BEST AND WORST CITIES IN THE WORLD

fanci

Member
Nov 2, 2007
567
0
0
In the Middle of Nowhere
Quality of Living Global City Rankings 2008:



ZurichcityJune102008.jpgThe twin spires of the Grossmünster are a distinctive feature of Zurich’s cityscape: the popular panoramic view shows Zurich with Lake Zurich and the snow-capped Alps in the background. © Zurich Tourism/Manuel Bauer

* European cities dominate annual worldwide quality of living rankings
* Zurich scores highest for overall quality of living; Baghdad, the lowest
* Luxembourg ranks highest for personal safety; Baghdad, the lowest
* In UK, Glasgow (43) and Birmingham (53) rank safer than London (69)


European cities dominate the worldwide rankings of locations with the best quality of living, according to Mercer's 2008 Quality of Living Survey. Zurich retains its 2007 title as the highest ranked city, followed jointly by Vienna (2), Geneva (2), then Vancouver (4) and Auckland (5). Dublin has a worldwide rank of 25 and 8th place among European cities.

In the UK, London ranks 38, while Birmingham and Glasgow are jointly 56. The highest entry for the United States is Honolulu, appearing at number 28. The cities with the lowest quality of living ranking are Ndjamena (211), Khartoum (212), Brazzaville (213) and Bangui (214). Baghdad, ranking 215, retains its position at the bottom of the table.


Worldwide Quality of Living Survey 2008
Top 10 & Bottom 10

Base City: New York, USA (=100)

Rank 2008 Rank 2007 City Country Index 2008 Index 2007

The Best 10
1 1 ZURICH Switzerland 108 108.1
2 3 VIENNA Austria 107.9 107.7
2 2 GENEVA Switzerland 107.9 108.0
4 3 VANCOUVER Canada 107.6 107.7
5 5 AUCKLAND New Zealand 107.3 107.3
6 5 DUSSELDORF Germany 107.2 107.3
7 8 MUNICH Germany 107 106.9
7 7 FRANKFURT Germany 107 107.1
9 9 BERN Switzerland 106.5 106.5
10 9 SYDNEY Australia 106.3 106.5

204 Colombo Sri Lanka

The Worst 10

206 203 DHAKA Bangladesh 38.9 40.5
207 208 SANAA Yemen Arab Republic 38.2 38.2
207 208 PORT HARCOURT Nigeria 38.2 38.2
209 207 KINSHASA Dem. Rep. Of The Congo 36.3 38.3
210 211 POINTE NOIRE Congo 33 33.0
211 210 NDJAMENA Chad 32.9 34.0
212 212 KHARTOUM Sudan 31 31.0
213 214 BRAZZAVILLE Congo 29.5 29.5
214 213 BANGUI Central African Republic 29.3 30.6
215 215 BAGHDAD Iraq 13.5 14.5

Europe

Switzerland and Germany dominate the European cities with the best quality of living, each having three cities represented in the top 10. Bern, in Switzerland, ranks 9 following behind Zurich and Geneva. Dusseldorf (6), Munich and Frankfurt (both at 7) represent Germany. Outside the top 10 are Copenhagen (11), Amsterdam (13), Brussels (14), Berlin (16) and Luxembourg (17). Dublin, ranking 25, is followed by Paris (32), Barcelona (42) and Madrid (43). Lisbon is number 44 and is followed by Rome, 55, up from 61 in 2007. Prague (71) is the highest-ranking eastern European city followed by Budapest (74), Vilnius (78), Ljubljana (82) and Warsaw (85). The lowest ranking European city is Minsk (183) in Belarus. Minsk scores 49.4 on the index compared with Zurich's 108. Milan (41), Lisbon (44), Vilnius (78) and Riga (89) have also become more attractive destinations, rising markedly in the rankings since 2007.

The rankings of Bern, Geneva and Zurich, all at 2, confirm Switzerland's position as one of the safest countries in Europe. According to the index, Luxembourg, the European city with the highest level of personal safety, scores 131.4. This is in stark contrast with Moscow, the European city scoring the lowest at 37.7 (196). In the UK, Glasgow (43) and Birmingham (53) rank safer than London (69)

Asia Pacific

Auckland (5) is the city in Asia Pacific with the best quality of living, followed by Sydney (10) and Wellington (12). Elsewhere in Asia, Singapore (32) ranks two places higher than in 2007, slightly higher than Japanese cities such as Tokyo (35). Hong Kong and Beijing retain their 2007 rankings, respectively 70 and 116 in 2008. Bangalore (140) is India's most highly ranked city followed closely by Mumbai (142). Both have seen a marked improvement in their rankings since 2007. Elsewhere in Asia, Kuala Lumpur ranks 75, followed by Taipei (84), Seoul (86), Bangkok (109) and Jakarta (146). According to the index, Auckland, the city with the best quality of living in Asia Pacific, scores 107.3 while Dhaka, the city with the region's worst quality of living, scores 38.9.

For personal safety, Pakistan is one of the lowest-scoring destinations with Karachi, Islamabad and Lahore ranked 213, 203 and 192 respectively. Colombo in Sri Lanka appears at 204 while Dhaka (201), Jakarta (189) and Manila (178) are amongst the region's cities scoring lowest on personal safety. Singapore is the region's best location for personal safety, scoring 120.2 compared to Karachi's 25.3.

"Increased political stability and the growth of China and India have led to a broad improvement in the quality of living for expatriates in some of the major cities," commented Parakatil. "However, border conflicts and internal issues, combined with high levels of crime, make many other countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Indonesia less appealing relocation destinations."

Americas

Canadian cities dominate the rankings in the Americas. Vancouver (4) has the best quality of living followed by Toronto (15), Ottawa (19) and Montreal (22). In the US, after Honolulu (28) comes San Francisco (29), Boston (37) and Chicago (44). Washington, DC, ranks 44, above New York (49).

In Central and South America, San Juan in Puerto Rico retains the highest ranking at 72, followed by Montevideo at 76. Port au Prince in Haiti ranks lowest in the region at 202. In terms of the index, Vancouver scores 107.6 compared to Port au Prince's 39.8.

In terms of personal safety, Canadian cities again perform best with Calgary, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto and Vancouver all ranked jointly at 22. In the US, Chicago, Honolulu, Houston, Lexington, San Francisco and Winston-Salem all share rank 53. Elsewhere in the region, Santo Domingo has the highest ranking at 92 followed by Panama City (96) and Monterrey (99). Bogota (207) in Colombia has the lowest levels of personal safety. The Canadian cities score 115.8 compared to Bogota's 30.4.

Middle East and Africa

Cape Town (80) in South Africa and Port Louis in Mauritius are the region's cities with the best quality of living followed by Dubai (83) and Abu Dhabi (87). In contrast, Johannesburg slips from 90 in 2007 to 94 in 2008 and Harare in Zimbabwe slips from 168 in 2007 to 174. Out of the 25 lowest ranking cities, 19 are from Africa including Lagos (198), Port Harcourt (207) and Bangui (214). Two are from the Middle East including Sanaa (207) and Baghdad (215) - the city with the world's lowest quality of living and lowest levels of personal safety. Cape Town scores 87.9 compared to Baghdad's 13.5.

For personal safety, apart from Baghdad, Kinshasa is the worst location, ranked 214, and Nairobi (212). Lagos and Port Harcourt rank equally at 209. Jerusalem and Beirut both rank 199 and Harare, 184. Abu Dhabi (33) is the region's best city for personal safety, followed by Dubai (47), Port Louis (60). Lusaka and Manama rank equally at (118). According to the personal safety index, Abu Dhabi scores 112 against Baghdad's 3.8.

According to Parakatil, "Several regions of the Middle East have benefited enormously from government investment in infrastructure, health and sanitation and are rising up the rankings. However, personal safety and political tensions remain stumbling blocks and account for the low ranking of many of the region's cities. Multinationals often compensate for this by increasing compensation levels and other benefits for their employees.

However, at an individual level, an expat may well have a better quality of life in say Kuala Lumpur at 75 than Dublin at 25. For the same rent, an apartment in the high-income area in KL would be three times the size of one in Dublin and have access to swimming pool, gym etc on site. Besides, the cost of living, is much lower.

The orientation of the survey appears to be from a US/European perspective. Cold European winters would not be everyone's cup of tea!
 
Last edited:

ram4mira

Active member
  • Jan 14, 2007
    2,628
    17
    38
    36
    bt i love no 204 than any other cities mentioned......
    we have to bring that 204 to 001
     

    sri_lion

    Member
    Sep 14, 2006
    12,908
    102
    0
    Kuala Lumpur
    They take personal safety into account as well...that might have bought Colombo down in the ranks... we got like 2,3 bombing every week or so, thanx to Parayakaran :rolleyes: :frown: ...if not Colombo is way better than other cities in the region!!!
     

    kosandpol

    Well-known member
  • Jun 10, 2008
    45,329
    1,492
    113
    Also this list is based on the Quality of living. Colombo has a LONG way to go before making it to the top 100, let alone the top 10.
     

    fanci

    Member
    Nov 2, 2007
    567
    0
    0
    In the Middle of Nowhere
    sri_lion said:
    They take personal safety into account as well...that might have bought Colombo down in the ranks... we got like 2,3 bombing every week or so, thanx to Parayakaran :rolleyes: :frown: ...if not Colombo is way better than other cities in the region!!!

    Yes the security situation has adversely affected the downgrading of Colombo.

    According to this survey, their primary focus was how would these cities attract to expatriate workforce, as Personal and family safety is of paramount importance when employees consider opportunities overseas.

    Mercer's study is based on detailed assessments and evaluations of 39 key quality of living determinants, grouped in the following categories:

    *

    Political and social environment (political stability, crime, law enforcement, etc)
    *

    Economic environment (currency exchange regulations, banking services, etc)
    *

    Socio-cultural environment (censorship, limitations on personal freedom, etc)
    *

    Health and sanitation (medical supplies and services, infectious diseases, sewage, waste disposal, air pollution, etc)
    *

    Schools and education (standard and availability of international schools, etc)
    *

    Public services and transportation (electricity, water, public transport, traffic congestion, etc)
    *

    Recreation (restaurants, theatres, cinemas, sports and leisure, etc)
    *

    Consumer goods (availability of food/daily consumption items, cars, etc)
    *

    Housing (housing, household appliances, furniture, maintenance services, etc)
    *

    Natural environment (climate, record of natural disasters)

    However, at an individual level, an expat may well have a better quality of life in say Kuala Lumpur at 75 than Dublin at 25. For the same rent, an apartment in the high-income area in KL would be three times the size of one in Dublin and have access to swimming pool, gym etc on site. Besides, the cost of living, is much lower.

    Border conflicts and internal issues, combined with high levels of crime, make many other countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Indonesia less appealing relocation destinations."

    The orientation of the survey appears to be from a US/European perspective. Cold European winters would not be everyone's cup of tea!
     

    kosandpol

    Well-known member
  • Jun 10, 2008
    45,329
    1,492
    113
    fanci said:
    Yes the security situation has adversely affected the downgrading of Colombo
    But that's not the only thing. Even without the security situation, Colombo has a way to go to be on par with the better cities.
     

    sri_lion

    Member
    Sep 14, 2006
    12,908
    102
    0
    Kuala Lumpur
    fanci said:
    Without this problem, Colombo would have been one of the best in the region with every aspect!

    Yup.... ofcourse Colombo isn't even remotely there when comparing to the top cities... but in the region it must be one of the best for sure if we take out the security issues!
     

    kosandpol

    Well-known member
  • Jun 10, 2008
    45,329
    1,492
    113
    fanci said:
    Without this problem, Colombo would have been one of the best in the region with every aspect!
    I beg to differ on that point.
    Lets assume that there is no security situation, How then can it be one of the best in every aspect ? Colombo still has problems in managing waste water, managing waste, traffic, slums, hygiene, pollution among others.
     

    sri_lion

    Member
    Sep 14, 2006
    12,908
    102
    0
    Kuala Lumpur
    kosandpol said:
    I beg to differ on that point.
    Lets assume that there is no security situation, How then can it be one of the best in every aspect ? Colombo still has problems in managing waste water, managing waste, traffic, slums, hygiene, pollution among others.

    There's no point we are arguing blindly here.. because we do not know how the points are being distributed among those benchmarks to gain that particular rank!

    But if Mumbai and Jakarta can stay up there @ 140's Colombo should definitely be higher or on the same level with them!
     

    fanci

    Member
    Nov 2, 2007
    567
    0
    0
    In the Middle of Nowhere
    kosandpol said:
    I beg to differ on that point.
    Lets assume that there is no security situation, How then can it be one of the best in every aspect ? Colombo still has problems in managing waste water, managing waste, traffic, slums, hygiene, pollution among others.

    The colossal amount of money wasted on defense for last 20 years, would be use on development of the city infrastructure by any government. The economic stability in the country also gonna be thousand times better than today.
     

    kosandpol

    Well-known member
  • Jun 10, 2008
    45,329
    1,492
    113
    sri_lion said:
    There's no point we are arguing blindly here.. because we do not know how the points are being distributed among those benchmarks to gain that particular rank!

    But if Mumbai and Jakarta can stay up there @ 140's Colombo should definitely be higher or on the same level with them!

    Saying that just because mumbai and jakarta is up there at 140, Colombo should be higher up, is arguing blindly.
    Right now cost of living in Colombo is higher than that of Jakarta (Dunno about Mumbai) and facilities wise Jakarta again fairs better. Hygiene and pollution wise I pretty sure Colombo fair better. Night life and entertainment wise Jakarta is miles ahead.
    If Colombo can reach the standards of Singapore, then it'll certainly be higher up than jakarta or mumbai.
     

    fanci

    Member
    Nov 2, 2007
    567
    0
    0
    In the Middle of Nowhere
    kosandpol said:
    Saying that just because mumbai and jakarta is up there at 140, Colombo should be higher up, is arguing blindly.
    Right now cost of living in Colombo is higher than that of Jakarta (Dunno about Mumbai) and facilities wise Jakarta again fairs better. Hygiene and pollution wise I pretty sure Colombo fair better. Night life and entertainment wise Jakarta is miles ahead.
    If Colombo can reach the standards of Singapore, then it'll certainly be higher up than jakarta or mumbai.

    You are still comparing present day Colombo, a city battered with 20+ years of war with other cities.
     

    sri_lion

    Member
    Sep 14, 2006
    12,908
    102
    0
    Kuala Lumpur
    kosandpol said:
    Saying that just because mumbai and jakarta is up there at 140, Colombo should be higher up, is arguing blindly.
    Right now cost of living in Colombo is higher than that of Jakarta (Dunno about Mumbai) and facilities wise Jakarta again fairs better. Hygiene and pollution wise I pretty sure Colombo fair better. Night life and entertainment wise Jakarta is miles ahead.
    If Colombo can reach the standards of Singapore, then it'll certainly be higher up than jakarta or mumbai.

    Again there's no sense here... So how do you think these researchers weighted the points? Could hygiene and pollution be weighted same as Nightlife? or one them considered more important and given higher points with in comparison to each other?

    Because hygiene and pollution effects everybody unlike Nightlife!
     

    fanci

    Member
    Nov 2, 2007
    567
    0
    0
    In the Middle of Nowhere
    kosandpol said:
    Saying that just because mumbai and jakarta is up there at 140, Colombo should be higher up, is arguing blindly.
    Right now cost of living in Colombo is higher than that of Jakarta (Dunno about Mumbai) and facilities wise Jakarta again fairs better. Hygiene and pollution wise I pretty sure Colombo fair better. Night life and entertainment wise Jakarta is miles ahead.
    If Colombo can reach the standards of Singapore, then it'll certainly be higher up than jakarta or mumbai.
    If the Cost of living was a factor , Cities like Zurich, Vienna, Geneva has no place in here.:D
     
    Last edited:

    kosandpol

    Well-known member
  • Jun 10, 2008
    45,329
    1,492
    113
    sri_lion said:
    Again there's no sense here... So how do you think these researchers weighted the points? Could hygiene and pollution be weighted same as Nightlife? or one them considered more important and given higher points with in comparison to each other?

    Because hygiene and pollution effects everybody unlike Nightlife!
    Both are equally imporatant. That rating has been given from the point of view of how those cities fare for expacts.
    If the Cost of living was a factor , Cities like Zurich, Vienna, Geneva has no place in here
    True. CoL doesnt matter for this rating.