yes i hve read about it in chip magazine.Sasika@Elakiri said:Dont its a trash
If you really wanna go for linux try Susse
i like to use any version of linux.
but the problem is i dont know to install it with windows

yes i hve read about it in chip magazine.Sasika@Elakiri said:Dont its a trash
If you really wanna go for linux try Susse

ashenrandika said:yes i hve read about it in chip magazine.
i like to use any version of linux.
but the problem is i dont know to install it with windows![]()
![]()
Anusha said:How so? You can have Photoshop on both. OSX might be a little faster, but nothing extravagant.

yes bro.. can you help me???Sasika@Elakiri said:Do you wanna know hoe to Dual boot (2 os choice)

ashenrandika said:yes i hve read about it in chip magazine.
i like to use any version of linux.
but the problem is i dont know to install it with windows![]()
![]()
I don't know because I don't use it.coolioWiZ said:Why am I feeling latest photoshop versions are bloatware. I have both photoshop CS2 and photoshop 7.0 in my PC.![]()

(64bit goodness
)Anusha said:I don't know because I don't use it.
I don't like image editing, but if I want to do small such tasks, I use paint .net(64bit goodness
)

ashenrandika said:i have used knpoixx and ubuntu live cds.
so i like to install ubuntu. why dont u like ubuntu??
of ubuntu.ashenrandika said:yes bro.. can you help me???![]()
thanks bro...coolioWiZ said:Read this too, before starting: (contains screenshots of the process)
http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/installing
Good Luck

I don't care for the company...If Adobe had a better product, which is less complex for general use and of course with 64bit support, I would have used it. As per user claims, Paint .Net's filtering performance superior to Photoshop because of 64bit-ness. Stupid Adobe! This is one area they could have excelled with 64bit Photoshop...coolioWiZ said:lol you are all microsoft![]()
Anusha said:I don't care for the company...If Adobe had a better product, which is less complex for general use and of course with 64bit support, I would have used it. As per user claims, Paint .Net's filtering performance superior to Photoshop because of 64bit-ness. Stupid Adobe! This is one area they could have excelled with 64bit Photoshop...![]()
And Paint .Net is not a Microsoft product. It is only developed by a Microsoft personnel, independently and as a hobby. Microsoft doesn't support the project.

Vista's only got paintcoolioWiZ said:I do a bit of graphics editing. Not seriously, but as a hobby. When I was new to computers, I installed various graphics software and also photoshop. I hated photoshop due to it's complexity and got hooked up with fireworks (by Macromedia, but now Adobe), later around I scratched with photoshop again and now I'm hooked permanently. I feel like I can't get used to other graphics programs (GIMP even). I really like the powerful layer editing features in photoshop, there is still no match to it windows or non windows, or 32bit or 64bit.
I knew about paint.net, but didn't have the .net platform to get it working. I was bored to installed .net platform, so as a result paint.net never came to my computer. It's a good thing if microsoft includes paint.net default with their OS. It has layer support and some features eventhrough its miles behind photoshop.
I think maybe adobe is finding it difficult to go optimizing their software for 64bit. If you are going to release a 64bit version people expect it to be optimized and perform better than a 32bit version. Since adobe can't do that, they keep quite to save their name.
Does vista have any graphics editor with layers and channels support or is it still good ol paint

) There is a forum with lots of tutorials for it.