final nail on the islamic creation??

[Zahina Rishad]

This video is soooooooo.... interesting ..

 

[gpnuwan]

koooooooooo

 

[Mononoke]

If you really want a book on evolution read this :

Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life by Daniel Dennet.

He's a really cool guy. The book is also much better than Dawkin's one.

 

[hafizsaad]

final nail on the islamic creation??
This video is soooooooo.... interesting ..[/B][/SIZE]

The dawkin in the vedio you have given, is saying my book is on evolution and evolution through natural selection.

Click on the link below and then read and see the reality where the final nail is "on the islamic creation" or "on the athieism".

THE CLAIM THAT "NATURAL SELECTION CAUSES EVOLUTION" IS A FRAUDULENT ONE

THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION: A UNIQUE DECEPTION IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD

THE FOSSIL RECORD REFUTES EVOLUTION

WHAT DARWINISTS SAID, WHAT HAPPENED THEN

RICHARD DAWKINS' AND DAILY HURRIYET'S IGNORANCE


GREAT BOOKS THAT DEMOLISH THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION



.

 

[Mononoke]

The dawkin in the vedio you have given, is saying my book is on evolution and evolution through natural selection.

Click on the link below and then read and see the reality where the final nail is "on the islamic creation" or "on the athieism".

THE CLAIM THAT "NATURAL SELECTION CAUSES EVOLUTION" IS A FRAUDULENT ONE

THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION: A UNIQUE DECEPTION IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD

THE FOSSIL RECORD REFUTES EVOLUTION

WHAT DARWINISTS SAID, WHAT HAPPENED THEN

RICHARD DAWKINS' AND DAILY HURRIYET'S IGNORANCE


GREAT BOOKS THAT DEMOLISH THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION



.

hafizsaad, you the most blind, obstinate, misguided person i have ever met.

My guess is that you have never ever questioned for a second what you believe. I am also willing to guess that you yourself personally never read any of the links you post. They are full of bogus and puerile arguments that have been successfully dealt with.

Why do you have to go out of the way to deny objective reality. Darwin is true, it is incorrigible at this point. the evidence is overwhelming and keeps piling up.

I truly pity you. Good Bye and Good Night!

 

[hafizsaad]

read in rational way and then comments on what are bogus and puerile arguments you have found in that articles.

i have also same thinking about that you are the most blind, obstinate, misguided person i have ever met.

i have claim antheism has no proof for its theories and have only bogus and unrealistic detail and all darwins and dawkin books are only the tail stories and assumption. read what the Quran say about creation of mankind. Quran say we have make Human Being superior on other creation and give dignity on all other creation and you non sense people try to prove human being child of monkeys. non of a single man who has mind can accept it and even darwan says himself admitted that the lack of any intermediate form fossils would constitute the greatest objection to his theory:

… why, if species have descended from other species by fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion, instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined? … But, as by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the Earth?... Why, then, is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against my theory. (Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, New York: The Modern Library, pp. 124-25, 179,)

That is what Darwin said and that is what happened. Not a single intermediate fossil has been found for 150 years. All the fossils discovered belong to independent life forms. Darwin’s theory had totally collapsed in the face of this manifest reality.
THEY ARE VERY WELL AWARE that the chances of a single protein of all those that make up the cell forming coincidentally are 1 in 10950, in other words, that it is IMPOSSIBLE,
- And that therefore, not a single component of as glorious and irreducibly complex a structure as the cell COULD NEVER COME INTO BEING BY CHANCE.

People now know that all Darwinist accounts of the origin and development of life are deceptions.Darwinism has rotted away; this false ideology has been left with no ground to stand on with the exposure of Darwinist frauds and demagoguery; people have now seen the proofs of Creation; have seen 100 million fossils that have remained completely unchanged; have witnessed proof that Darwinist myths are total nonsense.

 

[Mononoke]

That is what Darwin said and that is what happened. Not a single intermediate fossil has been found for 150 years. All the fossils discovered belong to independent life forms. Darwin’s theory had totally collapsed in the face of this manifest reality.

Look! Is it a bird, is a dino? No, it's a Dino-bird. And a swift kick to a certain someones face as well

 

[Mononoke]

THEY ARE VERY WELL AWARE that the chances of a single protein of all those that make up the cell forming coincidentally are 1 in 10950, in other words, that it is IMPOSSIBLE,
- And that therefore, not a single component of as glorious and irreducibly complex a structure as the cell COULD NEVER COME INTO BEING BY CHANCE.

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=746

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_eye

http://www.talkdesign.org/faqs/flagellum_background.html

http://www.talkdesign.org/faqs/Evolving_Immunity.html

Now go roll in your own grave.

P.S: None of the people who wrote those articles are in jail at the moment.

 

[3.5G]

Biology isn't my subject I mean I don't know fossils and gossils and jurraasic stuff !!! but this articles I can understand a bit WHAT DARWINISTS SAID, WHAT HAPPENED THEN

Nebraska Man:
What They Said:
“Nebraska's Ape man of the western world,” (The New York Times, Sept. 17, sect. 7, p. 1, 1924)

What Happened:
Nebraska ape tooth proved a wild pig's. (The New York Times, Feb. 20, p. 1)
"Hesperopithecus (The Nebraska Man) dethroned" (The Times (London), Feb. 21, p. 16)

 

[Mononoke]

Biology isn't my subject I mean I don't know fossils and gossils and jurraasic stuff !!! but this articles I can understand a bit WHAT DARWINISTS SAID, WHAT HAPPENED THEN

Of course, Science makes mistakes and there are many instances of science done bad. But the scientific theory always corrects itself. If you look closely most of the people who corrected the mistakes in those science were scientists and evolutionists themselves.

That is another reason some people prefer the scientific explanation. There is nothing to hide. If you do something wrong, the chances are you will be caught and corrected within months.

 

[hafizsaad]

Look! Is it a bird, is a dino? No, it's a Dino-bird. And a swift kick to a certain someones face as well

no intelligent person can accept this fake pictures, the people who has read my posted article they now the reality of your comments.

Of course, Science makes mistakes and there are many instances of science done bad. But the scientific theory always corrects itself.

openly say we have no answer to your question dont give a lame excuse for it, Admit darwin theory has no answer for it and it is a false tale.

 

[Mononoke]

no intelligent person can accept this fake pictures, the people who has read my posted article they now the reality of your comments.





openly say we have no answer to your question dont give a lame excuse for it, Admit darwin theory has no answer for it and it is a false tale.

Of course the BBC is full of mumbling, bumbling, fumbling buffoons for accepting those pictures. Say, have you ever been to a museum, or are museums of natural history Haram as well.

Of course there are some question that haven't been answered by science. I am open and frank about that. That doesn't undermine science in anyway, Scientist are searching for those answers and refining all the answered we have already.

 

[Mononoke]

I followed up on all the claims Harun Yahya makes on this page. It wasn't surprising to find that the article was at the very least misleading and definitely pointless. What was the point of it, scientist disagree about how evolution exactly happened, or that scientists makes blunder which other scientists correct? None of these say anything about the validity of evolution. Scientists referred to in this article all believe in the Darwinian Synthesis. What ever problems they have, are with the exact details of how 5 billion years of evolution happened and not with the Darwinian process as a whole.

What this website fails to announce is the mountain of corroborating evidence for Natural Selection


Some of those statements are true the Archeaoraptor is clearly a fake, so was the Nebraska man. While others were distortions of truth at best, and outright lies at worst. And some statements were empty platitudes that makes no sense what so ever. Firstly, the format of the article is misleading. Statements are presented under the theme 'they said' and responses as 'what happened'. Giving the impression that 'they', the scientific community as a whole ,made a statement which was debunked by some evidence later on. however, if one scrutinizes these statements the 'they' are for the most part individuals while 'what happened' is only an opinion of an individual. Most of these examples are not evidence of any kind, but examples of scientific disputes. As i said earlier people argue, that is how we arrive at resolutions. It is fraudulent to take one side of an unresolved and ambiguous argument and claim that as unequivocal fact. Furthermore, 'they' refers to the plural while persons like Liang Bua are singular. This leads to the tantalizing conclusion that, Adnan Oktar, the owner of Harun Yahya, on top of being a convicted felon, does not understand basic grammar.

1)

Junk DNA
What They Said:
Prof. Beyazıt Çırakoğlu: "It is thought that these DNA sequences are no-longer-used junk DNA sequences.”

What Happened:
Evan Eichler, an evolutionist scientist from Washington University " The term ‘junk DNA’ is a reflection of our ignorance."

WTF, so two scientists disagree. that is what people do, big deal. This doesn't show any thing. If you are interested in finding out what 'Junk DNA' just follow the link.

2)

Neanderthals:
What They Said:
Darwinists claimed that Neanderthals were a more primitive human race.

What Happened:
Erik Trinkaus: “Detailed comparisons of Neanderthal skeletal remains with those of modern humans have shown that there is nothing in Neanderthal anatomy that conclusively indicates locomotor, manipulative, intellectual, or linguistic abilities inferior to those of modern humans.” (Erik Trinkaus, "Hard Times Among the Neanderthals," Natural History, vol. 87, December 1978, p. 10; R. L. Holloway, "The Neanderthal Brain: What Was Primitive," American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement, vol. 12, 1991, p. 94. )

“What was considered a major piece of evidence showing that the Neanderthals once lived in northern Europe has fallen by the wayside. We are having to rewrite prehistory.” (Tony Paterson, “Neanderthal Man ‘never walked in northern Europe”, 22 August 2004)

This is another piece of misinformation here is the original article. What was going on was Professor Reiner Protsch von Zietenhad made a dubious claim about one particular Neanderthal fossil and Oxford University had called him out. what this doesn't prove is that Neanderthals didn't exist, there are hundreds of fossils of them, or that they never coexisted with humans, Erik Trinkaus himself has found 28,000 year old Neanderthal. He also consequently argues that Neanderthals and humans interbred as well. No wonder some of us are ugly. In summation, another meaningless blurb.

3)

Homo Floresiensis (Flores Man – Hobbit):
What They Said:
BBC: Australian archaeologists unearthed the bones while digging at a site called Liang Bua, one of numerous limestone caves on Flores. The remains of the partial skeleton were found at a depth of 5.9m (19ft).
The bones unearthed by Australian scientists in the Liang Bua province excavations opens a new era in the history of archaeology. The examinations made on tooth, coccyx and skull revealed that the living being was no different than human beings and walked upright. This new living being (Homo floresiensis) was named after the island (Flores island) where the skeleton was found.

What Happened:
It came out that these remains belonged to deformed individuals of Homo sapiens.

The conclusion drawn here is a lie. The scientific community is bitterly divided on this fossil. Laing et al, maintain that this is a pigmy human being. Pigmyfication or microcephaly is when a species is forced to shrink in size due to evolutionary forces, this is well documented in elephants and mammoth. Another group maintains that the fossil is a deformed human. the third group says that this is an entirely different spiece.

4)This link deals with the Horse issue much better than I can.

5)

Lucy:
What They Said:
Darwinist Berhane Asfaw from California University said: “We just found the chain of evolution, the continuity through time.”
“One form evolved to another. This is evidence of evolution in one place through time.”

What Happened:
On May 1999 Science et Vie put Lucy on its cover. The following quotation is from the article, "Adieu Lucy": “…that apes of the species Australopithecus did not represent the origin of man.”

Albert W. Mehlert (evolutionist and paleoanthropology researcher: “The evidence given above makes it overwhelmingly likely that Lucy was no more than a variety of pygmy chimpanzee, and walked the same way (awkwardly upright on occasions, but mostly quadrupedal). The “evidence” for the alleged transformation from ape to man is extremely unconvincing.”

Once again we see dusinformation. The humerofemoral ratio, or length of humerus divided by length of femur, is 84.6 for Lucy, compared to 71.8 for humans, and 97.8 and 101.6 for the two species of chimpanzee. In other words, humans have much shorter arms compared to their legs than chimpanzees do, and Lucy falls roughly in the middle.

I can go on, but whats the point. I'm going to leave things as it is with a wonderful picture of Adnan Oktar, author of Harun Yahya.