Yeah, i guess a variant of zip (nt sure), files shud be compressed thru a command line app named UHARC.exe, try...Anusha said:I have not. It's a archival format, right?
That's why I said to vote for the most frequently used one.shanX said:K , so stats are not accurate![]()
This is the archiver which could compress Office 2007 Beta DVD to 4-5MBshanX said:KGB?? wts tht?
Ginger beer da??![]()
![]()
![]()

Well, 7-Zip should be better. I don't like the GUI much though. Wished WinRAR could give 7-Zip's performanceshanX said:Yeah, i guess a variant of zip (nt sure), files shud be compressed thru a command line app named UHARC.exe, try...

Link?Anusha said:This is the archiver which could compress Office 2007 Beta DVD to 4-5MB![]()

Thn topic shud be, Which file archiver are u using most frequently?Anusha said:That's why I said to vote for the most frequently used one.

Can't change it nowshanX said:Thn topic shud be, Which file archiver are u using most frequently?![]()

I hav installd 7-zip, but nt using much, due to GUI, not listed on context menu ...etc, gave upAnusha said:Well, 7-Zip should be better. I don't like the GUI much though. Wished WinRAR could give 7-Zip's performance![]()


What do you mean by not listed on context menu?shanX said:I hav installd 7-zip, but nt using much, due to GUI, not listed on context menu ...etc, gave up
And still i hav a lot free space![]()
Right-click menu.Anusha said:What do you mean by not listed on context menu?

Portability doesn't concern me. Why I use 7-zip is because of one reason. One CRITICAL reason. It's 64bit!!! It's still faster in 32bit than WinRAR. It's even faster in 64bit.shanX said:Right-click menu.
Well, am nt sure whether i hav disabled it on 7-zip's options
And anthr reason for nt using 7-zip is portability
Anusha said:Portability doesn't concern me. Why I use 7-zip is because of one reason. One CRITICAL reason. It's 64bit!!! It's still faster in 32bit than WinRAR. It's even faster in 64bit.
Thn no need to argue further