hapriyankara said:Thanks for your information machan .... you're correct ....
![]()
![]()
always

get the right situation UNP is trying to fill up their bucket some how i think that they have to do somthing with both incidents UNP isnt smart enough LOL
hapriyankara said:Thanks for your information machan .... you're correct ....
![]()
![]()

madurax86 said:always
get the right situation UNP is trying to fill up their bucket some how i think that they have to do somthing with both incidents UNP isnt smart enough LOL

madurax86 said:always
get the right situation UNP is trying to fill up their bucket some how i think that they have to do somthing with both incidents UNP isnt smart enough LOL

NiyamaSinhalaya said:MYTH NUMBER 6: UNP was behind it.
According to above mentioned point, it says how VAN got through the check points.....
If they can check every vehicle going on road no body can move here and there easily. It will be create traffic jams and unnecessary issues.
So this point is not valid bro......
I dont know others since we dont know the truth yet.....

asanka10 said:Buuaah

hapriyankara said:ya thats true ... but rae 10 n 11 n passe wahana aduine .... ekai oya kiyanne![]()
NiyamaSinhalaya said:Owu wahana adui tamai...
hebai awunat practically hema wahayakma check wena sambawitawa adui neda....
Oya balanna re 11n passe eliyata gihin oyawa check point keeyakin nawat wanawada kiyala.....
White van ekaka kina allapuwatte indan awot check point ahuwennet netuwa ati neda.....
May okkoma upakalpan.....
Balamu lankawe Police eka hondaida..wede allanna puluwan da kiyala....
Hebai katawat haniyak nokara giya nisa seka sanka UNP ekatat yanawa Sirasa ekata yanawa...Anduwatat yanawa...
May tunterawilla wisanada gattama okoma eliwei...

Wal Bada said:So why is Ravu=i Karunayake's henchman is arrested for this? Where does it fit?
who knows ???So there is a positive impact of attacking Sirasa. Nice, finally he has accepted it. On other hand if governmant is ging to risk it's popularity over such an act, it may be very necessary in their view. But what I feel is the whole point is bollocks.MYTH NUMBER 1: Governments do not take risks at the climax of popularity.
This is a baseless argument. Governments take risks everyday and do more so when they are popular. Then only they can afford to balance the negative impact with positives.p
(Like introducing Environment levies on the same day of a cricket victory) Even the most populist governments apparently take unpopular decisions. For example, the decision not to reduce the petrol prices, as directed by the Supreme Court, was certainly unpopular, but still Kurakkan regime took the risk.
Then of course, not every section of a govt is populist. There are sections that need not be, having not to face an election. Is there any guarantee that such a section not taking a risk?
At that point the buster gets busted.MYTH NUMBER 2: Govt/SLFP do not benefit from these two acts.
In short term, may be. Still think the long term impact. Sirasa TV and Sunday Leader publications were the only true independent media in Sri Lanka. Others are controlled by Govt either directly (ITN, Rupavahini) or indirectly (Divaina, Lakbima) Sirasa TV and Sunday Leader were the only media that took the risk of supporting opposition in an election. Silence them and who will benefit? Government or Opposition? Imagine the loss to opposition in a Presidential or General Election without Sirasa and a journalist like Lasantha. Isn’t SLFP the only beneficiary?
And Sirasa caught red handed moving its hi tech appliances to Ratmalana. They planned it for insuarance money. Last time also the did it.MYTH NUMBER 5: The damage at Sirasa TV was not substantial. That was how they could start all their programs the next day.
The damage was substantial. The control room has completely gone. What Sirasa does now is running the process manually. Burning somebody’s car not necessarily prevent him from going to office. He still can walk or take the bus.