Another Claim for Room Temperature Superconductivity.

imhotep

Well-known member
  • Mar 29, 2017
    14,824
    8
    35,334
    113
    Researchers claim to have squeezed room temperature superconductivity out of a compound made of hydrogen, nitrogen and lutetium using diamond anvils.

    It’s a bold claim: The quest to create a superconductor that works under practical conditions is finally fulfilled, a team of researchers says. But controversy has dogged the team’s earlier claim of record-breaking superconductivity, suggesting the new result will face extreme scrutiny.

    Many materials become superconductors, able to transmit electricity with no resistance, provided they’re cooled to very low temperatures. A few superconductors work under warmer conditions, but those must be squeezed to crushing pressures, meaning they’re also impractical to use.

    Now researchers are saying they have created a superconductor that works at room temperature and relatively low pressure. A superconductor that operates under such commonplace conditions could herald a new age of high-efficiency machines, supersensitive instrumentation and revolutionary electronics.

    “This is the start of the new type of material that’s useful for practical applications,” Ranga Dias, a physicist at the University of Rochester in New York, said March 7 at the American Physical Society meeting.

    The team reported the new result with a material made of hydrogen, nitrogen and lutetium. Dias and colleagues blended the elements together in a device known as a diamond anvil cell. They then varied the pressure and measured the resistance to electrical flow in the compound.

    At temperatures as high as 294 kelvins (21° Celsius or 70° Fahrenheit), the material seemed to lose any resistance to electrical flow. It still required pressures of 10 kilobar, which is about 10,000 times the pressure of our atmosphere. But that’s far lower than the millions of atmospheres of pressure typically required for superconductors that operate near room temperature. If confirmed, that makes the material much more promising for real-world applications.

    PS: The research likely will face significant skepticism, in part because of the firestorm over the team’s earlier publication that claimed discovery of superconductivity in carbonaceous sulfur hydride at 15° C .
    Editors at Nature retracted that paper, over the objection of Dias and his coauthors, citing irregularities in the researchers’ data handling that undermined the editors’ confidence in the claims.
     

    imhotep

    Well-known member
  • Mar 29, 2017
    14,824
    8
    35,334
    113

    This was about two years ago when he first made the claim. But what I posted today was just made a day ago at the APS Meeting in Las Vegas.

    Superconductivity, one of most profound phenomenon in nature. However, this elusive quantum state has yet to revolutionize the world due to the low temperatures required. Consequently, ambient conditions superconductivity has become one of the most sought after goals of science since Kamerlingh Onnes’ first observation of superconductivity in elemental mercury at 4.2 kelvin over a century ago. Over the last decade, high pressure compression have dominated the search for high temperature superconductivity. Leading the way has been the “chemical precompression” of hydrogen dominant alloys demonstrating critical superconducting transition temperatures (Tc) approaching the freezing point of water in the rare earth hydrides LaH10 and YH9 at megabar pressures. Our discovery of room temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride highlighted that ternary or greater systems are likely the key to higher Tc’s and ambient conditions superconductivity. Here, we report a recent devlopments of new materials that exhibits superconductivity at near ambient conditions. These compounds were synthesized under high pressure-temperature conditions, and then after full recoverability its materials and superconducting properties are examined along compression pathways. With these material, the dawn of ambient superconductivity and applied technologies has arrived with a direct path now open for tailoring extreme science hydrides to “materials by design”.
     

    lovethebomb

    Well-known member
  • Apr 18, 2015
    4,728
    9,045
    113
    Not only the Carbonaceous SH one, Ranga's Europium RTSC study also faced serious data manipulation and plagiarism accusations, literally a cut-and-paste incident, which ultimately had to be retracted. The metallic hydrogen claim that came when they were at Harvard has yet to be reproduced either by a third party or by the publishers themselves. So that's 3 studies that are treated with high amount of distrust, 2 of which already retracted (Nature is to be blamed here too, their peer-review conduct through the past decade or so is becoming somewhat problematic).

    The incredulity displayed towards these aren't general wariness either. So far, mostly simulation and some theoretical work seem to suggest that RTSCs should not be possible for most structures- and this is particulary true for CSH, which is partly why people were so scandalized when it was first published in 2020-ish, I think.

    This is not my field per se so I hesistate to judge too harshly. But the baseline subtraction of one of the R vs T curves in this paper is weird, definitely nonchalant for a study that claims RT superconductivity (although one of my colleagues says it could sometimes be warranted for 4 probe measurements).

    I don't know man, these guys are either playing amateur hour (very unlikely) or on a career suicide mission. Dangerous game at the expense of their and the institute's reputation.

    I cannot stress this enough though, if an honest to god room T superconductivity is recorded by anyone, it will be the scientific breakthrough of the 21st century so far. It's such an incredible, almost too-good-to-be-true scenario. A Nobel would only just be a consolation prize.
     
    Last edited:

    imhotep

    Well-known member
  • Mar 29, 2017
    14,824
    8
    35,334
    113
    I hear that the paper has been retracted, correct me if I'm wrong
    His original paper on this topic was retracted in late December 2021. That's why I titled this Another Claim......

    The current claim is under scrutiny and based on nitrogen-doped lutetium hydride (NLH) unlike the previous one based on CSH. Let's see whether the claim holds.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: NRTG

    RealityOfX

    Well-known member
  • Feb 5, 2021
    8,445
    1
    14,494
    113
    I don't know how other acedamics react to this even though this is true. Most acedamics are envious and loads of politics in acedamic institutions and journals. Filled with institutional nepotism and racial biases too. Worst kind of people to work with since they have no experience in actual society and industry. just researchwork and coursework only. so Interpersonal skills are not upto the level of professionals and higher toxicity. some of them a behave in childish ways. Sometimes they work according to the theories of the book only. Cant and don't like to think outside of the box. So controversies will have with this eventhough this is legit.

    And other acedamics who are trying to achieve this for years, won't stay idle, because if this os true, then their years of expenses for this thing will become a waste
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: NRTG and imhotep