Should Athula Siriwardane be banned from EK?

[Wal Bada]

err ? you wanna explain that ? that's a news item from DM in that link.
This news article : http://www.dailymirror.lk/DM_BLOG/Sections/frmNewsDetailView.aspx?ARTID=47775

Saying Err Errr Errrrr won't help. His earlier posts like this were proven to be lies by the GOSL/SLA, and he did not even apologize for posting that. If Atula posts some news from a selected source, he's responsible for the correctness of it.

 

[rangaboss]

Because EK doesnt follow a Government supporting gang agenda

ALSO EK DOESN'T FOLLOW A LTTE SUPPORTING AGENDA OR A CAMPAIGN EITHER>>> SO YOUR HAVE NOT PROVED ANYTHING WITH REGARDING TO THE QUESTION "WHY NOT BAN HIM?" IMO HE SEEMS SUPPORTING LTTE . IT IS NOT FARE THAT HE GETS BANNED FOR SUPPORTING UNP.. BUT SUPPORTING LTTE IS NOT A THING THAT CAN BE APPRECIATED BY ANYBODY .. SO MY POINT IS HE SHOULD BE BANNED , BUT THERE IS NO WAY THAT WE CAN BLOCK HIM USING ANOTHER USER NAME AND CONTINUING HIS WORK.......>>>> IT SHOULD ALSO BE EMPHASYS THAT THRE IS NO DEMOCRACY TO THOSE LTTE F****ERS>>>>

 

[rangaboss]

Saying Err Errr Errrrr won't help. His earlier posts like this were proven to be lies by the GOSL/SLA, and he did not even apologize for posting that. If Atula posts some news from a selected source, he's responsible for the correctness of it.

 

[kosandpol]

Saying Err Errr Errrrr won't help. His earlier posts like this were proven to be lies by the GOSL/SLA, and he did not even apologize for posting that. If Atula posts some news from a selected source, he's responsible for the correctness of it.

has he modified the news article in any way in that other thread ? He has pasted it verbatim from the DM article....

...
...
wait a second!
Why the f*ck am I defending his each and every action anyway ??
He can defend his actions if he chooses to do so. I'm out of here.

 

[danny01]

He should not.

Expressing opinions doesn't mean that he's anti or pro.

Readers should be intelligent to grab what is intelligent and ignore what is crap.

 

[rangaboss]

redda thama.... ookawa banned karanna one aniwa.....
para kotiya....

 

[asachan]

This fellow has been posting pro-LTTE stuff for a long time. What would you suggest?

Edit:

1. Shells hit hospital in no-fire zone

2. Now we have a strong excuse to continue war

3. United Nations allegations -Security forces shelled a civilian area.


4. Army had used so far heavy guns -combat aircraft that could cause civilian casualties

5. UK to probe crimes against civilians in Sri Lanka

6. Lanka govt 'more at fault' than LTTE

In all these threads, the headings are very provocative. In some so is the text. When you search a clause in Google, what appears is these headings, not the text.

Anti Athula Club

 

[asachan]

He should not.

Expressing opinions doesn't mean that he's anti or pro.

Readers should be intelligent to grab what is intelligent and ignore what is crap.

Rata rata Athulath ekka set wenawada?

 

[twisted]

ALSO EK DOESN'T FOLLOW A LTTE SUPPORTING AGENDA OR A CAMPAIGN EITHER>>> SO YOUR HAVE NOT PROVED ANYTHING WITH REGARDING TO THE QUESTION "WHY NOT BAN HIM?" IMO HE SEEMS SUPPORTING LTTE . IT IS NOT FARE THAT HE GETS BANNED FOR SUPPORTING UNP.. BUT SUPPORTING LTTE IS NOT A THING THAT CAN BE APPRECIATED BY ANYBODY .. SO MY POINT IS HE SHOULD BE BANNED , BUT THERE IS NO WAY THAT WE CAN BLOCK HIM USING ANOTHER USER NAME AND CONTINUING HIS WORK.......>>>> IT SHOULD ALSO BE EMPHASYS THAT THRE IS NO DEMOCRACY TO THOSE LTTE F****ERS>>>>

if he supports ltte he should be banned otherwise he should be let alone and respected ..that's all to it so where does it say that he supports ltte

 

[twisted]

Anti Athula Club

are you stupid or what ? endless scrolling don't spam ..one pic would have been enough if it was necessary in the first place

 

[rangaboss]

He should not.

Expressing opinions doesn't mean that he's anti or pro.

Readers should be intelligent to grab what is intelligent and ignore what is crap.

YOU MEAN EXPRESSING OPINIONS BIAS TO THOSE LTTE FU**erS IS OK ?

DO YOU KNOW EXPRESSING A WRONG THING EVERY TIME WILL MAKE IT A TRUE IN PEOPLE'S MIND SO >>>>>>>>>> WE SHOULD AVOID THOSE KINDS OF COMMENTS

 

[twisted]

DO YOU KNOW EXPRESSING A WRONG THING EVERY TIME WILL MAKE IT A TRUE IN PEOPLE'S MIND SO

which branded him ltte in the first place

 

[danny01]

YOU MEAN EXPRESSING OPINIONS BIAS TO THOSE LTTE FU**erS IS OK ?

DO YOU KNOW EXPRESSING A WRONG THING EVERY TIME WILL MAKE IT A TRUE IN PEOPLE'S MIND SO >>>>>>>>>> WE SHOULD AVOID THOSE KINDS OF COMMENTS

I believe only what I see.

All (or most) of the above threads mentioned by walbada are taken from other websites from atula and posted with a provoking title.

So from them, one cannot define whether he's pro LTTE or anti LTTE.

Also, there are many places in the internet which express pro LTTE propaganda.

From what I see, he is anti government and not pro LTTE.

Anyway I'm not here to defend anybody peace-out.

 

[kosandpol]

which branded him ltte in the first place

Everyone is equal. Some are more equal than others.

 

[rangaboss]

if he supports ltte he should be banned otherwise he should be let alone and respected ..that's all to it so where does it say that he supports ltte

THAT IS WHY I SAID IMO (IN MY OPINION) IN MY EARLY POST >>> SO I DON'T THINK YOU ARE THAT FOOL TO UNDERSTAND THAT HE HAS SOME HIDDEN AGENDA GOING ON !!

 

[twisted]

I DON'T THINK YOU ARE THAT FOOL TO UNDERSTAND THAT HE HAS SOME HIDDEN AGENDA GOING ON !!

exactly

 

[twisted]

Everyone is equal. Some are more equal than others.

 

[rangaboss]

exactly

 

[Wal Bada]

He should not.

Expressing opinions doesn't mean that he's anti or pro.

Readers should be intelligent to grab what is intelligent and ignore what is crap.

Freedom for expressing opinions is not unlimited. He is crossing the boundries for sure.You can't shout in ublic with filth saying that people will ignore your filth if they don't want to listen.

 

[life]

He supports the LTTE terroristsm
So my opinion is "HE SHOULD BE BANNED"