NASA Nancy Grace Roman Telescope lifts off.

imhotep

Well-known member
  • Mar 29, 2017
    14,868
    8
    35,471
    113
    Named after NASA’s first chief astronomer, the ‘mother of the Hubble Space Telescope,’ the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope will have a field of view at least 100 times larger than Hubble's, potentially measuring light from a billion galaxies in its lifetime. This observatory will also be able to block starlight to directly see exoplanets and planet-forming disks, complete a statistical census of planetary systems in our galaxy, and settle essential questions in the areas of dark energy, exoplanets, and infrared astrophysics.

    Roman will orbit 1 million miles away at the second Sun-Earth Lagrange point (L2), the same location as NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope. At L2, gravity from the Sun and Earth works together with an object’s motion around the Sun to hold it roughly in place. This balance will give Roman a relatively steady orbit without using much fuel.

    Like Webb, Roman will trace out a large orbit around the actual L2 point — much larger than the Moon’s orbit around Earth — and the two will easily be kept far apart.

    The observatory’s Wide Field Instrument is a 300-megapixel infrared camera that will give Roman the same sharpness (angular resolution) as Hubble but with a field of view at least 100 times larger. Using this instrument, each Roman image will capture a patch of the sky about 1.5 times bigger than the apparent size of a full Moon.

    Roman’s Coronagraph Instrument is designed to demonstrate the most advanced technologies ever flown in space for directly imaging planets around other stars. It will block the glare from stars and make it possible for scientists to see the faint reflected light from planets in orbit around them, revealing giant worlds that are older, colder, and in closer orbits than the hot, young super-Jupiters direct imaging has mainly revealed so far.
     

    Inigo Montoya

    Well-known member
  • Nov 15, 2025
    7,633
    14,736
    113
    35
    Spain
    පොලවට ආසන්න කක්ෂයක රඳවලා තියනවා වෙනුවට නෙප්චූන් වගේ ග්‍රහයෙක් ගාව රඳවලා තිව්වොත් වඩා හොඳ ෆොටෝ ලැබෙයි නේද. මොකද හිරුගෙන් එන විකිරණ සහ ආලෝකය සෑහෙන අඩුයි නේ ඒ හරියේ?
     

    UbeThaththa

    Well-known member
  • Apr 15, 2025
    3,898
    5,131
    113

    ChatGPT:

    Roman vs. JWST​

    James Webb (JWST)Nancy Grace Roman
    Main strengthDeep, detailed observationsHuge surveys of the sky
    Mirror6.5 m2.4 m
    Field of viewRelatively small~100× larger
    WavelengthInfraredOptical + near-infrared
    Best forIndividual galaxies, stars, exoplanet atmospheresDark energy, dark matter, billions of galaxies
    LocationSun–Earth L2Sun–Earth L2
    Launch2021Planned no earlier than May 2027

    🌌 The big difference​

    Think of them as a powerful microscope vs. a wide-angle camera.

    JWST can look at a relatively small patch of sky and examine it in extraordinary detail. That's why it's so good at studying things like the atmospheres of exoplanets and extremely distant early galaxies.

    Roman will see a much larger area of sky in each observation. Its major mission is to survey enormous portions of the universe to investigate dark energy, dark matter, galaxy evolution and exoplanets.

    So Roman isn't really "JWST but better." In fact, JWST has a much larger primary mirror and will generally be better for very faint, detailed infrared observations.

    But Roman will be far better at mapping huge areas of the universe quickly.

    And the really exciting part is that they're intended to work together: Roman can find interesting objects across huge areas, and JWST can then zoom in on selected targets for detailed study.
     

    topkollek

    Well-known member
  • May 22, 2014
    44,020
    1
    58,334
    113
    ┬┴┬┴┤(·_├┬┴┬┴
    පොලවට ආසන්න කක්ෂයක රඳවලා තියනවා වෙනුවට නෙප්චූන් වගේ ග්‍රහයෙක් ගාව රඳවලා තිව්වොත් වඩා හොඳ ෆොටෝ ලැබෙයි නේද. මොකද හිරුගෙන් එන විකිරණ සහ ආලෝකය සෑහෙන අඩුයි නේ ඒ හරියේ?
    Solar Panels Good Job GIF by Proven Energy