ඔසීවල ඔටුවො 10,000කට වෙඩි!

Emios

Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    75,557
    67,903
    113
    Nothing else to do.no water.human species should survive.not a time to bring animal lovers.
     

    kinkon

    Well-known member
  • Aug 5, 2007
    115,976
    2
    116,106
    113
    Kandy ♕ පතිරූප දේස වාසෝ
    Australian feral camels are feral populations consisting of two species of camel: mostly dromedaries (Camelus dromedarius) but also some Bactrian camels (Camelus bactrianus). Imported into Australia from British India and Afghanistan during the 19th century for transport and construction during the colonisation of the central and western parts of Australia, many were released into the wild after motorised transport replaced the use of camels in the early 20th century, resulting in a fast-growing feral population.
     

    KasunKDP

    Well-known member
  • Oct 29, 2013
    35,872
    1,653
    113
    hell
    nope not the fittest. if we want a world where survival of the fittest is practiced in its truest sense we all should support isis and other terrorist organizations.

    no, doing that would significantly reduce our individual chances of surviving
     

    Pessimist

    Well-known member
  • Mar 6, 2018
    20,665
    1,562
    113
    🌎
    Nothing else to do.no water.human species should survive.not a time to bring animal lovers.

    and what about Nestle ? y is okay when a big corporation exploit water for profit while animals drinking the same water for survival is wrong ?
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    75,557
    67,903
    113
    and what about Nestle ? y is okay when a big corporation exploit water for profit while animals drinking the same water for survival is wrong ?

    But now water is no more.It was ok exploitation and animal’s drinking.Now there is no more water animals should go first.fair deal
     

    Pessimist

    Well-known member
  • Mar 6, 2018
    20,665
    1,562
    113
    🌎
    no, doing that would significantly reduce our individual chances of surviving

    same can be said regarding this. killing animals like maniacs would also reduce our chance of survival. look what climate change is doing. we are reducing our chances. evolutionary theory is not meant to be used as a foundation for moral values :no:
     

    kinkon

    Well-known member
  • Aug 5, 2007
    115,976
    2
    116,106
    113
    Kandy ♕ පතිරූප දේස වාසෝ
    Australia-fires-animals-8.jpg
     

    KasunKDP

    Well-known member
  • Oct 29, 2013
    35,872
    1,653
    113
    hell
    same can be said regarding this. killing animals like maniacs would also reduce our chance of survival. look what climate change is doing. we are reducing our chances. evolutionary theory is not meant to be used as a foundation for moral values :no:

    that's indirect. before thinking about indirect effects they have to consider about people who are affected directly. and also this event alone would have miniscule effects to climate on the global scale..
     

    Pessimist

    Well-known member
  • Mar 6, 2018
    20,665
    1,562
    113
    🌎
    But now water is no more.It was ok exploitation and animal’s drinking.Now there is no more water animals should go first.fair deal

    not fair :no:
    a truly intelligent species would decide to go first leaving resources for the animals.

    that's indirect. before thinking about indirect effects they have to consider about people who are affected directly. and also this event alone would have miniscule effects to climate on the global scale..

    what use of money if they wont spend it on distributing water for people without killing animals in a situation like this. they should have given water to animals as well. look what material growth has done to human kind. im sure their gdp will rise after the killings has started