Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="alagakkonara" data-source="post: 5293849" data-attributes="member: 128791">No wrong in what you did, I only had a problem with one thing you said which I will explain. But maybe you did not want to express it like that. If so It's my mistake. But what your words is what I have for I do not know what you thought.  you said,. So you said that this is where(The article) Buddhism stands on eating meat. Am I wrong????? You posted this to share where Buddhism stands on eating meat. Right??? You simply accepted the facts on the article(or maybe you didnt, but seemed like that), and you immediately went to the conclusion, ok this is where buddhism stands on eating meat. That's what suggests from your comment. Maybe you intended something else. But thats the meaning of words. My question was how can you say that where Buddhisms stands on eating meat is this(what article says)? You get my point now? Dont think there's anything difficult to get anyway..You simply pointed out it like a fact, 'this is where buddhism stands', although you clearly know that each individual has to understand himself. If you dont get my point just drop it. I apologize, rest of my comment was not fired at you....</blockquote>

Top Bottom