Latest ads

Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search

Search results

  1. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    how rupa is harming?
  2. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    yes, thats why it was called a biting snake...COZ, he does bit when touching..
  3. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    does the snake bite when you are away?
  4. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    from my understaning self it there only with clinging. if you see othrwise...good luck didnt you see i said snake is harmful... ------ Post added on 1783100547
  5. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    there is no other part... burning nature - dukka nature burning (in action) - causing dukka/harming
  6. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    go study paticcasampuada 101 n come back...you need to learn some basics.. thats the problem here..
  7. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    biting nature - harmfulness biting (in action) - harming if you dont understand the difference, i dont know what to say... :(
  8. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    if you undersand what i say you see it doesnt disagree with what buddha said.. i didnt say clinging only bring harming... you are just going after words instead of whole picture when clinging is there...self is there..self is there sansara is there... dukka is there...
  9. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    snake is harmful by its nature... coz he CAN n bite/ he has tendency to bite (this fact does not change depending on the person) BUT he bites only when you touch... (doesnt cause any sorrow to the person who doesnt touch) harmfulness - universal fact harming - depends on the person
  10. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    dont you create an identity when you say harming instead of not harming? you need to get the idea.. not how I say it...
  11. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    you need to understand why they are called harmful.. harmful doesnt mean they are harming by its nature..
  12. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    yes, whole web is fire/burning. but causes no sarrow/dukka unless avijja is present
  13. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    yes, with avijjas presence... clinging present when clinging present, me/i, dukkka (hurting/burning) present. when avijja is absent, clinging (touching) is absent...when cliging is absent.. me/i, dukka (hurting/burning) absent... no entity..no person, no you. nothing seperate created...
  14. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    explain pls..
  15. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    mara/fire has harmful NATURE...coz, if you touch you get burned... NATURE itself is not a harm
  16. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    there is no entity/you of clinging... avijja conditions clinging. avijja->sankara->.............->upadana(clinging) no harm: no dukka(emotional) unless clinging happens
  17. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    there is no separate lakkana cup being fire/mara is the lakkana... mara/fire itself has no harm unless you touch it..
  18. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    we are talking two dukkas here.. dukka as feeling/emotions and dukka as lakkana.. lakkana is a nature, not dukka (feeling) cliging to skandas (with dukka lakkana) cause dukka (feeling)
  19. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    there is none other than (upaana)skandas...3 marks are how they behave....
  20. E

    අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

    intrinsic properties OF upadanaskanda

    No contents
Top Bottom