Which CPU do you own?

pasanlaksiri

Member
Aug 22, 2006
4,179
0
0
Thalawathugoda
Anusha said:
There could be a reason. Some chipsets will go back to a slower RAM speed when more RAM is installed. It's a chipset incapability. You might be able to change the RAM speeds manually in the BIOS if it lets you do it and if this is the reason why it's running slow.

Thank u brother 4 info
 

hydride

Junior member
  • Nov 13, 2006
    444
    1
    18
    DJ.Parker said:
    exams mucho ;)




    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



    slbp2ww4.gif

    grtgfzb6.gif

    elakirikw7.gif

    userbar243556aw1.gif

    Untitled-1.jpg
     

    dpg

    Active member
  • Oct 12, 2006
    10,442
    6
    38
    $ȑї ḶÅῇḵấ
    Anusha said:
    There could be a reason. Some chipsets will go back to a slower RAM speed when more RAM is installed. It's a chipset incapability. You might be able to change the RAM speeds manually in the BIOS if it lets you do it and if this is the reason why it's running slow.

    im not so sure abt the chipset thing, but if u mix two rams with different frequencies or timings the BIOS will settle for the slowest setting.... :yes: :yes: ;)
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    dpg said:
    im not so sure abt the chipset thing, but if u mix two rams with different frequencies or timings the BIOS will settle for the slowest setting.... :yes: :yes: ;)

    This is correct too. But if you are lucky, you will be able to overclock the slower RAM.

    Here are two example from my previous PC (motherboard).
    1. When I have all 4 DDR slots full, all RAM would workat DDR266 even when all are DDR400
    2. If I have up to 3 slots full, I will be limited by the slowest RAM I have. In my case, it was a 256MB DDR333 with two 512MB DDR400. All will run at DDR333.
    3. But my DDR333 could work at DDR400 speeds with the same latencies as the DDR400. So when I set the speeds and latencies manually (you have to experiment with this and stress test for few hours using Memtest86+), I could ran all of them DDR400 speeds.
    4. But when I installed the other 256MB which was a DDR266, but this also could run at DDR400 speed, I couldn't overclock it even to 270MHz.

    It could be any of these two reasons.
     

    dpg

    Active member
  • Oct 12, 2006
    10,442
    6
    38
    $ȑї ḶÅῇḵấ
    Anusha said:
    This is correct too. But if you are lucky, you will be able to overclock the slower RAM.

    Here are two example from my previous PC (motherboard).
    1. When I have all 4 DDR slots full, all RAM would workat DDR266 even when all are DDR400
    2. If I have up to 3 slots full, I will be limited by the slowest RAM I have. In my case, it was a 256MB DDR333 with two 512MB DDR400. All will run at DDR333.
    3. But my DDR333 could work at DDR400 speeds with the same latencies as the DDR400. So when I set the speeds and latencies manually (you have to experiment with this and stress test for few hours using Memtest86+), I could ran all of them DDR400 speeds.
    4. But when I installed the other 256MB which was a DDR266, but this also could run at DDR400 speed, I couldn't overclock it even to 270MHz.

    It could be any of these two reasons.

    OCing always helps... :D

    BTW What was ur cpu back then??
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    AthlonXP 2600+ Thoroughbred "B" core with 256kB L2
    It was factory unlocked. So I could change the multiplier. Original specs were 133x16 = 2133MHz and I overclocked it to 196x11=2156MHz. That's almost a 50% increase in FSB.
     

    zCexVe

    Active member
  • Sep 12, 2006
    8,550
    22
    38
    Where I'm now
    Model:AMD Athlon 64 3200+ socket 939 Venice 1.4V 2000MHz
    Stock Speed:2000MHz
    Current Speed:2500MHz(But in xtreme it goes to the max available in da world,whopping 2700MHz!!)
    Time of purchase:At about 11.30 am lolzz 02/08/2006
    Price:18000 LKR
    Why: Huge AMD fanboy,The only CPU available with the highest clocks.
     

    KishanW

    Member
    Apr 12, 2007
    9,629
    24
    0
    USA
    500MHZ intel Celeron with 64Mb SD ram(actually 63Mb,bcose i hv to give 1Mb to my on board VGA).66MHz bus speed(i think),12GB hard drive running win 98
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    zCexVe said:
    Model:AMD Athlon 64 3200+ socket 939 Venice 1.4V 2000MHz
    Stock Speed:2000MHz
    Current Speed:2500MHz(But in xtreme it goes to the max available in da world,whopping 2700MHz!!)
    Time of purchase:At about 11.30 am lolzz 02/08/2006
    Price:18000 LKR
    Why: Huge AMD fanboy,The only CPU available with the highest clocks.
    You know, the maximum clock speed attained by a A64 3200 Venice is over 1GHz than ur max clocks.

    http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=62394
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    nabil said:
    Model:intel PIV
    Stock Speed:2.4Ghz
    Current Speed:2.4Ghz
    Time of purchase:2 years ago
    Price:30k
    Why:Badly needed a computer 4 my projects.
    ;)
    We need the price of the processor only. Rs.30000 is for the full system ne?
     

    blood_brotha

    Member
    Sep 25, 2006
    6,308
    47
    0
    Nuuk, Greenland
    Anusha said:
    Are you kidding me? :confused: I bought my last PC with a AthonXP 2600+ in 2003 May!!! At that time, they had the 2.4GHz and 2.53GHz Intel CPUs and 2600+ was the fastest at Rs.19,000.

    barton??? palomino??? thorton??? throghbred??
     
    Last edited:

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    blood_brotha said:
    upto 2250 Mhz. clocks better than the barton i suppose
    Well, not really. I couldn't get mine to 2.2GHz :(
    2.2GHz wasn't prime stable. I only could increase the FSB keeping the clock speed at stock (=2.133; 133*16)(or slightly above stock). Luckily it was unlocked. So I could lower the multi to 11. 10 and 10.5 didn't allow it to P.O.S.T. :(