F - 35 එකක් පැත්ත පලාතකවත් තියෙනවා කියල detect කරගන්නත් කලින් එ්කෙන් Su - 57 එකට හුකවල අැරල ඉවරයි.
When comparing the radar range of a Su-57 to an F-35, the Su-57 generally has a longer detection range due to its advanced radar system, the N036 Byelka, which can detect targets at a greater distance, especially against larger radar cross-section aircraft like the F-35;
The Su-57 fighter jet's radar, known as the N036 Byelka, has a detection range of up to 400 kilometers (250 miles), allowing it to detect targets at a considerable distance
The F-35's radar, the AN/APG-81, has a detection range exceeding 80 nautical miles (150 kilometers),
Notable specifications of the Su-57 include a top speed of Mach 2 (approximately 2,136 km/h), a combat range of about 1,900 kilometers, and the ability to carry a variety of weapons in its internal bays and on external hardpoints.
The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II has a maximum speed of Mach 1.6, which is (approximately 1,200 miles per hour)
හුත්තො F 35 එකේ RCS එක ගොල්ෆ් බෝලයකටත් වඩා චූටියි. කිලෝ මීටර් 400 ක් අෑත අල්ලයි පකක්. රුසියන් පොන්නයො කියවන වැල් බයිලා විශ්වාස කරන්න කලින් මොළේ පොඩ්ඩක් පාවිච්චි කරපන්. යුක්රේන කාරයොත් උඩ දාගෙන ගහපු හැටි මතකනෙ.
Su 57 එකේ මොන රේඩාර් පකකටවත් visual range එකෙන් එහාට F 35 එකක් හොයන්ඩ වෙන් නෑ. ජිල් බෝල ඩාන්ස් දදා ඉද්දි එකපාරට කොහෙ හරි පුපුරල යනවා තේරෙයි, Su 57 එක බිමට පත බෑවෙයි. වුණේ මොකක්ද කියල පස්සෙ තමයි හොයන්න වෙන්නෙ.
හැබැයි එක දෙයක් නම් හරි ඉතින්, Air show එකකට ඕක පැහැදිලි කරන්න හදන එක මෝඩ කමක්.
The Sukhoi Su-57 and the Lockheed Martin F-35 serve different roles and have different strengths. Here’s how they compare in real-world performance:
Stealth & Sensors
F-35: Prioritizes stealth and sensor fusion. It has the most advanced avionics, sensor suite, and networked warfare capabilities. Its stealth is superior due to radar-absorbent materials and a carefully designed shape.
Su-57: While stealthy, it is not as stealth-focused as the F-35. Russia has struggled with radar-absorbent materials, and its shape is less optimized for stealth. However, it compensates with agility and electronic warfare systems.
Air-to-Air Combat
F-35: Not built for traditional dogfights but has high situational awareness due to its advanced sensors and data-sharing capabilities. Can engage threats before they see it.
Su-57: Designed to be an air superiority fighter with supermaneuverability, thrust-vectoring, and high speed, making it a stronger performer in close-range dogfights.
Weapons & Strike Capabilities
F-35: More advanced precision-guided munitions, better integration with Western missile systems, and superior Beyond Visual Range (BVR) combat.
Su-57: Can carry a mix of air-to-air and air-to-ground weapons but lacks the Western technology advantage in precision-guided weaponry and networking.
Situational Awareness & Electronic Warfare
F-35: Superior data fusion, network-centric warfare, and electronic warfare capabilities make it highly effective in complex battlefields.
Su-57: Has advanced electronic warfare but is behind the F-35 in data-sharing and integration.
Production & Real-World Deployment
F-35: Mass-produced, battle-tested (used by the U.S. and allies), and has participated in real-world operations.
Su-57: Very limited production (only a handful in service), and it hasn’t seen real combat on a meaningful scale.
Conclusion
The F-35 is better in networked warfare, stealth, and precision strike roles—ideal for modern warfare.
The Su-57 is better in agility and dogfighting but lacks the F-35’s stealth, sensor fusion, and real-world combat experience.
In a real war scenario, the F-35 is likely the superior overall platform, but in a direct dogfight, the Su-57 might have an edge. However, modern air combat rarely comes down to close-range fights.
