how is this vga performing

Thilinacba

Well-known member
  • Sep 7, 2006
    13,526
    2,752
    113
    dexter.morgan.666 said:
    May be , but the problem im having is that most of them trying to buy " 256 mb VGA , 512 mb VGA " without knowing anything about their performance . :P:P:P
    ah,well thats just simple typical sri lankan's way[and not me].....most off ppl in SL thinks if its prize or quantity is higher than the other then its the best.we cant change it buddy
     
    Sep 18, 2007
    3,212
    6
    0
    Earth
    Thilinacba said:
    ah,well thats just simple typical sri lankan's way[and not me].....most off ppl in SL thinks if its prize or quantity is higher than the other then its the best.we cant change it buddy

    Yeah , we cant do anythig otherthan laughing our A**es off :P:P:P
     

    b squad

    Well-known member
  • Jun 20, 2008
    7,144
    424
    83
    36
    God Bless Sri lanka
    who cares about the brand if its durable and if its performing well thats wat matters.
    assasins creed work damn well in my vga. i played it with highest resolution, with all high details. worked well, u shld hav atleast dual core processor with 1gb ram to play it well..

    they have recomended core 2 duo but its working well in dualcore also.
     

    sri_lion

    Member
    Sep 14, 2006
    12,908
    102
    0
    Kuala Lumpur
    b squad said:
    who cares about the brand if its durable and if its performing well thats wat matters.
    assasins creed work damn well in my vga. i played it with highest resolution, with all high details. worked well, u shld hav atleast dual core processor with 1gb ram to play it well..

    they have recomended core 2 duo but its working well in dualcore also.

    For the least......

    If you can.... MAX OUT all the details, in 1280x1024 resolution, and get pass 25 fps.... then you can consider its good!
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    b squad said:
    galaxy geforce nvidea 8600gt 512mb
    there is 70 fps in it but i put 60fps n play
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:
    :rofl:

    Did I say ROFL? Not enough ROFLs...I know!

    Don't be lame. If you set max settings, you can't play at 25+ fps even on a stock 8800GT!

    When I set VERY HIGH in DX10 (Vista), I get a mere 15fps at 1280x1024 with my 9600GT. If you want 30fps, you need a 8800GTX at the minimum. End of story!
     
    Last edited:

    tharinda76

    Well-known member
  • Oct 25, 2007
    50,144
    1,888
    113
    Gannawanam eka parama asus 8800 GT ekak gannin. 8800 eka dala physicz card ekak demmanam kora thamai.. salli tamai prashne !! mage yaluwek langa tiyenawa graphics watura wage.. api seren sereta card marukararama padui !! anyway ASUS is da best !! issaranam chaa !! den ok !!
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    tharinda76 said:
    Gannawanam eka parama asus 8800 GT ekak gannin. 8800 eka dala physicz card ekak demmanam kora thamai.. salli tamai prashne !! mage yaluwek langa tiyenawa graphics watura wage.. api seren sereta card marukararama padui !! anyway ASUS is da best !! issaranam chaa !! den ok !!
    Actually buying a mid range card an upgrading every year is cheaper than going for the best.

    Say you bought a 9600GT instead of a 9800GTX now. 9600GT is less than half the price of a 9800GTX. In another year, the next generation midrange cards will be available for the same price as a current 9600GT, but will be faster than the 9800GTX. So by that time, you will have a faster card than a 9800GTX, but in the end you would have spent less (also taking into account the inflation, power bills, other costs such as having good cooling, bigger PSU etc. :D)