oka atta. loke gola karai nam muhude wathura kohomada eka thana tiyenne. diya eli wala wathura haras athata yanna one. loke fat
නැව ගැට්ටට ගිහින් වැටෙනව* මේ මොකක්වත් ඕනෙ නෑ, දුරේක්ෂයක් අරන් වරායක් ළඟට ගිහින් ක්ෂිතිජය ළඟදි නැව් වලට මොකද වෙන්නෙ කියලා බලපන්. ලෝකෙ පැතලියි නම් නැව් නිකම්ම ටික ටික මීදුමක් වගේ අතුරුදන් වෙලා යන්න ඕනෙ. ඒත් එහෙම වෙන්නෙ නෑනෙ. නැව ටික ටික ගිලෙනවා වගේ පේන්නෙ.
All the relevant verses are there in the video.
the illustrations they made is using the information found in the Bible.
People have already done thorough analysis on those information.
Like I said, asking for the exact phrase that says “earth is flat” or “bible is not a geographical book” is a pathetic attempt to defend the book.
you can also tag me if you find anywhere the Bible says “earth is spherical”. Or even any scientific fact about earth or cosmology.
you're the one who's saying the bible states earth is flat. So you have to prove it. Not other way around..it is stupid logic lol
(given that it never states so as a fact) 
you're the one who's saying the bible states earth is flat. So you have to prove it.
Bible never has to state the earth is spherical. Why is it even necessary??
Its proven. We aren't the first people to talk about bible's description of the earth.
That's what you will find in those links.
But, when someone tries to point at incorrect facts in the Bible about the earth and the universe, the thing you hear from a Sri Lankan catholic is "show me the exact phrase" or the videos on YouTube or the links you find from google search is not up to standard kind of arguments. At that time, no one was advance enough to ask the question and bible wasn't advance enough to answer the question either. But there are facts indicating an incorrect model of the universe/earth. This is the fact.
If you want to have a look at it from an open minded perspective, you can see those quoted phrases in the links I posted and think whether they are correct or not. But this is entirely up to you.
This is entirely sounds pathetic and lame bn.
The exact kind of words you hear these days from catholics in the 3rd world.
Imagine, by any chance, if the Bible contains a phrase that clearly describe a modern scientific fact, then will you say the same thing?
Of course, the Bible talks about the creation of the universe and everything. One has the right to criticize is accuracy too.
Well, that's it. I think this conversation is now going in circles.![]()
Its proven. We aren't the first people to talk about bible's description of the earth.
That's what you will find in those links.
But, when someone tries to point at incorrect facts in the Bible about the earth and the universe, the thing you hear from a Sri Lankan catholic is "show me the exact phrase" or the videos on YouTube or the links you find from google search is not up to standard kind of arguments. At that time, no one was advance enough to ask the question and bible wasn't advance enough to answer the question either. But there are facts indicating an incorrect model of the universe/earth. This is the fact.
If you want to have a look at it from an open minded perspective, you can see those quoted phrases in the links I posted and think whether they are correct or not. But this is entirely up to you.
This is entirely sounds pathetic and lame bn.
The exact kind of words you hear these days from catholics in the 3rd world.
Imagine, by any chance, if the Bible contains a phrase that clearly describe a modern scientific fact, then will you say the same thing?
Of course, the Bible talks about the creation of the universe and everything. One has the right to criticize is accuracy too.
Well, that's it. I think this conversation is now going in circles.![]()
that's why i said you are based.සඳේ ආකර්ෂණය නිසා පොළවේ ඇතිවන උදම් සාගරයට විතරක් නොවෙයි බලපාන්නේ, පෘතුවි පෘෂ්ඨය පුරාම බලපානවා, වෙල්කම් ටු එර්ත් ඩොකියුමෙන්ටරි එකේ තිබ්බ නිව්යෝක් නගරය දවසකට දෙවතාවක් අඟල් 14 ඉහළට පහළට ගමන් කරනවා කියල, ඉතින් සඳ නිසාත් පොළොවේ හැඩය ගෝලයක් නෙවෙයි. සුළඟ වුවත් පොළවේ හැඩය තීරණය කරනවා.
ගණිතමය විදියට බලද්දී පොලව ඉලිප්සොයිඩ් එකක්, ජියෝඉඩ් එක බලන්නේ පොලවේ ගුරුත්වාකර්ෂණ ශක්තියේ මාධ්යයන අගයට වඩා විචල්ය වෙන ස්ථාන අනුව, ගුරුත්වාකර්ෂණ බලපෑම අනුව අපට උස ගණනය කරන්න පුළුවන්, ඒ අගය ඉලිප්සොයිඩ් එකේ අගයට වඩා වෙනස් වෙන තැන් වලදී හදාගන්න 3D ඉමේජ් එක තමයි ජියෝඉඩ් එකක් කියල කියන්නේ. එවරස්ට් මීටර් 8000 උසයි, මරියානා අගාධය මීටර් 11000 ගැඹුරුයි, හවායි මවුනා කි එවරස්ට් එකටත් වඩා උසයි අපි එකේ පාදමේ ඉඳල බැලුවොත්. ඉතින් පොළොව ගෝලයක් නෙවෙයි. ඒ වගේම කඳු සහිත ස්ථාන වල ස්කන්ධය ඉහළයි, ගුරුත්වාකර්ෂණ බලය වැඩියි, මෙහි ප්රතිවිරුධය ත් ඒ විදියමයි, මේක බලන්න නම් පොලවේ සාමාන්ය ඇසින් සාමාන්ය කැමරා එකකින් බලන්න බෑ. එක නිසයි ගුරුත්වාකර්ෂණ බලයේ විචල්යය යොදාගෙන තියෙන්නේ.
