Latest ads
-
Video Content Creator
- pramukag
- Updated:
-
QA Engineer Intern
- pramukag
- Updated:
-
Sell your Land, House on idamata.lk for FREE
- sajith.xp.pk
- Updated:
-
Handmade Character Soft Toys- anil1961
- Updated:
-
Bodim.lk out now !- Manoj Suranga Bandara
- Updated:
Bus eke sex karala maattu
- Thread starter SLBlackKnight
- Start date
tell that in sinhala to mal baba
Type in sinhala machan
Hi
when where how will pen bring paper write when will why how who can ? give me everything
restarted baba
Elakiri.com
I dislike the so called virtue and convention. All that does is to limit human freedom. And it is a reflection of the fact that we humans try to conform others to our own beliefs, by force if necessary.
But the law is something else. While they are admittedly unfair in certain circumstances, the laws are there to prevent much greater harm. For example, we could do away with this age of consent thing. But that would be great chance for some pedophile. He could rape a child and say s/he consented.
So at the end of the day, my opinion is that humans should be able to do whatever they want, as long as it is done with their consent and free will, and if they are above the legal age.
Not only the physically strong are fit to survive. There are other important characteristics too. But in the natural selection system, only the physically strong will thrive. While that works for the jungle, it doesn't do in this world we have now. (Physically strong people may have no brains, and weak people may still be great inventors etc.. Human society depends in human intelligence and invention.)
Also, if we went by the law of the jungle, any idiotic male will be able to control me and own me like in the dark ages, just by physical strength. So I have a vested interest in preventing that.
owned!
Your spelling is a bit off. It should be retarded not restarted
saw the frekn mistake but was bored to edit it
who cares man im addressing baba ps - auto correction suck in sometimes
I dislike the so called virtue and convention. All that does is to limit human freedom. And it is a reflection of the fact that we humans try to conform others to our own beliefs, by force if necessary.
But the law is something else. While they are admittedly unfair in certain circumstances, the laws are there to prevent much greater harm. For example, we could do away with this age of consent thing. But that would be great chance for some pedophile. He could rape a child and say s/he consented.
So at the end of the day, my opinion is that humans should be able to do whatever they want, as long as it is done with their consent and free will, and if they are above the legal age.
Not only the physically strong are fit to survive. There are other important characteristics too. But in the natural selection system, only the physically strong will thrive. While that works for the jungle, it doesn't do in this world we have now. (Physically strong people may have no brains, and weak people may still be great inventors etc.. Human society depends in human intelligence and invention.)
Also, if we went by the law of the jungle, any idiotic male will be able to control me and own me like in the dark ages, just by physical strength. So I have a vested interest in preventing that.
oya koheda?
saw the frekn mistake but was bored to edit it
ps - auto correction suck in sometimes
aho baba
oya koheda?
If you are asking where I live, that is hardly relevant to this conversation.
i dnt have A4 papaers and pens
why you roll them and put inside
i guess pen is too small for you, i suggest a mega bottleSimilar threads
