well, u guys have some points, yes intel's Core 2 is faster even on a old Technology such as FSB simply because core2s have superior performing architecture than a K8, and simply none of these processors can utilize the full bandwidth of a HT bus completely. but my point is that AMD took that...
wrong buddy Windows 98 is utterly slower than XP, its multitasking was one of the worst in the industry, XP doenst use more than 90MB in standard installation, VIsta use 700MB on fist boot how abt that, vista is BLoated and slow
loooool now thats a sad story how can vista be speedier if it needs more hardware requirements than XP, My PC scores 5.7 on vista and is more than enough to run it with all the bells and whistles but even on my machine Vista is some times 50% slower than XP, almost all the games run slower on...
LMAO...actuall MSI boards are good, i used a K8T Neo FSR for three years and it was a joy, now its being used by one of my friends and it has never failed, and they include a lot of stuff with their boards,
well thats awesome news considering the penryns will drop in price...will never buy a conroe again...and the last intel ill be buying is a penryn llool...cuz the A-holes gonna lock overclocking on LGA1060
well that almost sounds like a insult...it seems u never lived the stone age lool cuz one have to know the stone age to comment on present, AMD kicked intel ass for almost 5 years before intel came up with Core 2 (with the original Athlon then Athlon XP and then Athlon 64), remember if it wasnt...