twisted said:i saw him repeating the same thing to you too
You are one of the few elakirians
with awareness.

with awareness.

twisted said:i saw him repeating the same thing to you too

Wal Bada said:Anyway, Athula don't distract about the main topic. You are posting anti-SLA content, which is not liked by the majority.


I think in my threads about Army, mostly the politicians are pointed out.sri_lion said:Athula, probably the first time I'm talking to you seriously!
Its very clear you are a UNP supporter and I'm a govt. supporter!
So both of us understand where we are and I understand you have a right to criticize the govt. as much as I have a right to criticize the opposition, so the feeling is mutual!
But keep the Army out of it, please... because you know well there were UNP govts. SLFP Govts. they all ruled the country but one thing never changed, our boys in the front lines have always died,
Did they care who ruled the country? Did they say because Premadasa rules they cannot go to WAR? or Chandrika?
So they don't deserve all your pun... EK don't welcome Pro-LTTE sources, GTRZ have banned 100's of them Pro-LTTE supporters posting stuff in this forum over the years, you can ask him If I'm lying!
But we do welcome meaningful discussions with Pro-LTTE people in here, so whoever you are come with a point... lets talk!

AtulaSiriwardane said:I think in my threads about Army, mostly the politicians are pointed out.
I don't think that Army is responsible for many things which Army get the blame.
Sometimes it sounds like Army had done something wrong..
See this.
Civilians are cornered with LTTE terrorists into some 5-10 SQ KMs.
Govt. orders Army to stop heavy weapons.
It indicates that Army had been using them till then. In another words Army had been using till Govt said No.
Who is the real wrong doer. In my opinion... it can be the Govt. or it can be Army. But I don't say my opinion in the thread. I just bring the news and say 'What it indicates to me.'
Because I want to see what others think.
But many are not ready to discuss.. They need everybody else to clap with them.
And some has the notion that even Army does go wrong we should not talk about it. Do you stand up for them.?
If you are not against a problem you are part of the problem.
Use this line and ask your next question.
අබ කෑ මිනිහගෙ මොලේ දනවාපුහුල් හොරා කරෙන් දැනේ
UN accused by Govt of spying on Sri Lanka
The government has accused the United Nations (UN) of being engaged on a spy mission on Sri Lanka after a satellite company which provided controversial images of the ‘No-fire’ zone has seemingly admitted it had gone beyond its intended operations on the advice of the world body.
It is what was indicated to me.. Govt was upset...and it may be true..sri_lion said:Let me refer to this reply of yours!
Is this not your opinion?
AtulaSiriwardane said:It is what was indicated to me.. Govt was upset...and it may be true..
I was not accusing they did it and whether it is right or wrong.....
That's what I meant by posting opinion..
And I was talking about that particular thread.. not all of mine.
Sometimes I post my opinion..
I can have my opinion... and you yours. I respect that.
Without an opinion i would be a dummy.
)sri_lion said:No the problem is your opinions are all too general (personally I think you are doing it purposely)
With regard to that indecent it could be many possibilities...
1. Army has shelled the NFZ by mistake
2. Army has shelled the NFZ purposely (with / without govt. permission)
3. LTTE has shelled the area to frame the Army
4. Satellite images are outdated
So when you say "Puhul Hora Karen Dane" and present the news that Govt. denies the attack, by default what does that imply? mind you the allegations were originally made by a Pro-LTTE party!
So you are willing to accept a pro-LTTE source if it bashes the govt. ?
Do you think that makes you transparent? to me it sounds like you are heavily biased too, so what's the difference between you and the others that you are trying to so called *create awareness*?

then dont harp about SL constitution being followed in EK.Wal Bada said:The reality is, that if EK does not follow SL constitution, it will be blocked in SL. And 71.3% of traffic is from SL. Without SL base, EK is dead and buried. I don't want that to happen to this wonderful site.
kosandpol said:then dont harp about SL constitution being followed in EK.
If EK gets banned in SL, then that is the core problem. SL cannot ban EK just because it criticizes GoSL. We, the people, who vote and elect a govt has every right to criticize it. Last time I checked, SL is still a democracy. Not a totalitarian govt or a monarchy.

clever post. You evaded the question.AtulaSiriwardane said:In truth
I enjoy reading your comments on news
than reading actual news.
I think
that is enough for you.
kosandpol said:clever post. You evaded the question.




