Anusha said:every drive is different men. F1's work give that sort of graph.
F1's are great. But mostly the 334GB per platter drives show the true awesomeness of F1's.fallenzeraphine said:but it should be smooth or it means its bloody slow because its dropping speed every few seconds..seems the F1 really suckz cause my HD250HJ doesnt do this
Anusha said:XP ne. Can't you see that from the screenshot?
Anyway, the "mode" will not change the transfer rate graph.
I still can't believe how the 250HJ beats the 252HJ![]()
could be the xp wallaper..
i thought native SATA mode gets higher transfer rate? isnt it? A friend told me tht XP simulates SATA as default and it couldnt achive actual speeds of the HDDs??Native SATA mode (i.e. AHCI) brings two things to the party:shanX said:could be the xp wallaper..
i thought native SATA mode gets higher transfer rate? isnt it? A friend told me tht XP simulates SATA as default and it couldnt achive actual speeds of the HDDs??
) - 2 yrs usage
) - 4 yrs usage
You shouldn't have got that model. It is an old family. You should have gone with 250HJ. 251HJ or 252HJ.yashan said:What's about mine?
zCexVe said:AFAIK he has a nVIDIA chipset.With nVIDIA chipsets harddisk transfer rates are lower compared to other.No matter what you do they have lower transfer rates.One drawback in nVIDIA chipsets.
Anusha said:Don't compare with KZRO's screenshot.
Compare it with this.
fallenzeraphine said:damn i havent posted mine here, nwayz, the HD250HJ scores 105~108 MBps Maximum Read speed, 68~70 MBps Minimum read speed, Burst Rate is 215~150MBps (its 200s on the Jmicron Controller) this is on ICH9 southbridge, ofcource Depending on the SATA controller, but very slightly, Burstrate can go really bonkers but other rates stay very close what i achived here all the time, look at Anushas and Gayans screenies, ur Transfer rates look pretty weird indeed sasika, 40ish minimum is not that good, and ur burst rate is really bonkers mate...u should stick the HDD on another PC and check it maybe its defective. plus the Curve should be pretty smooth, but look at urs its spiking every few seconds, KZRO's is worse must be sumthing with the controller
Maybe the HDD was in use when he ran the benchmark.Sasika@Elakiri said:KZRO n gayannr both have the same HDD ne? bt why there is a huge difference?

There is no problem with your drive. That is the curve you get for F1s.Sasika@Elakiri said:Yes i will chk, i think the chipset matters most probably.
curve is not smooth bt is it really spikin ? i see flat ends. i thought this way the better, coz its stable right?
thanks
KWlAnusha said:Native SATA mode (i.e. AHCI) brings two things to the party:
1. NCQ, which increases the throughput of the disk, not the raw sequential read/write speeds.
2. Hot swapping.


AHCI should be enabled from BIOS. BIOS defaults set it to IDE mode for all mobos as far as I know.shanX said:KWl
so is AHCI enabled by default for SATA HDDs within XP?![]()