I don't have "great" knowledge. I have common sense, which most people seem to lack.zeeta said:so seems that you have very good skills and standards of prgming....
So buddy try to help xAurora with your gr8 knowledge...
I don't have "great" knowledge. I have common sense, which most people seem to lack.zeeta said:so seems that you have very good skills and standards of prgming....
So buddy try to help xAurora with your gr8 knowledge...
Heard about kiss? Didn't think so.zeeta said:Well..... mmm... yeah...
Viva revolution
So is every Google productdacoolest said:still......... my vote is for the firefox........ but chrome will do something bigger in the near future!!!!!!!!!! its still in beta!
hansakach said:Here some print screns of skins that xAurora have..... some people said that the "Appearance matter"
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
IF u can't see it, then enlarge it
What?psyche said:
Damn chrome supports only XP SP2....have to wait till they put one for SP3![]()
Its working on XP SP3Dude! NOT SKINNING! LAYOUT. I was talking about layout!!!hansakach said:Here some print screns of skins that xAurora have..... some people said that the "Appearance matter"
IF u can't see it, then enlarge it
(If you want proof I can show, but is a recorded video in GIF format, and it is 2MB+ in size)Anusha said:IE is not ugly. If u call that ugly, then there is nothing to say about xAurora's interface.
Of course I don't know what's going inside a browser. I don't know about any of the browsers' internals. All that I see and worry about are,zeeta said:yeah that's true....
there is no word can explain Aurora's Awesomeness or gr8ness.....
he he welcome brother...
you are the one who said that Aurora is Ugly... saying that you have said the one that i mentioned...
We can now clearly see that you don't have a single idea about what is going on inside the xAurora...
xAurora need just a fair chance...
regards bro
Anusha said:Dude! NOT SKINNING! LAYOUT. I was talking about layout!!!
Also the memory consumption it shows on Task Manager is wrong(If you want proof I can show, but is a recorded video in GIF format, and it is 2MB+ in size)
Anusha said:Of course I don't know what's going inside a browser. I don't know about any of the browsers' internals. All that I see and worry about are,
1. How easy to use a browser
2. How fast it is
3. How feature rich it is AT THE SAME TIME how simple it is
4. How much compatible it is with standards and sites
5. How safe it is
1st and 3rd points do not get enough marks from me to be called it's good enough. It has good enough speed. Some sites load fast, some don't. Every browser is like that. I don't know how much compatible it is with sites, or how safe it is. I really don't know. And I refuse to use something that is NOT "known well" for safety. It might have safety features, but it's not proven anything YET.
Usability gets like 10/100 when I would give 95/100 to Firefox.