How muslims destroy temples.

[njsa]

dont say proof is in a book , u guys show a sentence in a book, and 2 make that sentence prove, u say it was sed by god, or its in holy book
What a wonderful way of proving something
Btw im gna write a book. Its title is>>> common ancestor of muslims is a pig
And i will prove it by quotig the sentences in my book, and saying its a holy work, god gave me dat knowledge bla bla

quran can proove to u by using science
in quran revealed 1400 years a go and there are many things which scientist discovered today.


There is no other book like it anywhere on earth. It is absolutely perfect in the Arabic language. It has no mistakes in grammar, meanings or context. The scientific evidences are well known around the entire world, even amongst non-Muslim scholars.
it is the only scripture remain uncorrupt on earth.
Predictions in the Quran have come true; and its teachings are clearly for all people, all places and all times. It was memorized by thousands of people during the lifetime of Muhammad, peace be upon him, and then this memorization was passed down from teacher to student for generation after generation, from mouth to ear and from one nation to another. Today every single Muslim has memorized some part of the Quran in the original Arabic language that it was revealed in over 1,400 years ago, even though most of them are not Arabs. There are over nine million (9,000,000) Muslims living on the earth today who have totally memorized the entire Quran, word for word, and can recite the entire Quran, in Arabic just as Muhammad, peace be upon him, did 14 centuries ago.

how many of u had memorised ur scripture.??

http://www.allahsquran.com/all_about_the_quran.php
if u want to know more about quran refer above link.and i think there were many scientific facts mentioned in this forum.

 

[smallvilleclerk50]

quran can proove to u by using science
in quran revealed 1400 years a go and there are many things which scientist discovered today.


There is no other book like it anywhere on earth. It is absolutely perfect in the Arabic language. It has no mistakes in grammar, meanings or context. The scientific evidences are well known around the entire world, even amongst non-Muslim scholars.
it is the only scripture remain uncorrupt on earth.
Predictions in the Quran have come true; and its teachings are clearly for all people, all places and all times. It was memorized by thousands of people during the lifetime of Muhammad, peace be upon him, and then this memorization was passed down from teacher to student for generation after generation, from mouth to ear and from one nation to another. Today every single Muslim has memorized some part of the Quran in the original Arabic language that it was revealed in over 1,400 years ago, even though most of them are not Arabs. There are over nine million (9,000,000) Muslims living on the earth today who have totally memorized the entire Quran, word for word, and can recite the entire Quran, in Arabic just as Muhammad, peace be upon him, did 14 centuries ago.

how many of u had memorised ur scripture.??

http://www.allahsquran.com/all_about_the_quran.php
if u want to know more about quran refer above link.and i think there were many scientific facts mentioned in this forum.

ok can u prove the world is made by god?? scientifically???
[ dont drag quran quotes 2 prove it]
and 4 the record, im not interested in ur quran lesn, hw many memorize it and all.

 

[I love Srilanka]

ok can u prove the world is made by god?? scientifically???
[ dont drag quran quotes 2 prove it]
and 4 the record, im not interested in ur quran lesn, hw many memorize it and all.

What if someone called a 'scientist' tells you his 'theory' of how cars are made is like this:

A salvage yard on the south side of town blows up and all the metal pieces fly into the air and fall back down in one place forming a brand new Chevrolet Caprice automobile.. with no left over parts.. and the motor is running..

Or what if his theory for how a chair is made is:

An explosion occurs in a forest and the trees go flying into the air and then suddenly they combine with some flying cloth to make a beautiful chair... and then it lands in a furniture showroom complete with matching table and lamp...

He further explains that:

An earthquake in California's 'Silicon Valley' causes the computer chips and circuit boards and other various parts to fall out of their boxes and off of their shelves and just come in place together as they are rolling around on the floor and form the most advanced technical computers existing on the earth?...
AND...

No one works at "Burger Blast", it just runs itself, automatically cleaning itself and as you leave it scans your billfold for a valid credit card and charges your bank account for what you have eaten?...

Now the question is: "Are you really going to accept any of this as 'fact'?"

Of course not!

We wouldn't believe a new car is made from flying junk; chairs don't fall down from exploding trees; earthquakes do not produce computers and blasting burgers don't rain down on us from above.
The science of modern cosmology, observational and theoretical, clearly indicates that, at one point in time, the whole universe was nothing but a cloud of 'smoke' (i.e. an opaque highly dense and hot gaseous composition). This is one of the undisputed principles of standard modern cosmology. Scientists now can observe new stars forming out of the remnants of that 'smoke'. The illuminating stars we see at night were, just as was the whole universe, in that 'smoke' material. God said in the Quran:

Then He turned to the heavens when it was smoke...
[Noble Quran 41:11]

Because the earth and the heavens above (the sun, moon, stars, planets, galaxies, etc.) have been formed from this same 'smoke' we conclude that the earth and the heavens were one connected entity. Then out of this homogeneous 'smoke', they formed and separated from each other. God said in the Quran:

Have not those who disbelieved known that the heavens and the earth were one connected entity, then We separated them?.. [Noble Quran 21:30]

Professor Alfred Kroner is one of the world's well-known geologists. He is a Professor of the Department of Geosciences, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany. He said, "Thinking where Muhammad came from .. I think it is almost impossible that he could have known about things like the common origin of the universe, because scientists have only found out within the last few years with very complicated and advance technological methods that this is the case." (From 'This is the Truth' [video]). Also he said, "Somebody who did not know something about nuclear physics fourteen hundred years ago could not, I think, be in a position to find out from his own mind, for instance, that the earth and the heavens had the same origin."

I MENTIONED SOME QURAN VERSUS U CAN OMIT THAT....IT IS REFERENCE OTHERS WHO IS WILLING TO SEE....

 

[pavithra_uk]

These Mother...f..kers ruin the sri lanka.

mewa nathi karanna kiyala apu haggedi karayo unta "" denawa..

 

[Mononoke]

What if someone called a 'scientist' tells you his 'theory' of how cars are made is like this:

A salvage yard on the south side of town blows up and all the metal pieces fly into the air and fall back down in one place forming a brand new Chevrolet Caprice automobile.. with no left over parts.. and the motor is running..

Or what if his theory for how a chair is made is:

An explosion occurs in a forest and the trees go flying into the air and then suddenly they combine with some flying cloth to make a beautiful chair... and then it lands in a furniture showroom complete with matching table and lamp...

He further explains that:

An earthquake in California's 'Silicon Valley' causes the computer chips and circuit boards and other various parts to fall out of their boxes and off of their shelves and just come in place together as they are rolling around on the floor and form the most advanced technical computers existing on the earth?...
AND...

No one works at "Burger Blast", it just runs itself, automatically cleaning itself and as you leave it scans your billfold for a valid credit card and charges your bank account for what you have eaten?...

Now the question is: "Are you really going to accept any of this as 'fact'?"

Of course not!

Of course not, Physics works according to laws. And no, your god did not give us these laws. If you say so show me the evidence. Show me sentience in Heisenberg?

The science of modern cosmology, observational and theoretical, clearly indicates that, at one point in time, the whole universe was nothing but a cloud of 'smoke' (i.e. an opaque highly dense and hot gaseous composition). This is one of the undisputed principles of standard modern cosmology.

Bullshit! it is fairly obvious that you don't know anything about the formation of the universe. There are several competing theories about the beginning of the universe, and none of them talk about a hot gases initial state. If you want specifics I can give you them. The 'smoky' stage of the universe you talk about comes much later on, about 400000 years into the universe. At that sate the universe had much lower densities as well as lower temperatures.

Scientists now can observe new stars forming out of the remnants of that 'smoke'. The illuminating stars we see at night were, just as was the whole universe, in that 'smoke' material.

What smoke material. Stars are not formed from remnants of the big bang. If you think nebula are made out of the 'smokey' material you talked about earlier you are wrong.

God said in the Quran:

Then He turned to the heavens when it was smoke...
[Noble Quran 41:11]

Because the earth and the heavens above (the sun, moon, stars, planets, galaxies, etc.) have been formed from this same 'smoke' we conclude that the earth and the heavens were one connected entity. Then out of this homogeneous 'smoke', they formed and separated from each other. God said in the Quran:

Have not those who disbelieved known that the heavens and the earth were one connected entity, then We separated them?.. [Noble Quran 21:30]

This smokey description of the universe was first given by Plato in his Timeus, a long time before Mohammad:

Timaeus continues with an explanation of the creation of the universe, which he ascribes to the handiwork of a divine Craftsman. The demiurge, being good, wanted there to be as much good as was the world. The demiurge is said to bring order out of subtance by imitating an unchanging and eternal model (paradigm). The ananke was the only other co-existent element or presence in Plato's cosmogony. Later Platonists clarified that the eternal model existed in the mind of the Demiurge.

Here he talks about making order out of a chaotic substance and creating the universe as we know it. Actually, Plato's description is much closer to physics. What is this nonsense about separating things? Nothing got separated, structures emerged or formed according to the laws of physics. It wasn't like God ripped the earth and the sun apart. It is fairly obvious that the Qu'ranic creation story falls light years short of actual science.

You use the word 'homogeneous', can you tell me exactly from where in the Qu'ran you got that word

 

[smallvilleclerk50]

Of course not, Physics works according to laws. And no, your god did not give us these laws. If you say so show me the evidence. Show me sentience in Heisenberg?


Bullshit! it is fairly obvious that you don't know anything about the formation of the universe. There are several competing theories about the beginning of the universe, and none of them talk about a hot gases initial state. If you want specifics I can give you them. The 'smoky' stage of the universe you talk about comes much later on, about 400000 years into the universe. At that sate the universe had much lower densities as well as lower temperatures.



What smoke material. Stars are not formed from remnants of the big bang. If you think nebula are made out of the 'smokey' material you talked about earlier you are wrong.



This smokey description of the universe was first given by Plato in his Timeus, a long time before Mohammad:



Here he talks about making order out of a chaotic substance and creating the universe as we know it. Actually, Plato's description is much closer to physics. What is this nonsense about separating things? Nothing got separated, structures emerged or formed according to the laws of physics. It wasn't like God ripped the earth and the sun apart. It is fairly obvious that the Qu'ranic creation story falls light years short of actual science.

You use the word 'homogeneous', can you tell me exactly from where in the Qu'ran you got that word

nailed

 

[smallvilleclerk50]

n a piece of advice, dont bring da quran in 2 science, its better u use it in a mythology/ failry tail lesn

 

[I love Srilanka]

Of course not, Physics works according to laws. And no, your god did not give us these laws. If you say so show me the evidence. Show me sentience in Heisenberg?

I also told No.

Bullshit! it is fairly obvious that you don't know anything about the formation of the universe. There are several competing theories about the beginning of the universe, and none of them talk about a hot gases initial state. If you want specifics I can give you them. The 'smoky' stage of the universe you talk about comes much later on, about 400000 years into the universe. At that sate the universe had much lower densities as well as lower temperatures.



What smoke material. Stars are not formed from remnants of the big bang. If you think nebula are made out of the 'smokey' material you talked about earlier you are wrong.



This smokey description of the universe was first given by Plato in his Timeus, a long time before Mohammad:

As far as i know plato's theory or dialogue was not established at that time.

Here he talks about making order out of a chaotic substance and creating the universe as we know it. Actually, Plato's description is much closer to physics. What is this nonsense about separating things? Nothing got separated, structures emerged or formed according to the laws of physics. It wasn't like God ripped the earth and the sun apart. It is fairly obvious that the Qu'ranic creation story falls light years short of actual science.

I dont have much knowledge about platos theory, i have to learn bit further..if it is not so,why Professor Alfred Kroner writes & appreciate the quran..Check the link..http://www.thisistruth.org/truth.php?f=OriginOfEarth of course professor kroner well learned than both of us

 

[Mononoke]

This smokey description of the universe was first given by Plato in his Timeus, a long time before Mohammad:

As far as i know plato's theory or dialogue was not established at that time.

Here he talks about making order out of a chaotic substance and creating the universe as we know it. Actually, Plato's description is much closer to physics. What is this nonsense about separating things? Nothing got separated, structures emerged or formed according to the laws of physics. It wasn't like God ripped the earth and the sun apart. It is fairly obvious that the Qu'ranic creation story falls light years short of actual science.

I dont have much knowledge about platos theory, i have to learn bit further..if it is not so,why Professor Alfred Kroner writes & appreciate the quran..Check the link..http://www.thisistruth.org/truth.php?f=OriginOfEarth of course professor kroner well learned than both of us

Firstly, Plato was well established a long time, almost 1000 years, before Islam.

Professor Kroner, sadly, is clearly in the wrong here. He is reading way too much into an ambiguous fairly tale. I take it he hasn't read things like this in the Qu'ran

"... Until when he [Dhul-Qarnayn] reached the setting of the Sun, he found it set in a spring of murky water. Near it he found a People ..." (Qur'an 18:86)

The sun setting in murky water.

I am waiting for response about plato.

 

[njsa]

ok can u prove the world is made by god?? scientifically???
[ dont drag quran quotes 2 prove it]
and 4 the record, im not interested in ur quran lesn, hw many memorize it and all.

ok first tell that is it possible that a person told scientific facts 1400 years ago which proved to be correct recently.and the most important thing is there is no any single mistake . what is ur opinion so we can discuss further.

 

[I love Srilanka]

Firstly, Plato was well established a long time, almost 1000 years, before Islam.

Professor Kroner, sadly, is clearly in the wrong here. He is reading way too much into an ambiguous fairly tale. I take it he hasn't read things like this in the Qu'ran
The sun setting in murky water.

I am waiting for response about plato.

1st you prove me plato's dialogue or theory when it was proved to be fact,You are telling it was established almost 1000 years,before islam.Quran was revealed 1400years ago.not 1000 years ago.
in a summary.give me following details
1-Pleatos theory with the correct proof which is exactly matching with Quran give me correct quoting in the lights of Quran.
2-Platos theory when it was estabilised..prove me....

I am waiting for your exact reply to reply you.

 

[njsa]

Firstly, Plato was well established a long time, almost 1000 years, before Islam.

Professor Kroner, sadly, is clearly in the wrong here. He is reading way too much into an ambiguous fairly tale. I take it he hasn't read things like this in the Qu'ran
The sun setting in murky water.

I am waiting for response about plato.

u cant judge anyone because there are many things in science which comes with myths and personal opinion. and if u ask about the universe present there will be an exact answer but u are talking about the beginning of universe and there are many different opinion regard it. i think its same as evaluation. where u cant get a exact reply.so u cant comment on professor Koner is clearly wrong.

but there are things in science proved as facts such as
embryology-
http://www.islamology.org/Overview/Science/Embroyology.htm

Keith L. Moore is a professor emeritus in the division of anatomy (department of surgery), former Chair of anatomy and associate dean for Basic Medical Sciences (Faculty of Medicine) at the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. He has also worked at the King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. He is most known for his textbooks on the subjects of anatomy and human embryology.

"It has been a great pleasure for me to help clarify statements in the Quran about human development. It is clear to me that these statements must have come to Muhammad from God, or Allah, because most of this knowledge was not discovered until many centuries later. This proves to me that Muhammad must have been a messenger .u can watch his video.
(http://www.scienceislam.com/scientists_quran.php)

water cycle-
http://jesussecondcoming.blogspot.com/2009/01/water-cycle-in-quran.html

ocenology- barrier bitween sweet and bitter water
http://www.geocities.com/aahem187/ocenology.htm

like this there are many things proved correct in quran.and no single mistake.
so as u said there were people that time with differnt opinions regard all these issues but how prophet mentioned all which only is accurate.

its mentioned in bible that the world is flat but its mentioned in quran that


Earth is geo-spherical in shape

The Quran mentions the actual shape of the earth in the following verse: “And we have made the earth egg shaped”. [Al-Quran 79:30]

The Arabic word Dahaha means egg shaped. It also means an expanse. Dahaha is derived from Duhiya which specifically refers to the egg of an ostrich which is geo-spherical in shape, exactly like the shape of the earth.

Thus the Quran and modern established science are in perfect harmony.


Mountains

In geology, modern science has recently discovered the phenomenon of folding which formed the mountain ranges. The earth's crust is like a solid shell, while the deeper layers are hot and fluid, and thus inhospitable to any form of life. It has also been discovered that the stability of mountains is linked to the phenomenon of folding. The process of mountain formation by folding drove the earth's crust down into the lower layers and provided foundations for the mountains.

Let us now compare modern ideas with one verse among many in the Qur'an that deals with this subject. It is taken from chapter an-Naba':

"Have We not made the earth an expanse and the mountains stakes?"

Qur'an, 78:6-7

Stakes ( awtaad ), which are driven into the ground like those used to anchor a tent, are the deep foundations of geological folds.

Here, as in the case of all the other topics presented, the objective observer cannot fail to notice the absence of any contradiction to modern knowledge.


THE THING THAT WE SHOULD BELIEVE OF EXISTENCE OF GOD IS BECAUSE PROPHET WAS AN ILLITERATE PERSON. SO THERE IS NO WAY HE MADE A QURAN ON HIS OWN WITHOUT A SINGLE MISTAKE.

if u want to get some idea of this u can watch one dialogue between dr william campbel and zakir naik.even u dont believe it will be interesting for u to watch.
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=william+campbell&emb=0#
Francis Bacon, the famous philosopher, has rightly said that a little knowledge of science makes man an atheist, but an in-depth study of science makes him a believer in God. Scientists today are eliminating models of God, but they are not eliminating God. If you translate this into Arabic, it is La illaha illal la, There is no god, (god with a small ‘g’ that is fake god) but God (with a capital ‘G’).

 

[Mononoke]

1st you prove me plato's dialogue or theory when it was proved to be fact,You are telling it was established almost 1000 years,before islam.Quran was revealed 1400years ago.not 1000 years ago.
in a summary.give me following details
1-Pleatos theory with the correct proof which is exactly matching with Quran give me correct quoting in the lights of Quran.
2-Platos theory when it was estabilised..prove me....

I am waiting for your exact reply to reply you.

Platos story was a creation story, just like your one. It's just a story it was never fact, just like yours. But it seems like both your story and Plato's story is similar, is Plato one of the lost disciples. There no prrof of anything in Quran, just vague ramblings.

 

[njsa]

Platos story was a creation story, just like your one. It's just a story it was never fact, just like yours. But it seems like both your story and Plato's story is similar, is Plato one of the lost disciples. There no prrof of anything in Quran, just vague ramblings.

i dont think u can simply ignore the quran . becoz there are many things proved to be 100% correct. from quran 75 % correct means we believe that othere 25% will be proved to be correct. there are many facts mentioned in quran if u really interest to know refer those links and hope u can gain some knowledge.

 

[I love Srilanka]

Platos story was a creation story, just like your one. It's just a story it was never fact, just like yours. But it seems like both your story and Plato's story is similar, is Plato one of the lost disciples. There no prrof of anything in Quran, just vague ramblings.

Dear Mononoke,
Thanks for saying correctly platos theory is story.even if it is fact we dont have any problem, because before quran many said many theories only some of them established as fact now.
I wonder Quran is always matching with established fact.even if some one argue Quran is copied from some one's theory I can counter Question you why Quran is copying only established facts, why it was not copied the theory which is proved to be wrong now.
Alhamdulillah...until now Quran is matching with all established scientific facts.

 

[fah777]

owa post kerela jaathee bedaya athikeranne epa bun... kollaney

kawadat mey lankawa budu deseyak ney...

apey % eka ney wadi ... athharala dapan kolloney
api godanunwemu ekamutu lankaawak !!!!

 

[Mononoke]

u cant judge anyone because there are many things in science which comes with myths and personal opinion. and if u ask about the universe present there will be an exact answer but u are talking about the beginning of universe and there are many different opinion regard it. i think its same as evaluation. where u cant get a exact reply.so u cant comment on professor Koner is clearly wrong.

but there are things in science proved as facts such as
embryology-
http://www.islamology.org/Overview/Science/Embroyology.htm

Quranic Embryology is two things. Firstly, it is inaccurate. Secondly, it is blatant plagiarism.

For the inadequacies watch this, I assume someone like 'Wal Bada', who is doctor will give you a more indepth analysis.

Now for the plagiarism. Embryology is nothing new. Greeks, Romans, Indians and Persians all studied embryology by studying aborted fetuses. Quranic embryology is just mindless aping of that knowledge.

Here is some work done by Galen of Pergamum(AD 129-200/217). Pay close attention to the highlighted bits and their Quranic analogues

But let us take the account back again to the first conformation of the animal, and in order to make our account orderly and clear, let us divide the creation of the foetus overall into four periods of time. The first is that in which. as is seen both in abortions and in dissection, the form of the semen prevails (Arabic nutfah). At this time, Hippocrates too, the all-marvelous, does not yet call the conformation of the animal a foetus; as we heard just now in the case of semen voided in the sixth day, he still calls it semen. But when it has been filled with blood (Arabic alaqa), and heart, brain and liver are still unarticulated and unshaped yet have by now a certain solidarity and considerable size, this is the second period; the substance of the foetus has the form of flesh and no longer the form of semen. Accordingly you would find that Hippocrates too no longer calls such a form semen but, as was said, foetus. The third period follows on this, when, as was said, it is possible to see the three ruling parts clearly and a kind of outline, a silhouette, as it were, of all the other parts (Arabic mudghah). You will see the conformation of the three ruling parts more clearly, that of the parts of the stomach more dimly, and much more still, that of the limbs. Later on they form "twigs", as Hippocrates expressed it, indicating by the term their similarity to branches. The fourth and final period is at the stage when all the parts in the limbs have been differentiated; and at this part Hippocrates the marvelous no longer calls the foetus an embryo only, but already a child, too when he says that it jerks and moves as an animal now fully formed (Arabic ‘a new creation’) ...

... The time has come for nature to articulate the organs precisely and to bring all the parts to completion. Thus it caused flesh to grow on and around all the bones, and at the same time ... it made at the ends of the bones ligaments that bind them to each other, and along their entire length it placed around them on all sides thin membranes, called periosteal, on which it caused flesh to grow

And Now for the Qur'an

Then fashioned We the drop a clot, then fashioned We the clot a little lump, then fashioned We the little lump bones, then clothed the bones with flesh, and then produced it as another creation. So blessed be Allah, the Best of creators!

Shame, Shame!

water cycle-
http://jesussecondcoming.blogspot.com/2009/01/water-cycle-in-quran.html

ocenology- barrier bitween sweet and bitter water
http://www.geocities.com/aahem187/ocenology.htm

You must be one stupid race of people to think that you need a divine revelation to figure out the water cycle. Sri Lankans knew about the water cycle along time before the Quran, and without any divine guidence. The water cycle is also prominent in Greek studies. I guess some people really do need miracles.

Earth is geo-spherical in shape

The Quran mentions the actual shape of the earth in the following verse: “And we have made the earth egg shaped”. [Al-Quran 79:30]

The Arabic word Dahaha means egg shaped. It also means an expanse. Dahaha is derived from Duhiya which specifically refers to the egg of an ostrich which is geo-spherical in shape, exactly like the shape of the earth.

Thus the Quran and modern established science are in perfect harmony.

Another act of gross plagerism. The Greeks knew the world was spherical a full 1000 years before your prophet was born, they even knew the distance between the sun and earth to within Kilometers. The Indians knew about the spherical earth from the time of the Veda's way back in 1000BC.
How did they know these things. Not through divine postulating but through observations and simple maths.

Mohammed being a trader obviously came into contact with elements of greek and indian culture. Having heard these stories from them Mohammed decided to fool a bunch of desert nomads. Brilliant plan I must say.

Mountains

In geology, modern science has recently discovered the phenomenon of folding which formed the mountain ranges. The earth's crust is like a solid shell, while the deeper layers are hot and fluid, and thus inhospitable to any form of life. It has also been discovered that the stability of mountains is linked to the phenomenon of folding. The process of mountain formation by folding drove the earth's crust down into the lower layers and provided foundations for the mountains.

Let us now compare modern ideas with one verse among many in the Qur'an that deals with this subject. It is taken from chapter an-Naba':

"Have We not made the earth an expanse and the mountains stakes?"

Qur'an, 78:6-7

Stakes ( awtaad ), which are driven into the ground like those used to anchor a tent, are the deep foundations of geological folds.

What are you talking about this is completely non sequitur .

Here, as in the case of all the other topics presented, the objective observer cannot fail to notice the absence of any contradiction to modern knowledge.

No, here is a case of blatant plagiarism. Every branch of Koranic Science is a cheap derivative of Greek or Indian science.

 

[njsa]

accepting or deny it totally up to u. but there are scientist who testified the accuracy of quran.u can watch the videos.

http://www.scienceislam.com/scientists_quran.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_L._Moore


if walabada studied in the the field of embryology there is no doubt that he had read the books of professor keith moore.(watch his video too)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V61JNF49QUU

u dont want reference from quran,not from scientist.i think its a rubbish that u dont believe the comment of professor keith moore regard embroyology. this shows ur ignorance brother.

Mohammed being a trader obviously came into contact with elements of greek and indian culture. Heard these stories from them and dicided to fool a bunch of desert nomads. Brilliant plan I must say.

y prophet(illitarate) copied the things which only are accurate. there were many opinian regard at that time. not only that the world is round. so y he picked only the correct one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSOd_NU1_-w&feature=related

ur wrong brother.,so whats the point in giving proof for u. u are not ready to agree with any scientist which we mention so for u ur way and for us ours.anyway keep on searching!!!

 

[njsa]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLFy16zyUbQ&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egDYF_oQ4yc&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUA_G5-2KVI&NR=1


Quran and the mistery of iron

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4k4Jdl9RZFI&feature=related



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjKGlNVmnqc&feature=related

 

[Idi Amin]

Don't be an utter fool. Muslims came nearly 1000 years after Buddhists. And we don't have any ancestors from Tibet. And Muslim rulers were shit scared even to set foot in Sri Lanka because they knew their history unlike you, that even great Chola emperors army was made to run on their shit by ancient Lankans. Learn your history first before lying in the forums. Your lies only will be taken serious by brainwashed fools.

Try telling that to the Portugese,Dutch and the British...