Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="just" data-source="post: 1741284" data-attributes="member: 61659">i dont know about you.but I feel really good about this, to reach this far…I should say this must be one of the farst points I could go with a Buddhist. And should be frank I personally had a negative picture of you after our 1st discussion and I think I was not correct, now.     I know we couldn’t find answers to any burning cosmological questions but I expected it. but what I wanted to know is can a discussion about religion go to end without the usual bashing and thrashings. don’t think its useless cos just as the interview in the start I know it has triggered questions and maybe that could trigger thinking which we both can agree a good thing.     Of cos there were a negative side as well but I think that’s the way it is, but I really feel good..  OK this is where it should end up for sure.. Yes obviously following my arguments will show I never can accept the theory of “SOMETHING CAME FROM NOTHING” personally, it seems unscientific and illogical to me in every possible way. Maybe even you think so according to this statement…MAYBE NOT...   Uh the chimp thing you missed my statement I guess.”on its own” doesn’t mean sandwiching one into rocket and shooting to space…that’s ok people still make mistakes I no…     Anyways finally I need some points cleared hope you’ll have time for this too. Since we came this far it wouldn’t be complete without these…     You said all elements consist of 4 things.     What about these stuff, spirit, soul, sense (not thinking), feelings (science thinks its chemical reactions)..  You believe these are part of evolution?   Science totally rejects soul that I know cos doesn’t serve any purpose.   Buddhism supports or opposes it? why?  What are they made of, Elements consisting of above 4 things?      Thanks</blockquote>

Verification: Dawasata paya keeyak thibeda?

Top Bottom