යුධ අපරාධ විභාග කරන්න මම ඉඩ දෙන්නෙ නෑ.

[donDuminda]

පාලකයො අවිචාරවත් උණාම
රටවැසියො අවිචාරවත් වෙන බව
බුදුහාමුදුරුවොත් කියල තියනවා.




________________________
ඉධ තප්පති පෙච්ච තප්පති
පාපකාරී උභයත්ථ තප්පති
දැනුත් තැවෙයි, පසුවත් තැවෙයි.
පව්කාරයා දෙතැන්හිම තැවෙයි.
-බුදුන් වහන්සේ-

​

ane manda uba wage gembek....

 

[diamonddrago]

Bumping for athula uncle's bite.....XD

​

 

[AtulaSiriwardane]

Uba mokatada frustration kiyanne??? uba kiyanne eka ekaata oona oona widihata natanna kiyalada??? ane ubala wage gon thadiyoo....ubawath lankaawe thiyanna watin naa

What a frustration.



​

 

[AtulaSiriwardane]

Bumping for athula uncle's bite.....XD


​

Thanks a lot.

​

 

[AtulaSiriwardane]

ඔන්න ලංකාවටත් යුධ අධිකරණයක්.

ලංකාව ඉතින් නොකරපු වැරදි වලටත් යුධ අධිකරණ හදන
හරිම නීති ගරුක, හරිම සාධාරණ රටක් නිසා
බෑන්ටත් හිතෙන්න ඇති
මේක කොහොම හරි කරන්න ඕන කියලා.


දැන් ඉතින් කාල වරෙල්ලකො.



Ban hits out at Sri Lanka

Wednesday, 17 March 2010 04:50
( 17 Votes )

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon dismissed on Tuesday objections by Sri Lanka to his plan to establish a panel to look into possible human rights abuses there and said he would set it up without delay.


Ban told a news conference
he was within his rights to appoint the commission of experts
to probe possible violations during Sri Lanka's civil war
despite a complaint from President Mahinda Rajapaksa
this month that the move was unwarranted.

The UN chief also rejected
as based on a "misunderstanding"
a letter from non-aligned countries
at the United Nations charging
that he was exceeding his authority.

Ban said the appointment of the UN panel accorded with a joint statement with Sri Lanka
issued after he visited Sri Lanka just after the end of the war last May.

"The panel I am establishing will advise me on the standards, benchmarks and parameters
based on international experience that must guide any accountability process
such as the one mentioned in the joint statement," he said.

"I am convinced that it is well within my power as the secretary-general of the United Nations
to ask such a body to furnish me with advice of this nature," he said,
adding that the group would report to him directly.
"This does not in any way infringe on the sovereignty of Sri Lanka."

A statement issued by President Mahinda Rajapaksa's office on March 6
said the panel would be perceived as interference with the campaign
for an April 8 general election and
"would compel Sri Lanka to take necessary and appropriate action in that regard."

Ban said that despite the Sri Lankan objection
and the non-aligned countries' letter there would be "no delay" in the establishment of the panel.
He gave no further details of when it would be set up or who would serve on it.
(Reuters)

​

 

[tharinda76]

ඔන්න ලංකාවටත් යුධ අධිකරණයක්.

ලංකාව ඉතින් නොකරපු වැරදි වලටත් යුධ අධිකරණ හදන
හරිම නීති ගරුක, හරිම සාධාරණ රටක් නිසා
බෑන්ටත් හිතෙන්න ඇති
මේක කොහොම හරි කරන්න ඕන කියලා.


දැන් ඉතින් කාල වරෙල්ලකො.



Ban hits out at Sri Lanka

Wednesday, 17 March 2010 04:50
( 17 Votes )

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon dismissed on Tuesday objections by Sri Lanka to his plan to establish a panel to look into possible human rights abuses there and said he would set it up without delay.


Ban told a news conference he was within his rights to appoint the commission of experts to probe possible violations during Sri Lanka's civil war despite a complaint from President Mahinda Rajapaksa this month that the move was unwarranted.

The UN chief also rejected as based on a "misunderstanding" a letter from non-aligned countries at the United Nations charging that he was exceeding his authority.

Ban said the appointment of the UN panel accorded with a joint statement with Sri Lanka issued after he visited Sri Lanka just after the end of the war last May.

"The panel I am establishing will advise me on the standards, benchmarks and parameters based on international experience that must guide any accountability process such as the one mentioned in the joint statement," he said.

"I am convinced that it is well within my power as the secretary-general of the United Nations to ask such a body to furnish me with advice of this nature," he said, adding that the group would report to him directly. "This does not in any way infringe on the sovereignty of Sri Lanka."

A statement issued by President Mahinda Rajapaksa's office on March 6 said the panel would be perceived as interference with the campaign for an April 8 general election and "would compel Sri Lanka to take necessary and appropriate action in that regard."

Ban said that despite the Sri Lankan objection and the non-aligned countries' letter there would be "no delay" in the establishment of the panel. He gave no further details of when it would be set up or who would serve on it.
(Reuters)

​

mokadda ban athulayo den wela thiyenne ?? mei news eka eththada ? ammata hudu yuda adikaranayak dannada yanne SL walata wiruddawa ?? poddak explain karapan ..

 

[AtulaSiriwardane]

mokadda ban athulayo den wela thiyenne ?? mei news eka eththada ? ammata hudu yuda adikaranayak dannada yanne SL walata wiruddawa ?? poddak explain karapan ..

Me patangaththaa witharayi.

Lankawa UN ekata aadarshayak deelane thiyenne.


​

 

[x-pert]

What a frustration.

​

What is the frustration here mate?

Guerrilla wars have never been won by playing by the book.
Can Prabhaharan testify in a military court for killing innocent civilians?
Aren't you frustrated with that?

Definitely there could be war crimes. But they were required to end the blood bath! Army couldn't have killed Prabha if they were playing by the book. In that case, the war would have never finished.

 

[AtulaSiriwardane]

What is the frustration here mate?

Guerrilla wars have neven been won by playing by the book.
Can Prabhaharan testify in a military court for killing innocent civilians?
Aren't you frustrated with that?

Definitely there were war crimes - no doubt.
But they were required to end the blood bath! Army couldn't have killed Prabha if they were playing by the book. In that case, the war would have never finished.

Then,
paying for the war crimes
at an international court
without hiding behind the ignorant public,
is another heroic act
which they should jump at.

A real hero takes responsibility
for what he does.


​

 

[numesh]

WTF

 

[tharinda76]

Me patangaththaa witharayi.

Lankawa UN ekata aadarshayak deelane thiyenne.


​

baila epa ban... meka eththa news ekak da kiyapan ? source ???

 

[x-pert]

Then,
paying for the war crimes
at an international court
without hiding behind the ignorant public,
is another heroic act
which they should jump at.

A real hero takes responsibility
for what he does.


​

'War Crimes' is a matter of perspective actually.

Some may consider 'killing a captured terrorist' as a war crime. But it is something 'required' to end the war.

Geneva Convention was established in 1949 aftermath of World War II. There were no huge threat from 'terrorists' at that time. Only invasive political agendas.

So Geneva convention might not relevant for the current situation.

However, Paying for the war crimes is not an heroic act. Because they are Crimes as it is. But the problem is are they really WAR CRIMES?
OR normal acts which ended war?

 

[AtulaSiriwardane]

baila epa ban... meka eththa news ekak da kiyapan ? source ???

http://www.dailymirror.lk/index.php/news/2420-ban-hits-out-at-sri-lanka.html
​

 

[x-pert]

Also, note that I changed my earlier reply.
I was stating something earlier in a definite sense which I don't have evidence to prove. So I changed it to align with the current.

 

[AtulaSiriwardane]

ෆොන්සේකාට තහනම් ගෝඨාභයට නොතහනම් මහින්දගේ “යකාගේ නීතිය” දේශීය 2010 මාර්තු 16 වෙනි අඟහරුවාදා, 12:25

ආරක්ෂක ලේකම් ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා මේ වන විට එක්සත් ජනතා නිදහස් සන්ධානයේ මැතිවරණ මේදිකාවල ප්‍රධාන කථිකයෙකු වී ඇති බවත්, ඔහු එකස්ත් ජනතා නිදහස් සන්ධානයේ ජයග්‍රහණය වෙනුවෙන් මැතිවරණ ප්‍රචාරක කටයුතුවල නියැලෙමින් සිටන බවත් වාර්තා වේ. පසුගිය 14 දා ආරක්ෂක ලේකම් ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ විසින් එක්සත් ජනතා නිදහස් සන්ධානයේ කොළඹ දිස්ත්‍රික් අපේක්ෂක දුමින්ද සිල්වාගේ මැතිවරණ රැලි 09 කට සහභාගී වී ඇති අතර, ඒ සෑම අවස්ථාවකදීම දුමින්ද සිල්වා මෙවර මනාප ලැයිස්තුවේ අංක 1 ට ගෙන එන ලෙද ඉල්ලා ඇත.

ආරක්ෂක ලේකම්වරයා මෙසේ 14 වැනි දින දුමින්ද සිල්වාගේ මැතිවරණ රැලි 09 කට සහභාගී වූ බව අනාවරණය වූයේ දුමින්ද සිල්වාගේ සොයුරාගේ ගුවන් විදුලි නාලිකාව වූ හිරු FM නාලිකාවේ 14 වැනි දින ප්‍රවෘත්ති ප්‍රකාශයේ ප්‍රධාන සිරස්තලය එය වූ බැවිනි. මේ අනුව කොළොන්නාව රැස්වීම් 3 ක්, හෝමාගම රැස්වීම් දෙකක්, මහරගම, කැස්බෑව, උතුරු කොළඹ, කොට්ටේ යන නගරවැල පැවැති රැස්වීම් 09 කට ආරක්ෂක ලේකම්වරයා සහභාගී වූ බව හිරු FM නාලිකාවේ ප්‍රවෘත්ති විකාශයෙන් ප්‍රචාරය විය.

මෙහි ඇති ප්‍රධාතම ගැටළුව වන්නේ ආරක්ෂක ලේකම්වරයාගේ කථිකත්වය හෝ ඔහු එක්සත් ජනතා නිදහස් සන්ධානයට පක්ෂවීම හෝ නොවේ. මේ රටේ එකම නීතිය දෙදෙනෙකුට දෙයාකාරයට ක්‍රියාත්මකවීමයි.

අද දින යුධ අධිකරණයට ඉදිරිපත් කරන ජනරාල් සරත් ෆොන්සේකා මහතාට එරෙහිව නගා ඇති ප්‍රධාන චෝදනාව වන්නේ ඔහු යුධ හමුදාවේ සේවය කරන සමයේදී දේශපාලන පක්ෂ හා එහි නායකයින් සමඟ සබඳතා ඇති කර ගත් බවයි. ජනරාල්ට එරෙහිව මෙම චෝදනාව එල්ල කළ හැකි වන්නේ රාජ්‍ය පරිපාලන සේවයේ නිලධාරීන්ට හා ආරක්ෂක අංශයේ නිලධාරීන්ට දේශපාලනය කිරීම තහනම් වන බැවිනි. මේ අනුව ජනරාල් ආරක්ෂක සේවයේ නිලධාරියෙකු වන්නා සේම ආරක්ෂක ලේකම්වරයාද රාජ්‍ය පරාපාලන සේවයේ නිලධාරියෙකි.

නමුත් ජනරාල් සරත් ෆොන්සේකාට එරෙහිව ක්‍රියාත්මක වන්නාවූ නීතිය ආරක්ෂක ලේකම් ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂට එරෙහිව ක්‍රියාත්මක නොවන්නේ ඔහු රාජපක්ෂ පවු‍ලේ අයෙතු වීමත්, ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ එකකුස උපන් සොයුරාවීමත් නිසා දැයි විමසිය යුතුය.

 

[AtulaSiriwardane]

Some may consider 'killing a captured terrorist' as a war crime. But it is something 'required' to end the war.

Then why didn't they kill all the captured terrorists.
How does one can decide,
which CAPTURED terrorist should be killed
to end the war.
Why,
Capturing terrorists
wouldn't be enough to end war.
If a doctor can cure the wound
why does the idiot remove the leg?


Why a Govt commit war crimes
just like terrorists.

The answer is
that they are inhuman.

That is why intelligent people
of this country are against them.
It is not personal.

​

 

[AtulaSiriwardane]

Also, note that I changed my earlier reply.
I was stating something earlier in a definite sense which I don't have evidence to prove. So I changed it to align with the current.

That is fine.
People who know,
already know.

​

 

[AtulaSiriwardane]

'War Crimes' is a matter of perspective actually.

Some may consider 'killing a captured terrorist' as a war crime. But it is something 'required' to end the war.

Geneva Convention was established in 1949 aftermath of World War II. There were no huge threat from 'terrorists' at that time. Only invasive political agendas.

So Geneva convention might not relevant for the current situation.

However, Paying for the war crimes is not an heroic act. Because they are Crimes as it is. But the problem is are they really WAR CRIMES?
OR normal acts which ended war?

Just think of yourself.
When you are surrendered to a Govt,
which has a humane procedure to punish you,
if it kills you without a trial,
is it a humane Govt.
Isn't it a crime.
Which officer or a soldier,
even the president can judge you
when you are surrendered.

Geneva Convention
should be more humane now than then.



​

 

[x-pert]

Then why didn't they kill all the captured terrorists.
How does one can decide,
which CAPTURED terrorist should be killed
to end the war.
Why,
Capturing terrorists
wouldn't be enough to end war.
If a doctor can cure the wound
why does the idiot remove the leg?


Why a Govt commit war crimes
just like terrorists.

The answer is
that they are inhuman.

That is why intelligent people
of this country are against them.
It is not personal.

​

Simple.

Who is more powerful? Who can make decisions?
An army soldier OR a General?

Killing all captured terrorists would be inhumane definitely
But killing the major decision makers or at least buying them was required to end the war.

Why do doctors sometimes amputate limbs?
Because if the leg cannot be cured, then the only way to save the patient is by removing the leg completely.

Same story here...
Since the conflict was too deep rooted, there was no way to cure it without cutting the main limb.

Intelligent people are against them not because of this. They are against because MR doesn't do anything to develop the country and just trying to develop them selves!

 

[AtulaSiriwardane]

'War Crimes' is a matter of perspective actually.

Some may consider 'killing a captured terrorist' as a war crime. But it is something 'required' to end the war.

Geneva Convention was established in 1949 aftermath of World War II. There were no huge threat from 'terrorists' at that time. Only invasive political agendas.

So Geneva convention might not relevant for the current situation.

However, Paying for the war crimes is not an heroic act. Because they are Crimes as it is. But the problem is are they really WAR CRIMES?
OR normal acts which ended war?

Paying for the war crimes is an heroic act
if the criminal defines the crime as patriotic.
That is the definition we hear.



​