Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Pure VPN - Up to 27 Months
vgp
Updated:
Friday at 8:10 AM
එක පැකේජ් එකයි මාසෙටම Unlimited Internet. තාමත් DATA CARD දාන්න සල්ලි වියදම් කරනවද? අඩුම මිලට අපෙන්.
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Jun 2, 2026
Ad icon
ඉන්ටර්නෙට් එකෙන් හරියටම සල්ලි හොයන්න සහ Success වෙන්න කැමතිද? 🚀 (E-Money & Success Stories)
siri sumana
Updated:
May 30, 2026
Gemini AI PRO 18 months Offer
Hawaka
Updated:
May 27, 2026
Ad icon
koko account
DasunEranga
Updated:
May 27, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Whose death is acceptable.?
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AtulaSiriwardane" data-source="post: 3910749" data-attributes="member: 120286"><p><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/wink.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" />Ok... This is not for everybody. I know that some don't want to think... Some can't think clearly for they are so partial.</p><p>I invite who are not partial and are interested in thinking.</p><p>Would you compare these two situations and evaluate whose deaths are acceptable in principle. As an example A soldier and a terrorist are engaged in war, mentally and physically. That is acceptable in principle.</p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><u><strong>Two similar situations in war. </strong></u></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">1]</span> Forces attack North </strong>-Four types of people get killed in the attack.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Red"><strong>1A</strong></span>- A Terrorist </p><p><span style="color: Red"><strong>1B</strong></span>- An indirect active supporter of war, who spends his time and money for protests etc.</p><p><span style="color: Red"><strong>1C</strong></span>- A person who approves war, enjoys victories but only thinks and talks in support..</p><p><span style="color: Red"><strong>1D</strong></span>- A person who is against war.</p><p><span style="color: Red"><strong>1E</strong></span>- A person who is indifferent.</p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">2]</span> </strong><strong>Terrorists </strong><strong>attack </strong><strong>South </strong>-Four types of people get killed in the attack.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Red"><strong>2A</strong></span>- A Soldier</p><p><span style="color: Red"><strong>2B</strong></span>- An indirect active supporter of war, who spends his time and money for protests etc.</p><p><span style="color: Red"><strong>2C</strong></span>- A person who approves war, enjoys victories but only thinks and talks in support..</p><p><span style="color: Red"><strong>2D</strong></span>- A person who is against war.</p><p><span style="color: Red"><strong>2E</strong></span>- A person who is indifferent.</p><p></p><p>You may make your choice and explain your reasons, </p><p>please vote the poll too.</p><p>Let's see whether you are sure of your opinion.</p><p>If you have to think twice before you reply or vote, You have not thought clearly up to now. </p><p>Hope to read some fine replies...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AtulaSiriwardane, post: 3910749, member: 120286"] ;)Ok... This is not for everybody. I know that some don't want to think... Some can't think clearly for they are so partial. I invite who are not partial and are interested in thinking. Would you compare these two situations and evaluate whose deaths are acceptable in principle. As an example A soldier and a terrorist are engaged in war, mentally and physically. That is acceptable in principle. [SIZE=3][U][B]Two similar situations in war. [/B][/U][/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE][B][SIZE=3]1][/SIZE] Forces attack North [/B]-Four types of people get killed in the attack. [COLOR=Red][B]1A[/B][/COLOR]- A Terrorist [COLOR=Red][B]1B[/B][/COLOR]- An indirect active supporter of war, who spends his time and money for protests etc. [COLOR=Red][B]1C[/B][/COLOR]- A person who approves war, enjoys victories but only thinks and talks in support.. [COLOR=Red][B]1D[/B][/COLOR]- A person who is against war. [COLOR=Red][B]1E[/B][/COLOR]- A person who is indifferent. [B][SIZE=3]2][/SIZE] [/B][B]Terrorists [/B][B]attack [/B][B]South [/B]-Four types of people get killed in the attack. [COLOR=Red][B]2A[/B][/COLOR]- A Soldier [COLOR=Red][B]2B[/B][/COLOR]- An indirect active supporter of war, who spends his time and money for protests etc. [COLOR=Red][B]2C[/B][/COLOR]- A person who approves war, enjoys victories but only thinks and talks in support.. [COLOR=Red][B]2D[/B][/COLOR]- A person who is against war. [COLOR=Red][B]2E[/B][/COLOR]- A person who is indifferent. You may make your choice and explain your reasons, please vote the poll too. Let's see whether you are sure of your opinion. If you have to think twice before you reply or vote, You have not thought clearly up to now. Hope to read some fine replies... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom
Pure VPN - Up to 27 Months
Gemini AI PRO 18 months Offer
