Who is a Muslim?

[Y2K]

According to the common understanding prevalent around the world, a Muslim is one who believes in Allah and in Muhammad as his messenger.

This understanding is totally ERRONEOUS since it is based neither on the Arabic language nor on facts.

This deliberate falsification of history and theology, was propagated by the recently converted pagan Arabs during and after their worldwide conquests. From then on, they imposed their will upon the subject peoples and unjustifiably arrogated to themselves alone and later on, to other none Arabian converts- the term MUSLIMS.

It is important that the reader be made aware of the following:


Islam/Muslim-

It is derived from the Arabic verb Aslama meaning to Submit to (the will of the one and only Allah). It is the religion PAR EXCELLENCE of SUBMISSION and a follower of Islam is called a Muslim.


Contrary to all the deliberate and mendacious claims by the current followers of Muhammad, ISLAM means SUBMISSION only, and has nothing to do with PEACE which is SALAM.

 

[M.RIZ]

According to the common understanding prevalent around the world, a Muslim is one who believes in Allah and in Muhammad as his messenger.

This understanding is totally ERRONEOUS since it is based neither on the Arabic language nor on facts.

This deliberate falsification of history and theology, was propagated by the recently converted pagan Arabs during and after their worldwide conquests. From then on, they imposed their will upon the subject peoples and unjustifiably arrogated to themselves alone and later on, to other none Arabian converts- the term MUSLIMS.

It is important that the reader be made aware of the following:


Islam/Muslim-

It is derived from the Arabic verb Aslama meaning to Submit to (the will of the one and only Allah). It is the religion PAR EXCELLENCE of SUBMISSION and a follower of Islam is called a Muslim.


Contrary to all the deliberate and mendacious claims by the current followers of Muhammad, ISLAM means SUBMISSION only, and has nothing to do with PEACE which is SALAM.

Do you know both islam and salam(peace)derived from root word " S L M "

 

[Y2K]

Do you know both islam and salam(peace)derived from root word " S L M "

Piss ?

 

[ibnanv]

Vatican celebrates 30th AIDS anniversary with more bigotry

Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Priests in the United States, 1950-2010″


You might remember Pope Benedict’s statements last December blaming the past child rape on the 70′s culture, with the “tu quoque” argument that the “context of the times” somehow justified it because, to paraphrase, “everyone was doing it.” Well now the Church has a genuine study to back them up.
Two weeks ago the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York released a report “The Causes and Context of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Priests in the United States, 1950-2010″ that supported the Pope’s statement. It concluded that the majority of the child rapes occurred during the 60′s and 70′s, which was “consistent with the rise in other types of “deviant” behavior, such as drug use and crime” and that “perceptions of “normal” sexual behavior are not stable over time, nor are laws governing the sexual behavior that is considered wrong.” The study seems to suggest that child rape was somehow normal during the hippie revolution and is no longer considered acceptable these days, which is why reports are now coming in decades after the crimes.
The study goes on to say that most “pedo-priests” aren’t actually pedophiles because “pedophilia is defined as the sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Yet, the data on priests show that 22 percent of victims were age ten and under, while the majority of victims were pubescent or postpubescent.”
Well then, they’re not all pedophiles after all, so I guess that makes it okay.
You’d think a five-year study into child-raping priests by a College of Criminal Justice would sound more like it was on the side of actual justice than trying to make excuses for the Catholic Church, until you count the number of times the word “Catholic” appears in the donors list. This study, commissioned by the The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, is nothing more than another example of the old Catholic doctrine “Downplay the sin, protect the sinner, screw the victim.”

The study can be downloaded from here. A good review about how this report is worthless and dangerous can be found here.
Related Posts:

• African Priests Rape Nuns to Avoid AIDS
• The Vatican, a Rogue Pseudo-State, Part 2
• “Bishops agree sex abuse rules”
• Children’s Choice
• On the Church's NFP-only stance: The case of Texas

http://filipinofreethinkers.org/201...ed-in-the-70s-and-they-werent-all-pedophiles/

 

[Y2K]

Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Priests in the United States, 1950-2010″


You might remember Pope Benedict’s statements last December blaming the past child rape on the 70′s culture, with the “tu quoque” argument that the “context of the times” somehow justified it because, to paraphrase, “everyone was doing it.” Well now the Church has a genuine study to back them up.
Two weeks ago the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York released a report “The Causes and Context of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Priests in the United States, 1950-2010″ that supported the Pope’s statement. It concluded that the majority of the child rapes occurred during the 60′s and 70′s, which was “consistent with the rise in other types of “deviant” behavior, such as drug use and crime” and that “perceptions of “normal” sexual behavior are not stable over time, nor are laws governing the sexual behavior that is considered wrong.” The study seems to suggest that child rape was somehow normal during the hippie revolution and is no longer considered acceptable these days, which is why reports are now coming in decades after the crimes.
The study goes on to say that most “pedo-priests” aren’t actually pedophiles because “pedophilia is defined as the sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Yet, the data on priests show that 22 percent of victims were age ten and under, while the majority of victims were pubescent or postpubescent.”
Well then, they’re not all pedophiles after all, so I guess that makes it okay.
You’d think a five-year study into child-raping priests by a College of Criminal Justice would sound more like it was on the side of actual justice than trying to make excuses for the Catholic Church, until you count the number of times the word “Catholic” appears in the donors list. This study, commissioned by the The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, is nothing more than another example of the old Catholic doctrine “Downplay the sin, protect the sinner, screw the victim.”

The study can be downloaded from here. A good review about how this report is worthless and dangerous can be found here.
Related Posts:

• African Priests Rape Nuns to Avoid AIDS
• The Vatican, a Rogue Pseudo-State, Part 2
• “Bishops agree sex abuse rules”
• Children’s Choice
• On the Church's NFP-only stance: The case of Texas

http://filipinofreethinkers.org/201...ed-in-the-70s-and-they-werent-all-pedophiles/

Piss be upon you !!!