Brute force wage method ekakin password ekin eka gahala check karala balanna puluwan hariyanawada kiyala. Kalak yayi ithin.SHA කියන්නෙ encryption එකක් ද යකෝ decrypt කරන්න..
hashing algorithm එකක් නෙ ඒක..
Kalak yayi ithin.

Brute force wage method ekakin password ekin eka gahala check karala balanna puluwan hariyanawada kiyala. Kalak yayi ithin.
කොයි වගේ කාලයක්ද සාමාන්යයෙන් දහයේ බල වලින් කිවුවොත්![]()
![]()
Ekath password eka anuwa wenas wenawa neda...කොයි වගේ කාලයක්ද සාමාන්යයෙන් දහයේ බල වලින් කිවුවොත්![]()
![]()
Ekath password eka anuwa wenas wenawa neda...
Mama me thread ekata 1st reply eka danakota hithagena hitiye password store karanna sha512 hodayi kiyala. Dan nam sure naha.
Meka depend neda..?ඒකට තමයි salt එක add කරන්නෙ..
මේ ආත්මෙදි කඩන්න පුළුවන් කියලද උබ හිතන් ඉන්නෙ ?

You can speculate about how safe or unsafe various algorithms are, but why bother when you have a spec the U.S. government considers good enough for its own use?
[edit]
By the way, your question appears to reflect a misunderstanding about how these analyses are performed. There is much more to a hash function than its number of bits.
Brute-forcing a 160-bit hash like SHA-1 requires 2^160 effort; that is simply not going to happen, no matter how many "GPUs" you throw at it. In fact it probably will not happen in the lifetime of the universe. (True, brute-forcing a collision requires "only" 2^80 effort. But it also requires 2^80 storage. Good luck with that.)