ෆර්මාගේ අවසන් ගැටළුව

luxmen

Member
Jul 17, 2012
15,961
540
0
you, yourself says you prove the theorem, but anyone can see your flow of reasoning,

Any way you put it in the blog and listed many countries read your blog. does any body comments in your blog saying it is correct,? only you commented in your blog.
I PUT IT TO BLOG,YOUTUBE, AND VIXRA PUBLICATION ALSO. YOU CAN SEE ,ONE PERSON COMMENT ON IT AND I GAVE THE ANSWER TO HIM AND HE WAS SILENT. -------HOW MANY PEOPLE, SAID, MY PROOF IS WRONG???????????????????LOOKING MY PROOFS , PEOPLE IN ALL OVER THE WORLD, BUT HOW MANY PEOPLE , SAID ,IT IS WRONG ??????
 

luxmen

Member
Jul 17, 2012
15,961
540
0
The problem is you assume c=a+b, (substitute its minimum value c for a+b).

but there are infinite number of c which is not equal to c=a+b, to prove that the proof is valid you can't assume c=a+b, you should prove it for any value of c , not just c=a+b.
PLEASE SEE THE PROOF , AT THE START ,I STARTED C^n =a^n +b^n----------[A] this is a common fair equation. there are no limits or no fixing values.
 

mag123

Well-known member
  • Jan 20, 2008
    5,584
    1,792
    113
    I PUT IT TO BLOG,YOUTUBE, AND VIXRA PUBLICATION ALSO. YOU CAN SEE ,ONE PERSON COMMENT ON IT AND I GAVE THE ANSWER TO HIM AND HE WAS SILENT. -------HOW MANY PEOPLE, SAID, MY PROOF IS WRONG???????????????????LOOKING MY PROOFS , PEOPLE IN ALL OVER THE WORLD, BUT HOW MANY PEOPLE , SAID ,IT IS WRONG ??????

    those who write in this elakiri forum alone says your proof is flowed, now that you published this more than a year ago, but any body ever said this is correct ? and most people in elakiri says your proof has flows. If some one is silent after you said some thing that alone means he does not want to argue with you because you are a kind of person who do not see the truth, but say the same thing over and over again.
     

    luxmen

    Member
    Jul 17, 2012
    15,961
    540
    0
    those who write in this elakiri forum alone says your proof is flowed, now that you published this more than a year ago, but any body ever said this is correct ? and most people in elakiri says your proof has flows. If some one is silent after you said some thing that alone means he does not want to argue with you because you are a kind of person who do not see the truth, but say the same thing over and over again.
    Please give priority to Maths. Not to your thoughts or my thoughts or elakiri thoughts. WHAT EVER, IF YOU FORWARD , ACCORDING TO MATHS, THEN I ACCEPT, what I see here, when I gave a answer mathematically, they have to accept, and silent.
     

    mag123

    Well-known member
  • Jan 20, 2008
    5,584
    1,792
    113
    Just go to University of Colombo Mathamatics Department and meet Dr Dr. T. U. Hewage , Head of the Department or any other professor . He /they will tell you your proof is correct or not.
     

    luxmen

    Member
    Jul 17, 2012
    15,961
    540
    0
    VERY IMPORTANT--------MOST IMPORTANT PART FOR THIS MY PROOF NOW, I EXPOSE TO THE WORLD NOW . YOU CAN SEE FROM INEQUALITY [1] ----c^n/2 <a^n/2 + b^n/2--then from that inequality , I took when n=2, c<a+b---[2]----SO MY PROOF IS FOR WHEN c^2=a^2+b^2 then there can not be a,b,c whole numbers for n>2 for c^n=a^n+b^n [a,b,c common for any n there] . NOW LETS CONSIDER WHEN FOR ANY n when n is not equal to 2----c^n =a^n +b^n----[A]. You can take it as [c^n/2]^2=[a^n/2]^2 + [b^n/2]^2------[A] .SO there should be a^n/2 and b ^n/2 should be fractions[ALREADY PROVED].So a ^n/2 and b^n/2 should be fractions. FOR THAT a and b should be fractions. SO I PROVED FERMAT LAST THEOREM VERY CLEARLY.
     
    Last edited:

    inspiron

    Well-known member
  • May 27, 2014
    24,976
    17,608
    113
    Nowhere
    bajIAVL.jpg