Latest ads
-
Pure VPN - Up to 27 Months- vgp
- Updated:
-
Gemini AI PRO 18 months Offer- Hawaka
- Updated:
-
koko account
- DasunEranga
- Updated:
History Repeats...
- Thread starter honesty
- Start date
yup, he was south indian born Theravada Buddhist, he came here and ruled as per Sinhalese tradition neh,,
still can't understand why you mentioned it here,,
btw after all he was the sinhale king,,
උබ දන්න මගුල තමා... උබෙ ඔය ලොගිස්ටික්ස් කොම්පැනි එක කරෙ මොකක්ද? එදා අපු උන්ගෙ කක්ක ඇද්දද? උබ අඩු ගානෙ නුවර ඇවිල්ලවත් තියන්ව නම් ඔක කියන්නෙ නෑ..
යකො, දලදා මලිගාව ඉස්සරහ රේස් පැද්දෙ නෑ.. මම ඕක බලන්නත් ගියා.. දලදා මාලිගව ඉස්සරහට අවෙ අර උම්බලගෙ මහා වීර ප්රභකරන් ගේ බොම්බ ලොරිය විතරයි බං.
අනික බලපං අර මල්වත්ත හාමුදුරුවෝ පට්ට යුන්පී කාරයා. අර භික්ෂු පනතත් හොදයිලු. උබ හිතනන්නේ මාලිගාව ඉස්සරහ රේස් පදින එකයි, රට බෙදලා දාන එකයි එකයි කියලද?
උබේ මොල් නැතිකම නිසා වන්දිගෙව්න්න වෙන්නේ අහිංසක සාමන්ය මිනිස්සුන්ට. ගිහිල්ලා චින්තන ධර්මදාසගෙන් බන අහපං තමාත් අහුවේ නැත්නම්.
yup, he was south indian born Theravada Buddhist, he came here and ruled as per Sinhalese tradition neh,,
still can't understand why you mentioned it here,,
btw after all he was the sinhale king,,
Vira Parakrama Narendra Sinha was the last Sinhale King Mate. It was a mistake to marry women from Madurai where how kingship is passed is different there.
Finally Sinhalese had to import Kings from South India like UNP government is going import IT guys
The mother tongue last King of Sinhale lineage was Tamil and Tamil was used in courts way before 13th amendment at that time.Reason i brought is, as normal citizens we cannot select a King, if he is bad we had to wait until he dies. When it comes to democracy one good thing is you can send president in 5 years. Same happened to MR, if My3 is bad we could send him home in 5 years and get another president, even it could be MR.
P.S : Do you like a presidential candidate who is from Tamilnadu who promises rule Sri Lanka according Sinhalese traditions and says he is a Theravada Buddhist (Technically there are no born buddhists, we should call them namata buddhist)?
What happened back then was pilimathallwe thought he could control the king but it ruined his life as well as his nephew's family and whole country. The Sinhalese nilames tried to reverse the historical confusion of offering throne to tamil kings by making an agreement with brits but it was indeed a fukin mistake.
And how that comes in line with present situation is also interesting. We used our so-called democracy which we hadn't back in 1815 and chose my3 is a better option than mahinda. So as our Nilames thought back then, but after some time they realize what they've done, so as we..
Personally I think 5 years of period is well enough to fuck the country upp,,Hell noh,, if I was a nilame back then i'd say no to both king and whites,, but a single tamil speaking namata Buddhist may be a better option than a Christian white king
What happened back then was pilimathallwe thought he could control the king but it ruined his life as well as his nephew's family and whole country. The Sinhalese nilames tried to reverse the historical confusion of offering throne to tamil kings by making an agreement with brits but it was indeed a fukin mistake.
And how that comes in line with present situation is also interesting. We used our so-called democracy which we hadn't back in 1815 and chose my3 is a better option than mahinda. So as our Nilames thought back then, but after some time they realize what they've done, so as we..
Hell noh,, if I was a nilame back then i'd say no to both king and whites,, but a single tamil speaking namata Buddhist may be a better option than a Christian white king
Nilames are just set of people not a sample of a whole country. Nilames did the change forcefully whereas MR called upon the election where as he initiated everything and he got lost. There was another chance after 8 months where as MR could not keep his 58 laks vote base to beat Ranil. It proves his vote base was heavily depended on his power. Again at back time you cannot criticize your king as you president, if you do you will be beheaded. If you do a mistake even your family children get beheaded and there will be alot of madduma bandara's
So i prefer democracy over monarchy every time. Its not about white king vs Tamil King, its all bout democracy vs monarch
මහනුවර මඟුල් මඩුවේ මේ සිද්ධිය අද වුනානම්,,
(ජාතික කොඩිය විකෘති කොට නොමැති අතර එදා පැවති ජාතික කොඩියම චිත්රය සඳහා භාවිතා කොට ඇති බව කරුණාවෙන් සලකන්න... )
පොලිසිය ඇවිල්ලා හාමුදුරුවන්ව අල්ලගෙන ගිහින්
මහ රජ්ජුරුවොන්ට කොරපු අපහාසෙට හිරේ දානවා,
ලෝකෙත් එක්ක අත්වැල් බැඳගන්න ස්වර්ණමය මොහොතේ සිංහල ජාතිවාදය අවුස්සනවා කියලා අපේම
පොන්න කලු සුද්දො fb පෝස්ට් දානවා,,
අනෙක් උන් පොන්නයො වගේ බලන් ඉන්නවා ,,
Nilames are just set of people not a sample of a whole country. Nilames did the change forcefully whereas MR called upon the election where as he initiated everything and he got lost. There was another chance after 8 months where as MR could not keep his 58 laks vote base to beat Ranil. It proves his vote base was heavily depended on his power. Again at back time you cannot criticize your king as you president, if you do you will be beheaded. If you do a mistake even your family children get beheaded and there will be alot of madduma bandara's
Its not about white king vs Tamil King, its all bout democracy vs monarch
I also prefer democracy bro, there's no doubt in that,,
What i was trying to say has nothing to do with supremacy of monarchy..
Rajasinghe gave deadlines to monarawila to surrender but he didn't respond and that lead to his family beheaded.. He should've secure his family first..
Btw i just saw some similarity between these two occasions, that's all...
