Christian Buddhism

Pathumlk

Member
Oct 2, 2006
738
3
0
42
Ganemulla
Y2K said:
Kauruwath uba vinasha wenakal balan inne na ube vinasha hituwa ubai ube thrushnawai ........................... poor child anyway ................. will stop this ok :D

meka ube Tread ekenane.. ai nawattawanna hitanne... Ideas nadda..? natnam hoyanawada..? help ekak dennada.. ? :P:P:P
 

Y2K

Member
Jun 11, 2007
11,007
165
0
In your heart
Pathumlk said:
meka ube Tread ekenane.. ai nawattawanna hitanne... Ideas nadda..? natnam hoyanawada..? help ekak dennada.. ? :P:P:P


NA NO NEED ........................ UBATA ONE MAMA LOSE KIYANNA NE ...OK YOU WIN THANK YOU
 

CjRox

Member
Jan 11, 2008
617
0
0
Yaarnick said:
Mokada answers nadda ewata????? :lol: :lol: :lol:

mechchara lokayata vinashayak weddi ai ban ubalage deiyo balagena inne???

Thawath ubala deiyo vishwasa kayanawane.....
Ane manda....

Follow the path you believe it's Ok!....

Cheers...........


you seems to be a bit uneducated...
ehenan ochchara ratata seth pathala pinkam kalath ei ratata sethak wenne naththe...ane sahodaraya... tikaka kalpana karanna...
 

Y2K

Member
Jun 11, 2007
11,007
165
0
In your heart
http://www.target.com/gp/detail.html/601-2639346-5124136?asin=1425932819&afid=yahoosspplp_bmvd&lnm=1425932819|The_First_Scientific_Proof_of_God:_:_Reveals_God's_Intelligent_Design_and_a_Modern_Creation_Theory_:_Books&ref=tgt_adv_XSNG1060
 

Y2K

Member
Jun 11, 2007
11,007
165
0
In your heart
Physicists have discovered the mechanism that prevents us from seeing the Kingdom of God by electromagnetic waves.



When I was a graduate student majoring in physics, I was an atheist. To me, God was a product of ignorance, due to lack of scientific knowledge. If people understood natural laws as well as physicists, they would not believe the existence of God. At that time, I did not know that most great physicists were God's believers, such as Newton, Kepler, Planck, Heisenberg and Einstein.

Ten years after I received a Ph.D. in physics, I became a Christian - not because I found any hard scientific evidence about God. Like most believers, I felt that there must be a God who had been guiding me, otherwise some events that had happened to me would not be so coincidental.

The existence of God was so real that I had been wondering: where could God be? why couldn't we see Him? how come modern technology could not detect God? Since I was trained in physics, I believed that all natural phenomena should have a physical explanation. If God really exists, these questions can be answered in terms of physical law. However, I did not know where or how to find the scientific answer. It might be impossible to know the answer at all.

In 2000, almost ten years after I became a Christian, I happened to read an article about string theory. My specialty was in biophysics, not in theoretical physics, but I had great interest in our universe - especially new concepts. The string theory just offered a completely new concept about our universe. After I read that article, I was thrilled. This must be it! God must be there! He could be only a centimeter away from us without being detected. Physicists have discovered the mechanism that prevents us from seeing the Kingdom of God!

The string theory has been developed for several decades, with a goal to become "the theory of everything", that is, to unify all four fundamental forces - gravity, electromagnetism, strong and weak nuclear forces. A revolutionary discovery of the theory is that the whole universe should have nine or ten dimensions of space, instead of three dimensions (length, width and height). Then, why do we see only three dimensions? In the earlier version of the string theory, it was assumed that those extra dimensions were too small to be observed. Thus, the whole universe is essentially the same as the 3D world. If this were true, there would be no place for God. Fortunately, a few years before 2000, researchers began to realize that those extra dimensions could be as large as the ordinary three dimensions. The reason why we cannot see extra dimensions is because all matter and electromagnetic waves (photons) are confined in a three dimensional sub-universe called "braneworld".

At present, the major agent we use to see or detect things is the electromagnetic waves which include radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, and x-ray. Since the electromagnetic waves are confined in our braneworld, this immediately explains why we cannot detect God if He lives outside our braneworld. The relationship between our braneworld (three dimensional) and the whole universe (ten dimensional) is like a flat (two dimensional) TV screen in our house (three dimensional). Suppose there is a creature confined on the TV screen, he cannot see us even if we are only a centimeter away from him. Similarly, if God lives in the ten dimensional space but outside our braneworld, we cannot see Him even if He is only a centimeter away from us.

What is the mechanism that confines matter and photons in our braneworld?

We know that all matter in our world is composed of atoms. An atom consists of a nucleus and electrons. A nucleus contains protons and neutrons, which are made up of quarks. The electron and quarks are elementary particles which cannot be divided further. In addition to the elementary particles that constitute matter, there are another type of elementary particles that mediate the fundamental force between matter particles. For example, the electromagnetic force is mediated by photon, the gravity is mediated by graviton. You may have learned that the magnetic force is mediated by the magnetic field. Similarly, you can say that the electromagnetic force is mediated by the electromagnetic field. In quantum physics, a "field" can also be viewed ("quantized") as a particle. The photon is the particle name of the electromagnetic field. The graviton is the particle name of the gravitational field. A field may also be static (like a magnetic field) or dynamic (such as the electromagnetic waves).

According to the string theory, an elementary particle can be considered as a "string" with extremely short length. All properties (mass, energy, etc.) of an elementary particle are inherent in the string's vibrational patterns. The particle string is analogous to a violin string whose vibrations produce various music notes. Similarly, different vibrational patterns of a particle string give rise to different properties. The vibrational patterns depend on the endpoints of a string. The particle string can be either "open" (with two endpoints, like a violin string) or "closed" (no endpoints, like a ring). In contrast to a violin string whose endpoints are fixed on a wooden board, the endpoints of a particle string are fixed in a "brane" (as in membrane), which is an object with one, two, three or more dimensions of space located within the whole (bulk) universe. Since its endpoints are fixed, the open-string particle cannot escape from the brane. However, the closed-string particle can go anywhere in the bulk universe because it has no endpoints to be fixed. Mathematically, different endpoints have different boundary conditions that are used in solving the equations for the vibrational patterns.

The properties of elementary particles in our world are known from experiments. The vibrational patterns of a particle string can be obtained by solving the fundamental equation in the string theory with appropriate boundary conditions (corresponding to endpoints). It has been found that, in order to match particle properties with vibrational patterns, the graviton must be a closed string, while the photon must be an open string with endpoints fixed in a brane. Therefore, the graviton that mediates the gravitational force may go anywhere in the bulk universe, but the photon (electromagnetic wave) that we use to see and detect things is trapped in our braneworld. The electron and quarks (which form protons and neutrons) are also open strings and should be confined in our braneworld.



Last updated: April, 2007.
 

Y2K

Member
Jun 11, 2007
11,007
165
0
In your heart
The Kingdom of God could evolve from the vacuum.



If God created us, who created God? This is the question often raised by atheists. Most theists will answer this question by saying that God has no cause (discussion). Similarly, if you ask a physicist: what is the origin of the physical laws? He may answer that the physical laws have no cause.

We know our universe has something, but something cannot arise from nothing. We must assume certain things that are self existent (the aseity). In theology, God is the aseity while in science physical laws are the aseity. Since we are trying to understand the Kingdom of God from a scientific point of view, we shall accept physical laws as the aseity.

The "Physical God"

Most people will agree that "God" may be defined as the creator of the three-dimensional world that we live in. According to the string theory, our three dimensional world is a braneworld embedded in a higher dimensional universe (possibly 10 dimensions). As shown in previous articles, our braneworld could be created by the highly intelligent life living in the bulk space (the space outside of any branes). The highly intelligent life in the bulk space is the "God" we are referring to.

By this definition, God should also be made up of matter. The elementary particles that constitute His matter are entirely different from us (see What is the Kingdom of God Made of?). However, they should still be governed by the physical laws that apply to all kinds of particles. These general physical laws include the conservation of energy, the second law of thermodynamics, the Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, and the Einstein's equation that relates energy to the mass of a particle: E = mc2.

We do not know the initial condition of the bulk universe. The most natural assumption is that it started with an empty space. That is, before any matter was created, the bulk universe contained only vacuum. As shown below, physical laws allow highly intelligent life (God) to evolve from the vacuum.

How could matter be created from vacuum?

According to Einstein's equation, the particles that constitute matter contain energy. On the other hand, the energy conservation law states that the total energy of a closed system must be a constant. It is impossible to create or reduce the total energy. Then, how could matter be created from vacuum? Would it violate the energy conservation law?

The key point that matter can be created from vacuum is that the gravitational potential energy is negative, which may cancel the positive mass energy of the matter. This possibility even surprised Albert Einstein, as told by George Gamow in his book My World Line. In the 1940s, a colleague of George Gamow had an idea that a star could be created out of nothing if its negative gravitational energy precisely cancels out its positive mass energy. One day, Gamow mentioned this idea to Einstein while they were walking in Princeton. Einstein immediately stopped in his tracks and fell into deep thought. Since they were crossing a street, several cars had to stop to avoid running them down.

In reality, a star is unlikely to be created out of nothing because its gravitational energy is too small to cancel out its huge mass energy. However, there is a mechanism that can facilitate the creation of small particles from vacuum: quantum fluctuation.

Quantum fluctuation

According to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, we cannot determine energy and time precisely. Therefore, it is possible for a group of particles with non-zero total energy to appear naturally and then disappear within a short time. The more the total energy is created, the shorter the lifetime. This process is known as the quantum fluctuation. Because of quantum fluctuation, the vacuum cannot be absolutely nothing. It should still have some energy (the vacuum energy).

In the past several decades, quantum fluctuation has been widely used by cosmologists to explain the origin of the Big Bang that started our braneworld. However, the Big Bang involves the creation of a huge amount of energy that seems unlikely to arise from a natural quantum fluctuation. A more likely scenario is that the Big Bang was created by God in the bulk universe and the Kingdom of God was created by quantum fluctuation.

Although the lifetime of the particles created by quantum fluctuation is short, they may decay into other types of particles or interact with each other to form stable particles during their lifetime. As time proceeded, some structures equivalent to our atoms could be formed. Eventually, a habitable environment and life could be developed. Since the bulk universe is eternal, there was plenty of time for an intelligent life to evolve from tiny particles.

Restriction in our braneworld
Nearly all elementary particles that constitute ordinary matter (as given in the Standard Model) contain electric charges. These particles are restricted by the charge conservation law. Thus, the creation of a particle usually requires the creation of its antiparticle (with identical mass, but opposite charge). However, a particle can annihilate its antiparticle, producing photons. This constraint prevents the creation of ordinary matter from vacuum.

The elementary particles in the Kingdom of God are entirely different from ordinary particles. Most of them may not have electric charges.

The second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of a closed system can never decrease. The entropy is a measure of disorder. More order means less entropy. Then, where did the order come from? Does the evolution process violate the second law of thermodynamics? This topic is discussed in the next article.
 

Y2K

Member
Jun 11, 2007
11,007
165
0
In your heart
The Kingdom of God may consist of
gravitons, Higgs particles, superpartners and others.

Most people think that supernatural beings (gods, spirits, etc) are not made of matter because we cannot see them or touch them. However, as explained in a previous article, we are confined in a braneworld (a sub-universe) which is embedded in a higher dimensional bulk universe. We cannot see anything outside our braneworld. Our hands cannot reach beyond the braneworld. In fact, all matter and electromagnetic waves are trapped in the braneworld. Suppose gods and spirits are made up of matter, but living outside our braneworld, we still cannot see or touch them, even if they are located only a millimeter away from us.

If the "Kingdom of God" or "spirit world" is made up of matter, what are the elementary particles that constitute their matter? This question is important in proving the existence of God. If our braneworld was created by God, all particles in our braneworld must originate from the Kingdom of God. To show that our particles came from the Kingdom of God, we must know the properties of their particles.

It must have the graviton.

In the string theory, the graviton (gravitational field) is known to be a closed string, capable of moving anywhere in the bulk universe. The graviton must exist in the bulk space where the Kingdom of God resides.

It should have the Higgs boson ("God particle")

The properties of all elementary particles that constitute ordinary matter can be explained by a well established model known as the Standard Model. These ordinary particles have been observed experimentally, except the Higgs particle. All elementary particles (ordinary or not) can be divided into two types: bosons and fermions. The Higgs particle is a boson and thus often called the Higgs boson.

The existence of the Higgs boson was proposed by Peter Higgs in 1964 to explain the origin of the mass for all elementary particles. The Higgs field associated with the Higgs particle is assumed to permeate the entire universe. The mass of an elementary particle arises from its interaction with the Higgs field. Without the Higgs particle, all elementary particles would be massless.

Because the Higgs particle is so fundamental and "omnipresent", it is dubbed as the "God particle" by physicists. Although the Higgs particle has not been observed experimentally, most physicists believe it should exist. The recently constructed Large Hadron Collider (LHC) may be able to detect it. Whether the Higgs particle exists or not will be known in the near future. If it exists in our braneworld, it should also exist in the bulk space.

It may contain "superpartners" of ordinary particles.

A superpartner is a super-symmetrical particle of an ordinary particle, analogous to the antiparticle which is a charge-symmetrical particle of an ordinary particle. In the early 20th century, physicists proposed a charge conjugate symmetry to solve some theoretical problems. They postulated that for every negatively charged particle (such as an electron), there should be a positively charged particle with the same other properties; and vice versa. The charge-symmetrical particles are known as antiparticles. They have later been observed experimentally.
Again, in 1970s, physicists found that the supersymmetry could solve several theoretical problems. The supersymmetry is also essential in the string theory. This symmetry is between bosons and fermions - the two types of elementary particles. In our braneworld, fermions (such as the electron and the quarks that form protons and neutrons) constitute matter while bosons (such as the graviton and photon) carry forces.

In quantum physics, every elementary particle has a property called spin, which can be either an integer (0, 1, or 2) or half integer (1/2, 3/2, etc). By definition, bosons are the particles with integer spin and fermions are the particles with half-integer spin. The assumption of supersymmetry states that for every fermion there should be at least one boson partner; and vice versa. Thus, the spin of a particle differs from the spin of its superpartner by 1/2 or multiple of 1/2.

The properties of superpartners can be obtained theoretically in the four dimensional spacetime (corresponding to our braneworld) or in the higher dimensional spacetime. None of the predicted superpartners has been observed yet. However, they could be abundant in our braneworld. It has been estimated that the invisible dark matter makes up about 25% of all matter in our braneworld. Substantial evidence indicates that the dark matter may consist of superpartners. It is very likely that these superpartners are related to the higher dimensional superpartners that God used to create our braneworld (more info).

It may have other bulk particles (fields)

The "bulk" particle refers to the particle capable of moving anywhere in the bulk universe, as opposed to "brane" particles which are confined in a brane. In the string theory, a bulk particle is characterized by a closed string and a brane particle is characterized by an open string with two endpoints fixed on the brane. The graviton is an example of the bulk particle and the photon is an example of the brane particle.

In quantum physics, a particle is considered the quantization of an associated field. The particle and its associated field are two different views for the same thing. The graviton is the same as the gravitational field and the photon is the same as the electromagnetic field. A scalar field is the field that has no direction and a vector field has a direction.

The bulk space may contain some particles that are not the superpartners of ordinary particles. The bulk particle is a general term for any elementary particle in the bulk space. Very interestingly, more and more cosmologists and particle physicists are investigating the properties of the bulk particles. Some of them even propose that all particles in our braneworld were created by interaction between certain bulk particles and our brane. Are they creationists? This kind of models are consistent with a creationism in which these bulk particles were carefully selected by God so that, after interacting with our brane, they may produce ordinary particles with all finely tuned properties for the formation of atoms, molecules and life
 

Yaarnick

Well-known member
  • Mar 13, 2007
    1,337
    44
    48
    43
    London
    CjRox said:
    you seems to be a bit uneducated...
    ehenan ochchara ratata seth pathala pinkam kalath ei ratata sethak wenne naththe...ane sahodaraya... tikaka kalpana karanna...


    From this statement shows that you don't know about Buddhism. Buddhism is not saying pirth and doing pinkam. :cool: :cool: :cool:

    Myself also don't know very deep inside of Buddhism. But I can simply say something about Buddhism. It's a way that any one can find a path to freedom or else path to get rid from every pain in this world. According to Buddhism everything inside you. Look deep inside to yourself, you can find everything.

    If you can't find things and what is in deep, just follow what and how Buddha had describe it. Else you don't need to refer what Buddha said or any other ones said. If your mind can figure out the things by yourself, your the great.

    And also I can measure your education level from this and I have a clear about that.. :P :P
     

    Yaarnick

    Well-known member
  • Mar 13, 2007
    1,337
    44
    48
    43
    London
    Y2K said:
    Kauruwath uba vinasha wenakal balan inne na ube vinasha hituwa ubai ube thrushnawai ........................... poor child anyway ................. will stop this ok :D

    That's right machan.... :yes:

    Everything is in ourselves machan... :yes:

    This is Buddhism "ube vinasha hituwa ubai ube thrushnawai" :D

    Not the God... :no:

    You came to the point... :cool:
     

    Y2K

    Member
    Jun 11, 2007
    11,007
    165
    0
    In your heart
    My friend Just think about your parent ..... do they like to see the fall of their children? so like that our father in heaven will never ever want's anyone to fall ok brother he is a perfect father ....................... but you have the freedom of choice ... if you made wrong choice then you ruin you life yourself .............. "ube vinasha hituwa ubai ube thrushnawai" remove that word Ube " we use "ape" mokada meka podu dharmathawayak ...... I hope you can defeat all your cravenness in this life
     

    Y2K

    Member
    Jun 11, 2007
    11,007
    165
    0
    In your heart
    Yaarnick said:
    From this statement shows that you don't know about Buddhism. Buddhism is not saying pirth and doing pinkam. :cool: :cool: :cool:

    Myself also don't know very deep inside of Buddhism. But I can simply say something about Buddhism. It's a way that any one can find a path to freedom or else path to get rid from every pain in this world. According to Buddhism everything inside you. Look deep inside to yourself, you can find everything.

    If you can't find things and what is in deep, just follow what and how Buddha had describe it. Else you don't need to refer what Buddha said or any other ones said. If your mind can figure out the things by yourself, your the great.

    And also I can measure your education level from this and I have a clear about that.. :P :P


    DO not judge people
     

    Y2K

    Member
    Jun 11, 2007
    11,007
    165
    0
    In your heart
    anarkalee said:
    ane manda
    amma bhudhist
    dad christian
    so mata agam wala wenasak ne


    2kama hodai .......... samahara wita ekka itath wada hoda wenna puluwan ube wishwsayan matha .......................

    GBU & BS
     

    nuwanoo7

    Well-known member
  • Jul 18, 2007
    4,057
    56
    48
    kurunegala
    Y2K said:
    DO not judge people


    onna ayath patan gathha.............. ubata nam sammanayak denna one............ mokkada dannawada sammane............ "mithyawak pitupasa wadima durak duwapu ekama minisa sammanaya":yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P
     

    nuwanoo7

    Well-known member
  • Jul 18, 2007
    4,057
    56
    48
    kurunegala
    Y2K said:
    2kama hodai .......... samahara wita ekka itath wada hoda wenna puluwan ube wishwsayan matha .......................

    GBU & BS

    Weldon brother..................... eka thadayamak nam hari wage neda........ you are a good hunter :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes:
     

    Y2K

    Member
    Jun 11, 2007
    11,007
    165
    0
    In your heart
    nuwanoo7 said:
    onna ayath patan gathha.............. ubata nam sammanayak denna one............ mokkada dannawada sammane............ "mithyawak pitupasa wadima durak duwapu ekama minisa sammanaya":yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P


    me uba ube wadak balagena hitapan ok ....kata waraddaganna epa :D