Kalegana

Well-known member
  • Sep 23, 2007
    31,456
    67,015
    113
    Kuwait-Galle
    āļ´āˇ”āļ¯āˇ”āļ¸āļē⎒ āļąāˇš.. āļœāļĢāļąāˇ”āļ­āˇŠ āļ…āļŠāˇ” āļšāļģāļąāˇ€āˇ āļąāļ¸āˇŠ āˇ„āˇœāļ¯āļē⎒ āļ‰āļ­āˇ’āļąāˇŠ..
     

    MilkywayDoughnutsSeaMen

    Active member
  • Oct 17, 2025
    276
    213
    43
    ⎄āļē⎒āļēāˇ Starlink āļ”āļēāˇ āļšāļŊ ⎄āļ¯āˇ’āļēāļšāˇŠ :rofl: SLT āļ‘āļšāˇš āļ‹āļąāˇŠ āļŊāļ‚āļšāˇāˇ€āˇš āļ‹āļąāˇŠāļ§ āˇ„āˇ’āļœāļąāˇŠāļąāˇ ⎀āļœāˇš āļŊāˇœāˇ€ āļŊāˇœāˇ€āˇ āļ‰āļąāˇŠāļą āˇ„āļ¯āļ´āˇ” long term system āļ‘āļš āļšāˇāļĢ⎔⎀ āļ¯āˇ’āļœāˇš āļēāˇāˇ€āˇŠāˇ€āļąāˇš
    The true issue is always forgotten. The fact that India and Sri Lanka share an internet backbone is the true issue. Sri Lanka literally receives one internet backbone from India. However, the cost of our fibre internet is the same as that of satellite-based internet. There is no logic to this. because fiber-based internet connections are 100 times less expensive in India than satellite-based ones. Actually, SLT and Dialog, our two fibre ISPs, were able to make significant profits as a result of Starlink. However, people continue to believe that Starlink helped them. In actuality, the opposite was true.

    āļ…āļ´āˇ’āļąāļąāˇŠ cmb district āļļāļąāˇŠ. āļ’āļ­āˇŠ starlink āļ…āļģāļœāˇ™āļą āļ‰āļąāˇŠāļąāˇš. price ⎄āļģ⎒āļēāļ§āļ¸ āˇ„āļģ⎒. Upload 50mbps, āˇ€āˇāˇƒāˇŠāˇƒāļ§ slow ⎀⎙āļąāˇŠāļą dialog tv ⎀āļ­āˇŠ mobile signal ⎀āļ­āˇŠ āļąāˇ™āˇ€āˇš, ping ⎀⎐āļŠāˇ’āļ¯ āļąāˇāļ¯āˇŠāļ¯ āļļāļŊāļąāˇŠāļą game āļœāˇ„āļąāˇŠāļąāˇš āļąāˇ‘. Truly unlimited :rofl: āļšāˇ€āˇ”āļ¯ āļ”āļēāˇāļ§ āļ¸āˇ™āˇ€āˇŠāˇ€āˇ āļšāˇ’āˇ€āˇŠāˇ€āˇš? chanux bro āļ¯ āļąāˇāļ­āˇŠāļ­āļąāˇŠ SLT āļ‘āļšāˇ™āļąāˇŠāļ¯ :lol:

    View attachment 258915
    The true issue is always forgotten. The fact that India and Sri Lanka share an internet backbone is the true issue. Sri Lanka literally receives one internet backbone from India. However, the cost of our fibre internet is the same as that of satellite-based internet. There is no logic to this. because fiber-based internet connections are 100 times less expensive in India than satellite-based ones. Actually, SLT and Dialog, our two fibre ISPs, were able to make significant profits as a result of Starlink. However, people continue to believe that Starlink helped them. In actuality, the opposite was true.
    ------ Post added on Nov 17, 2025 at 4:35 PM
     

    weere_singhe

    Well-known member
  • Dec 26, 2023
    986
    1,338
    93
    1Gbps āļšāļģāļŊāˇ āļąāˇ‘ āļēāļšāˇ”āļąāˇš..
    āļ­āˇ€āļ¸ 300/150 āļ­āˇ’āļē⎙āļąāˇŠāļąāˇš,
    ⎃āļē⎒āļ§āˇŠ āļ‘āļšāˇš āˇ€āˇ’āˇƒāˇŠāļ­āļģ ⎄āļģ⎒āļēāļ§ āļļāļŊāļ´āļŊ⎊āļŊāˇ
     
    • Like
    Reactions: AKI-SL and uajanath

    Susa911

    Well-known member
  • Jul 16, 2022
    291
    422
    63
    1763377918201.png



    āļ¯āˇ“āļŊāˇ āļ­āļ¸āˇ :love2:
     
    • Like
    Reactions: uajanath

    Sonique

    Well-known member
  • Oct 22, 2007
    25,165
    11,184
    113
    Forest
    The true issue is always forgotten. The fact that India and Sri Lanka share an internet backbone is the true issue. Sri Lanka literally receives one internet backbone from India. However, the cost of our fibre internet is the same as that of satellite-based internet. There is no logic to this. because fiber-based internet connections are 100 times less expensive in India than satellite-based ones. Actually, SLT and Dialog, our two fibre ISPs, were able to make significant profits as a result of Starlink. However, people continue to believe that Starlink helped them. In actuality, the opposite was true.
    How was it the opposite when I cancelled my long term running 8mbps 4G subscription after I got Starlink? Same price but 25x speed. Lot of people I know switched to Starlink with me cancelling Dialog and SLT subscriptions. Because we did that SLT had no option except updating their QoS. We won.
     

    MilkywayDoughnutsSeaMen

    Active member
  • Oct 17, 2025
    276
    213
    43
    How was it the opposite when I cancelled my long term running 8mbps 4G subscription after I got Starlink? Same price but 25x speed. Lot of people I know switched to Starlink with me cancelling Dialog and SLT subscriptions. Because we did that SLT had no option except updating their QoS. We won.
    Those Starlink promoters don't even mention the cost ratio between fibre and Starlink in India and Sri Lanka, countries that use the same internet backbone. Just search it yourself and see. In India Fiber is 100 times cheaper. In Sri Lanka it is the same cost between the two. These two countries uses the same internet backbone and they are nearby. So Fiber to Satelit cost ratio should be the same ratio. Not 1 to 100 and 1 to 1.
     
  • Dec 10, 2011
    11,207
    24,544
    113
    Ookla 800-900mbps

    Habai real donwload ekakadi 30-37MB

    Habai mun aththatama 1gbps kara nam hena ad ekak danwa tv eke,

    Hamadama kre oun podi deyak deela hena ad ekak damma tv eke

    Starlink ad na mkuth na 300-400mbps truly unlimited
    speedtest result nam kohomath unge manipulated neh. samaharawita real 1gbps ganna area eke msan support karanna oneda danne na
     
    • Like
    Reactions: msan

    msan

    Well-known member
  • Oct 17, 2017
    248
    251
    63
    The fact that India and Sri Lanka share an internet backbone is the true issue. Sri Lanka literally receives one internet backbone from India.
    this not true. Most of the traffic to India went throgh Singapore till recently. This is the kind of BS ChatGPT spews out.

    Dialog now has a cable connecting to India.