Ok... This is not for everybody. I know that some don't want to think... Some can't think clearly for they are so partial.I invite who are not partial and are interested in thinking.
Would you compare these two situations and evaluate whose deaths are acceptable in principle. As an example A soldier and a terrorist are engaged in war, mentally and physically. That is acceptable in principle.
Two similar situations in war.
1] Forces attack North -Four types of people get killed in the attack.
1A- A Terrorist
1B- An indirect active supporter of war, who spends his time and money for protests etc.
1C- A person who approves war, enjoys victories but only thinks and talks in support..
1D- A person who is against war.
1E- A person who is indifferent.
2] Terrorists attack South -Four types of people get killed in the attack.
2A- A Soldier
2B- An indirect active supporter of war, who spends his time and money for protests etc.
2C- A person who approves war, enjoys victories but only thinks and talks in support..
2D- A person who is against war.
2E- A person who is indifferent.
You may make your choice and explain your reasons,
please vote the poll too.
Let's see whether you are sure of your opinion.
If you have to think twice before you reply or vote, You have not thought clearly up to now.
Hope to read some fine replies...

