සංස්කෘතිය vs කොට අැඳුම්

[redux]

but we have a moral obligation to promote good ideas. rising popular culture is gradually promoting shamelessness, drug abuse and many other harmful activities over good ones. promoting and holding high women, whom the only thing they can do is present themselves with little or no clothes before society, is one such harmful trend and if a counter culture didn't arise against this the day people consider marie curie as some random fool and kim kardashian as someone to follow is not far.

Typical Conservative in its virgin habitat. "Ask women to put some clothes on so that I don't get reminded of how sexless I am please"

 

[redux]

I think you have understood something I have said. You do not strike me as a fool even though you have some unknown, at least for me, personal issue with me. You do understand the side affects of promoting shamelessness as a virtue right ?

Shameleness for a virgin like you. People being given the choice to do what they want with their lives and bodies is truly fucking awesome. I understand how it can be frustrating for a sexless virgin like you, it must be truly depressing when you see all those beautiful women out there and you can't get laid. I understand your pain

 

[Pessimist]

Typical Conservative in its virgin habitat. "Ask women to put some clothes on so that I don't get reminded of how sexless I am please"

Is this your way of checking whether something is right or wrong ? conservatism has nothing to do with this. you might as well say i'm wrong to speak against, say, homicides because conservatives consider it as a crime ? You are attacking a straw man.

 

[Pessimist]

Shameleness for a virgin like you. People being given the choice to do what they want with their lives and bodies is truly fucking awesome. I understand how it can be frustrating for a sexless virgin like you, it must be truly depressing when you see all those beautiful women out there and you can't get laid. I understand your pain

then why don't you support their right to walk around completely naked ? It's their bodies and their choices.

 

[redux]

Is this your way of checking whether something is right or wrong ? conservatism has nothing to do with this. you might as well say i'm wrong to speak against, say, homicides because conservatives consider it as a crime ? You are attacking a straw man.

Your views are conservative as fuck, virgin. No I'm not strawmaning you. Reading a list of Logical Fallacies available on Wikipedia isn't enough you know, you need to read an actual logic book

 

[redux]

then why don't you support their right to walk around completely naked ? It's their bodies and their choices.

I totally do and I totally would!

 

[Pessimist]

Your views are conservative as fuck, virgin. No I'm not strawmaning you. Reading a list of Logical Fallacies available on Wikipedia isn't enough you know, you need to read an actual logic book

I might be conservative. But why should it have anything to do with this ?

 

[Pessimist]

I totally do and I totally would!

What about their right to promote ISIS and LTTE? Their bodies, their brains, their opinions right ?

 

[redux]

What about their right to promote ISIS and LTTE? Their bodies, their brains, their opinions right ?

No dumb fuck. Terrorism is a choice you make for others, not for yourself. You choose to kill someone, harm someone against their fucking will, are you truly this stupid?

 

[Pessimist]

No dumb fuck. Terrorism is a choice you make for others, not for yourself. You choose to kill someone, harm someone against their fucking will, are you truly this stupid?

I'm speaking about promoting just the ideas. All the suicide bombings and other attacks aside, isn't promoting those groups should be legal ? It's people's body and brain and they should have the right to put anything in their bodies right ?

 

[redux]

I'm speaking about promoting just the ideas. All the suicide bombings and other attacks aside, isn't promoting those groups should be legal ? It's people's body and brain and they should have the right to put anything in their bodies right ?

lol you're totally reaching here dumb virgin. You're comparing promoting terrorism to people having the right to wear what they want. You are truly the dumbest virgin I have ever seen

 

[Pessimist]

lol you're totally reaching here dumb virgin. You're comparing promoting terrorism to people having the right to wear what they want. You are truly the dumbest virgin I have ever seen

dude. all im asking is a simple question.
you say people should be free to do literally anything that doesn't physically harm others like walking around naked.
what I'm asking is given that promoting some terrorist group would not kill or harm anyone, should it be legal ?

 

[redux]

dude. all im asking is a simple question.
you say people should be free to do literally anything that doesn't physically harm others like walking around naked.
what I'm asking is given that promoting some terrorist group would not kill or harm anyone, should it be legal ?

Virgin. all im asking is a simple question.

What is the connection between personal attire choices and promoting terrorism

Explain virgin

 

[Pessimist]

Virgin. all im asking is a simple question.

What is the connection between personal attire choices and promoting terrorism

Explain virgin

according to you, something that doesn't have any harmful physical affects on other people cannot be considered as wrong.
Examples.
A walking around naked won't harm B
A showing his penis to B won't harm B.

So in a similar situation where A is promoting an idea, an extremist one that is. Given that the idea won't physically harm B or anybody else, shouldn't that be perfectly legal and supported as A's right ?

Have I made myself clear enough ?

 

[redux]

according to you, something that doesn't have any harmful physical affects on other people cannot be considered as wrong.
Examples.
A walking around naked won't harm B
A showing his penis to B won't harm B.

So in a similar situation where A is promoting an idea, an extremist one that is. Given that the idea won't physically harm B or anybody else, shouldn't that be perfectly legal and supported as A's right ?

Have I made myself clear enough ?

You dumb virgin, terrorism on its own is inherently harmful. If it's not harmful why is it called TERRORism? There is no such thing as a terrorist ideology that won't harm anyone. Get it through your thick skull yet? Gosh your arguments so fucking dumb.

The lengths that you're going to justify your own insecurities is truly amazing. "Women need to cover up because terrorism"- Pessimist the Virgin ,2018

 

[Pessimist]

You dumb virgin, terrorism on its own is inherently harmful. If it's not harmful why is it called TERRORism? There is no such thing as a terrorist ideology that won't harm anyone. Get it through your thick skull yet? Gosh your arguments so fucking dumb.

The lengths that you're going to justify your own insecurities is truly amazing. "Women need to cover up because terrorism"- Pessimist the Virgin ,2018

I have explicitly said it would not have any physical affects on anyone. you are willingly refuse to read that part. I think I have made my point clear.

Just because something doesn't have any harmful physical affects on others doesn't imply it should be promoted or it's a good thing.

I have clearly explained what harmful affects promoting shamelessness, drug abuse etc would have on society. You have willingly refuse to read that part too.

Just stating it again in case you have misunderstood it for the umpteenth time.

Just because some action doesn't have any harmful physical affects on society doesn't mean it's inherently good and should be promoted.

In more simple terms, just because something won't harm anybody else physically doesn't mean we should promote it.

 

[redux]

I have explicitly said it would not have any physical affects on anyone. you are willingly refuse to read that part. I think I have made my point clear.

Just because something doesn't have any harmful physical affects on others doesn't imply it should be promoted or it's a good thing.

I have clearly explained what harmful affects promoting shamelessness, drug abuse etc would have on society. You have willingly refuse to read that part too.

Just stating it again in case you have misunderstood it for the umpteenth time.

Just because some action doesn't have any harmful physical affects on society doesn't mean it's inherently good and should be promoted.

In more simple terms, just because something won't harm anybody else physically doesn't mean we should promote it.

How can a terrorist ideology NOT HAVE an effect on anyone else you dumb idiot?

Are you autistic by any chance? Because if you're I will stop verbally destroying you because it's just not fair

 

[Pessimist]

How can a terrorist ideology NOT HAVE an effect on anyone else you dumb idiot?

Are you autistic by any chance? Because if you're I will stop verbally destroying you because it's just not fair

How can promoting nakedness or shamelessness not have any affect on anyone ? I have clearly explained what affects this trend could have on society. Do I need to explain it again ? How many times ?

Being shameless to wear little or no clothes isn't a virtue. You can always wear what you like. It's just that your opinions wouldn't become suddenly important based on your outfit.

You, redux, perfectly understand no one would get stoned for wearing something they like. What you are doing is promoting it as a virtue and holding people who are shameless high. This does have harmful affects on society. Things that should be held high go unnoticed because of this stupid trend.

 

[redux]

How can promoting nakedness or shamelessness not have any affect on anyone ? I have clearly explained what affects this trend could have on society. Do I need to explain it again ? How many times ?

Being shameless to wear little or no clothes isn't a virtue. You can always wear what you like. It's just that your opinions wouldn't become suddenly important based on your outfit.

You, redux, perfectly understand no one would get stoned for wearing something they like. What you are doing is promoting it as a virtue and holding people who are shameless high. This does have harmful affects on society. Things that should be held high go unnoticed because of this stupid trend.

Autism confirmed!

 

[Pessimist]

Autism confirmed!

So this is what you have to say ?

I presented you with logical evidence of harmful affects promoting this trend would have on society.

I explained just because something won't have any physical affect on another person doesn't imply that act should be promoted.

And you have confirmed I'm autistic. I think I don't need to explains this matter any further. things are self explanatory by now.

I'll leave it here.

Dear Elakirians. Porn stars are porn stars. They should act with little or no clothes. Society need not be a pornography. Promote women who invent new ideas, new technologies. Promote women who solve problems. Promote women who go to space and promote women who write books.

Being able to walk around with little or no clothes is not something to be proud of. Neither is it a talent. Understand that promoting such women is harmful to society and a disgrace to women like madam curie.

Fight for a good cause.