Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Colombo
Red Hat Certified System Administrator (RHCSA) - RHEL 10
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Yesterday at 7:43 PM
NURSING , CAREGIVER , HOTEL & BEAUTY COURSES
IVA Para Medical Campus
Updated:
Thursday at 9:24 AM
Handmade Character Soft Toys Peppa Pig Family
anil1961
Updated:
Wednesday at 9:58 PM
Ad icon
Video Content Creator
pramukag
Updated:
Sunday at 6:10 AM
Ad icon
QA Engineer Intern
pramukag
Updated:
Sunday at 6:07 AM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
Entertainment
New Artist or Actor
Udari Warnakulasuuriya Hot !!!!!!!!!
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="warwickuni" data-source="post: 17247816" data-attributes="member: 101444"><p>What Udari had done cannot be recorded in CCTV . She had taken new clothes to changing room and remove tags. This is why now there is a number tag given and a person is standing outside to collect if you do not wish to buy. Earlier there was no restriction on number of items taken for fit on and one could remove the tag(that is not the price tag, but the detector tag ) and put it in hand bag(ladies are allowed their hand bags inside and they cannot be examined except by a female). She had pleaded to release and also cried(acted) and had told that it was done as her husband did not buy cloches(acting again). </p><p> So there is no need of CCTV footage to prove her guilt. CCTV cannot record everything and there are lot of people who do shoplifting without getting caught. </p><p> I have to say this. I totally condemn what Odel did by publishing her photograph after getting caught. This is wrong . The security personnel in that shop are very swollen headed and this was a very high handed act. Most of the time they assault the thief(males only). But no one has so far complained. They do not have right to do so.</p><p> As much as stealing is wrong the subsequent conduct of the security personnel are also wrong. Keep in mind this is SL and right and wrong do not have same meaning</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="warwickuni, post: 17247816, member: 101444"] What Udari had done cannot be recorded in CCTV . She had taken new clothes to changing room and remove tags. This is why now there is a number tag given and a person is standing outside to collect if you do not wish to buy. Earlier there was no restriction on number of items taken for fit on and one could remove the tag(that is not the price tag, but the detector tag ) and put it in hand bag(ladies are allowed their hand bags inside and they cannot be examined except by a female). She had pleaded to release and also cried(acted) and had told that it was done as her husband did not buy cloches(acting again). So there is no need of CCTV footage to prove her guilt. CCTV cannot record everything and there are lot of people who do shoplifting without getting caught. I have to say this. I totally condemn what Odel did by publishing her photograph after getting caught. This is wrong . The security personnel in that shop are very swollen headed and this was a very high handed act. Most of the time they assault the thief(males only). But no one has so far complained. They do not have right to do so. As much as stealing is wrong the subsequent conduct of the security personnel are also wrong. Keep in mind this is SL and right and wrong do not have same meaning [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom