Hitachi announces terabyte Deskstar 7K1000

chaminga_d

Member
Oct 26, 2006
2,745
1
0
After years of urging us to get perpendicular, Hitachi is finally ready to announce its first 3.5" desktop hard drive to use perpendicular recording technology. This quarter, Hitachi will roll out a Deskstar 7K1000 boasting a terabyte of capacity using five 200GB platters spinning at 7,200RPM. The drive will be available with Serial and "parallel" ATA interfaces, and a four-platter 750GB model is also on the way. Serial ATA flavors of the 7K1000 will boast a whopping 32MB of onboard cache, while IDE models will be stuck with only 8MB.

While capacity is obviously the 7K1000's most attractive attribute, Hitachi is taking care to ensure that the drive is easy to live with, too. A three-stage idle mode has been developed to help lower the drive's power consumption, and that should also lower noise levels when the drive isn't seeking. Don't expect the 7K1000 to carry an obnoxious price premium, either. Hitachi expects the drive to sell for $399, which works out to only $0.40 per gigabyte—a lower cost per GB than Seagate's Barracuda 7200.10 750GB. A firm price hasn't been set for the 750GB Deskstar yet, but Hitachi says it will probably retail for $299.

Hitachi is targeting the Deskstar 7K1000 at high performance desktops and personal storage appliances, and is also working on a terabyte CinemaStar 7K1000 for set top box and DVR applications. The new CinemaStar is expected to ship in the second quarter of this year, although there are currently no plans to sell it in retail or as a bare drive. There is also an enterprise-class version of the 7K1000 in the works. That drive isn't being officially announced today, but it's expected to be released in the second quarter of this year. Hitachi says samples are already being tested by its OEM customers.
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
Finally!!! They are late :angry: They promised this drive before Christmas. All are the same :(
32MB cache would be nice! But I wished they had 10000RPM versions :( Western Digital really need a competitor. :yes:
 

chaminga_d

Member
Oct 26, 2006
2,745
1
0
32MB cache is great, but why aren't we seeing drives with even larger caches, such as 64MB, or more, even 512MB? I thought the performance boost offered by a larger cache was worthwhile. Too expensive? Diminishing returns?
 

zCexVe

Active member
  • Sep 12, 2006
    8,550
    22
    38
    Where I'm now
    even though they give us a very large cache about 512 MB it will be useless with other resources what we use with..32MB will be gr8 for many of us.Even 2 day 90%of ppl dont knw there is a cache memory in HDDs that has a gr8 share for the performance of the HDD..
     

    amila325

    Well-known member
  • Jul 11, 2006
    9,188
    33
    48
    hey i thought there are tera byte hard disks in the world for destop ne. hhhmmmmm...