Now you’re saying Tipitaka (Thripitakaya) and Mahavamsa prove that Buddha was born in Sri Lanka? WHERE?
Give us the exact verses—because guess what? Neither of these texts say that!
1. Let’s Expose Your Lies – What Does the Tipitaka Actually Say?
The Pali Canon (Tipitaka), the most sacred Buddhist scripture, clearly states:
"At that time in the Lumbini Grove, the Bodhisatta (Buddha) was born."
— Dīgha Nikāya, Mahāpadāna Sutta (DN 14)
"King Suddhodana ruled in Kapilavatthu. The queen gave birth in Lumbini, under a sal tree."
— Vinaya Pitaka, Mahavagga (Mv 1.6.9-10)
Where does it say ‘Sri Lanka’? NOWHERE!
2. What About the Mahavamsa?
You really shot yourself in the foot by bringing up Mahavamsa! Because Mahavamsa itself never says Buddha was born in Sri Lanka—it actually says:
"The Master, the Conqueror, the Lord of the World, passed into Nirvana in the city of Kusinara, having been born in the Lumbini Grove."
— Mahavamsa, Chapter 1
Again, WHERE does it say Sri Lanka? It DOESN’T!
3. You Just Proved Yourself Wrong
You challenged me to check Tipitaka and Mahavamsa, and I did—and they prove YOU wrong! You’re either: Lying without ever reading these books, or Completely misunderstanding them.
Either way, you have ZERO proof for your claim, while we have ancient scriptures, archaeology, and historical records proving Buddha was born in Lumbini, Nepal (then part of India).
So now, show us the exact verse from Tipitaka or Mahavamsa that says Buddha was born in Sri Lanka. Spoiler alert: You won’t find any, because it doesn’t exist!![]()
ඔබ දෙයක් දැනගැනිම උදෙසා නොවෙ අදහාස් ඉදිරිපත් කරන්නෙ, මන් විරයා අදහාසින් එම අදහාසෙ සිටින කෙනෙකු වෙත තොරතුරු ඉදිරිපත් කිරිම තෙරුමක් නැතැයි අදහාස,
ඔබට වැයහෙන විදියට තෙරුම් ගන්න,
