It is a suicide mission like Sep11, 2001 (9/11) attack in the US

Aug 19, 2008
11,653
167
0
Sri Lanka
Air Tigers were on '9/11' mission
NO%20TAG.jpg

396_air_200902210012.jpg
The two-light wing LTTE aircraft which attacked Colombo last night were on a suicide mission similar to the September 11, 2001 (9/11) attack in the US. The military meanwhile said that one pilot, whose body was found intact in Katunayake, had a large quantity of explosives and bombs inside the aircraft.

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
 

madurax86

Member
Jun 29, 2006
4,385
88
0
AtulaSiriwardane said:


This is like ITN trying to copy Sirasa. Pathetic.

:yes:

yeah ITN isnt stupid, slutty as sirasa
and LTTE arent dumb and freaked out like US Forces :P

Our forces are better than both hehe
 
Aug 19, 2008
11,653
167
0
Sri Lanka
I think it is inviting insult by trying to relate it to 9/11 because there are many in the USA who thinks that it is an inside job...
It is a bad move especially when people have doubt over the 2nd plane crash, dissapearence of the pilot etc.
911.jpg


THE TOP 40

REASONS TO DOUBT THE OFFICIAL STORY OF SEPTEMBER 11th, 2001

... An outline in simple talking points ...


We are continuing to compile the best documentation links for every single point on this page, and intend to post the updated version as soon as possible, and create teaching tools and more from the info. This is a significant and time-consuming process--if you have useful links, please send them to janice[at]911truth[dot]org. Thanks for your help!
If you use the search function with title key words, you will discover that 911Truth.org is home to articles backing virtually every point made below. Much of the basic research is available at the Complete 9/11 Timeline (hosted by cooperativeresearch.org), the 9/11 Reading Room (911readingroom.org), and the NY Attorney General Spitzer petition and complaint (Justicefor911.org). For physical evidence discussion, see Point 7.

I know many members of EK don't like to read.
But for you who are inquisitive.
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646
 
Aug 19, 2008
11,653
167
0
Sri Lanka
madurax86 said:
yeah ITN isnt stupid, slutty as sirasa
and LTTE arent dumb and freaked out like US Forces :P

Our forces are better than both hehe

Oh Yes...
LTTE is the
MOST TERRIBLE TERRORIST ORGANZATION.
And our forces better than them.


:lol:
 
Aug 19, 2008
11,653
167
0
Sri Lanka

911truth.jpg


reichstagmyspacesmsc2.gif


The following images were taken during and after the fire at the Madrid Windsor Tower, which burned at temperatures of 800 celcius and for over 18 hours (AFP). The core of this building did not fail and the building remained standing.

madridfiressd6.jpg


Below are images of a government building in Caracas, Venezuela which burned for 17 hours in October 2004. This building is Venezuela's highest skyscraper and suffered the destruction of the top twenty of its fifty floors yet the building still did not collapse.

venezfiressmcl3.jpg


Yet, here are images of World Trade Centre 7, a 47 story steel framed building, which having suffered fires only on a few floors on September 11, 2001, collapsed symetrically at virtually free fall speed and neatly into its own footprint - achievable only using carefully placed explosives.

Please bear in mind the following facts;

- BUILDING 7 WAS NOT HIT BY AN AIRPLANE

- NO STEEL FRAMED HIGH RISE BUILDING HAS EVER COLLAPSED DUE TO FIRE.


wt7firesfy5.jpg


So..er...maybe this can explain it (click image to view)



The term "pull" is used in the controlled demolition industry to refer to the bringing down of a building using explosives. This would certainly explain the various features of the collapse.

This kind of project would require weeks, at the very least, to plan and to place the charges in a manner that would result in the neat pile we can witness above. This specialist skill can only be carried out by a small number of controlled demolition companies and, all things considered, it is completely unreasonable to suggest that this is the work of Al-Qaeda alone.

One of the arguments that critics of the official account often face when trying to encourage others to research the alternative theories of the events of 9/11 is the suggestion that the conspiracy is just too large: it would require too many people involved to ensure that it remained a secret. This is not necessarily the case, primarily due to the compartmentalization of the various governmental departments, the military and intelligence. Those that are not privy to the real agenda, will merely continue to do their jobs in the belief they are doing what is right, whilst the key decision makers and propagandists will have been carefully placed in those positions in order to carry out the real agenda and help maintain the public myth.

In the case of the unprecedented, sudden collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, and whilst it so obviously implicates obvious involvement outside of Al-Qaeda, many people may still refuse to take their research any further due to the main question that this raises and the subsequent "can of worms" that is opened - for example, how would a group of people be able to place the large amount of explosives required for such a demolition weeks before the attacks and all whilst out of the sight of security?

So which company was responsible for the security of the World Trade Center complex leading up to 9/11?
marvinbushfx5.gif

 
Last edited: