in to scientific absurdities. if you don't agree this, I will treat you as another fool along with Ex muslim ahmed.

GE 1:11-12, 26-27 Trees were created before man was created.
GE 2:4-9 Man was created before trees were created.

NU 33:38 Aaron died on Mt. Hor.
DT 10:6 Aaron died in Mosera.

DT 6:15, 9:7-8, 29:20, 32:21 God is sometimes angry.
MT 5:22 Anger is a sin.

DT 30:11-20 It is possible to keep the law.
RO 3:20-23 It is not possible to keep the law.

NU 25:9 24,000 died in the plague.
1CO 10:8 23,000 died in the plague.

MT 25:34 Heaven was prepared before the Ascension of Jesus.
JN 14:2-3 It was prepared after the Ascension of Jesus.

GE 1:3-5 On the first day, God created light, then separated light and darkness.
GE 1:14-19 The sun (which separates night and day) wasn't created until the fourth day

GE 1:26-27 Man and woman were created at the same time.
GE 2:7, 21-22 Man was created first, woman sometime later.

My dear friend, I don't have bias view of supporting islam, perhaps you have against the islam.

it seems that Ex Muslim Ahemed's claims should be given a consideration then.

I'm sorry we rebut to what they say, we don't just keep on barking. how come you recommend ex mulim ahmed, as i heard everyone knows here he is a fool, hypocrite. if some one claims something, there should be some logic behind that, or at least he should be able to understand our answers or should be able to answer for our counter question, just keep on posting something from the anti islamic website, I don't think his Claims should be considered, all are nonsense, not worth to reply even.

 

[AncientGlory]

I'm sorry we rebut to what they say, we don't just keep on barking. how come you recommend ex mulim ahmed, as i heard everyone knows here he is a fool, hypocrite. if some one claims something, there should be some logic behind that, or at least he should be able to understand our answers or should be able to answer for our counter question, just keep on posting something from the anti islamic website, I don't think his Claims should be considered, all are nonsense, not worth to reply even.

Whether bible is correct or not is not the question. How did you identify the above mentioned specific part by ExMuslimAhemed to be corrupted?

Few facts to mention, the errors you point out in bible has been answered just like you try to answer the errors in qaran. Just like you christians are quite convinced that there are no errors. There's no point arguing about this.

Lets talk about Zakir Naik since you are a fan of him.

(1)Zakir Naik was the guy who said "Every muslim must be a terrorist" and got banned from entering UK recently.

(2)Many Muslims condemned him after his comments about battle of karbala

http://www.islamicinsights.com/news...kir-naik-draws-ire-with-karbala-comments.html

(3)In August 2008, Darul Uloom Deoband issued a fatwa against him.

(4)In 2008 the Lucknow-based cleric Abul Irfan Mian Firangi Mahali issued a fatwa against him.

(5) He was also banned from Toronto conference, after some comments about judaism.

(6).... The list continues, but I think the following muslim blog explains more of his achievements if anyone is interested.

http://agniveer.com/716/hate-zakir/


Why do you still bring out the name of this man who is a disgrace to Islam?

 

[I love Srilanka]

Whether bible is correct or not is not the question. How did you identify the above mentioned specific part by ExMuslimAhemed to be corrupted?

I need to counter question you, how can you identify What Ex muslim ahmed mentioned not corrupted??..so what we do is we don't follow the current bible 100%.now it very clear for you i hope.

Few facts to mention, the errors you point out in bible has been answered just like you try to answer the errors in qaran. Just like you christians are quite convinced that there are no errors. There's no point arguing about this.


mm!! which Christian answered can u mention me? what the answer they gave?? i dont want answer for thousand mistake which are in the bible, but i want only answer for the texts which i mentioned in my last post.


Lets talk about Zakir Naik since you are a fan of him.

you are diverting the subject now, its ok...1st of all you should understand, when some one become popular, it is natural that some one will gain supporters as well as opposition. yeah frankly, i used to watch his debates and speech often, rather than saying fan of him. because he is the only person who often come in my TV channel.

(1)Zakir Naik was the guy who said "Every muslim must be a terrorist" and got banned from entering UK recently.

So what? does it mean that Dr.Zakir really banned for causing terror. out of the current terrorists, how many of them terrified by Dr.Zakir, can u or Uk Gov't say?..I know very well who are the UK Gov't, same people who invaded a country(iraq) in the name of weapons of mass destruction, finally they found nothing.


(2)Many Muslims condemned him after his comments about battle of karbala

http://www.islamicinsights.com/news...kir-naik-draws-ire-with-karbala-comments.html

Yeah I heard, we are not here to talk about muslims here. in any community u can find many sects, there are some sect which don't like his speech. based on which you can't label Dr.zakir is a wrong person.


(3)In August 2008, Darul Uloom Deoband issued a fatwa against him.

frankly, I haven't heard about Darul uloom till now. I just heard some one issued a fatwa(opinion) against Dr.Zakir. for your information, this people may not act on behalf of the islamic people as whole in the world, maybe a organization incorporated by some people.I still further need to see about their responsibilities..also please note that, if some one give his opinion against some one cannot represent whole Muslim's opinion.

(4)In 2008 the Lucknow-based cleric Abul Irfan Mian Firangi Mahali issued a fatwa against him.

I dont know who is this cleric, anyone who issue fatwa for any reasons is not binding in islam. who knows for what reson he did so? who knows he is belong to which sect.mind all the muslims are not representing islam for their act.

(5) He was also banned from Toronto conference, after some comments about judaism.

of course if some one say the truth, naturally it is expected, even tomorow in srilanka,if he say budhdha is not the one to be followed, there is a chance that SL also can ban him. just bec of that can we say he is a wrong person.


(6).... The list continues, but I think the following muslim blog explains more of his achievements if anyone is interested.

http://agniveer.com/716/hate-zakir/


I answered for above, so i hope this blog also similar to what u mentioned in above.why you guys always get to know about Dr.Zakir naik negative matters easily, why don't u know about this,Dr Zakir Naik among the 100 Most Powerful Indians, it is neither Abul Irfan Mian Firangi Mahali nor any cleric from darululoomdeoband who issued fatwa.
http://www.alqalam.co.za/index.php?...ndians&catid=54:international-news&Itemid=116

Why do you still bring out the name of this man who is a disgrace to Islam?

Even if u take mahadhma ghandi, you will find many who support him, also against him as well.based on the people who against him can we say he is wrong person and disgrace for india..
As far as i understand this is the work of anti Islamic who don't want some one to talk against their faith and rebut their question against the islam. they always want to the islam to be under their foot.but by the Grace of Allah, some one will be there to answer them, earlier Ahemed deedat, now Zakir, may be some one else after Zakir.

 

[AncientGlory]

I need to counter question you, how can you identify What Ex muslim ahmed mentioned not corrupted??..so what we do is we don't follow the current bible 100%.now it very clear for you i hope

I'm not claiming anything. You are the one who said it is corrupted so you should back up your claim. I'm just saying according to you only some parts of bible is corrupted so there's no way to say what Ex muslim Ahmed is saying is false.

mm!! which Christian answered can u mention me? what the answer they gave?? i dont want answer for thousand mistake which are in the bible, but i want only answer for the texts which i mentioned in my last post.

http://www.apocalipsis.org/difficulties/trees.htm

Google the rest. I hope you wouldn't be arrogant enough to pin point the errors in the given article. My point is made not to argue about the errors but to point out that both Muslims and Christians have answers and they believe them.

So what? does it mean that Dr.Zakir really banned for causing terror. out of the current terrorists, how many of them terrified by Dr.Zakir, can u or Uk Gov't say?..I know very well who are the UK Gov't, same people who invaded a country(iraq) in the name of weapons of mass destruction, finally they found nothing.

He was not banned for causing terror. He was banned for promoting it. He said "Every muslim must be a terrorist". It seems that you support the claim. No use in discussing this matter further.

As far as i understand this is the work of anti Islamic who don't want some one to talk against their faith and rebut their question against the islam. they always want to the islam to be under their foot.but by the Grace of Allah, some one will be there to answer them, earlier Ahemed deedat, now Zakir, may be some one else after Zakir.

All links I provided are from different muslim sites and some sources from wikipedia. You obviously did not take a look.

 

[I love Srilanka]

I'm not claiming anything. You are the one who said it is corrupted so you should back up your claim. I'm just saying according to you only some parts of bible is corrupted so there's no way to say what Ex muslim Ahmed is saying is false.

Yes.I claimed, what I said was, there are many clear cut contradiction in the bible, so how can you rely on the whole book. that is why, we don't consider the bible to be the divine revelation of God. So I don't trust as whole, apart from having faith on the Injeel. Original version of injeel is corrupted, if I tell you this you will not accept, as I’m a Muslim, but see the evidence from Christians themselves, decide still are you going to argue on behalf of them? .
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article574768.ece
fiction exist. http://carm.org/what-bible
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark%2016:9-20;&version=NIV;
Also, CNN July 2008 and 2009(which i couldnt attach here) give me your email id.i will send u


http://www.apocalipsis.org/difficulties/trees.htm
Google the rest. I hope you wouldn't be arrogant enough to pin point the errors in the given article. My point is made not to argue about the errors but to point out that both Muslims and Christians have answers and they believe them.

As you quoted, they may lie with some reason to hide bible mistakes such as Genesis 2:4 refers to the account of when the land was created in the garden of Eden in paradise, whereas Genesis 1 refers to the creations of the heavens and the Earth." Please note that Genesis 2:4 says: "This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created." This doesn't refer to the heavens and garden of Eden! It refers to the heavens and the Earth which Genesis 1 shows that were created. This refutation is therefore invalid.
Some Christians may say: "In Genesis 2:5, "shrub of the field" only refers to domestic plants, whereas Genesis 1:11-12 does not." The Hebrew word used in Genesis 2:5 for "field" is "sadeh." (*) "Please note that the SAME Hebrew word is used in Genesis 2:19 to describe the animals that Adam named. Does that mean he only named domestic animals? According to the SAME standards, that means Genesis 2:19 refers to domestic animals. Moreover, Christians have NO proof to allege that Genesis 2:5 refers to domestic plants. They only have the Bible to rely on, NOTHING ELSE and this refutation is therefore invalid.
If you are still not convinced with what I say, ask any of your Christian friends to have poison & prove him he is the real Christian, surely I never heard someone tried this. I don’t think you did even. Gospel of Mark, Ch. No.16, Verse No.17 and 18 - It says that… ‘There will be signs for true believers and among the signs - In my name they shall cast out devils, they shall speak foreign tongues, new tongues, they shall take up serpents
And if they drink deadly poison, they shall not be harmed - And when they place their hand over the sick, they shall be cured.’
This is a scientific test - In scientific terminology, it is known as the ‘confirmatory test’ for a true Christian believer
He was not banned for causing terror. He was banned for promoting it. He said "Every muslim must be a terrorist". It seems that you support the claim. No use in discussing this matter further.

Ok for sake of argument let’s take he is promoting, thousands of people are following or hearing what Dr.Zakir says have you ever come across with someone / a terrorist who was promoted by Dr Zakir or he studied & passed out from Dr.Zakir ‘s School. I don’t think even I am acting as if a terrorist as I am fan of Dr.Zakir as u said, or how many of the bomb blast happened in Srilanka since he visited to srilanka.
He never promoted terrorism; if you want you may go back & watch the original video in which Dr.Naik addressed. maybe you watched the fabricated youtubes which was done by anti elements of Dr.Zakir. for further info, you can see in text what this website refers http://ilovezakirnaik.com/misconceptions/a05.htm
See unnecessarily you can’t label someone as wrong, please provide enough proof before you say some one wrong. If someone really wrong I will say wrong, Im not going to argue infavour of any person who promote terror. After all I’m a muslim, my faith never allows that.