Know Islam one question at a time

Jan 24, 2009
3,532
130
0
අනිත් උන්ට පාඩම් කරන්න උපදෙස් දෙන ජාතියේ අයගෙන් කීදෙනෙක් ලංකාවේ උසස් අධ්‍යාපනය හදාරන්න සුදුසුකම් ලබනවද කියලා දන්නවද? :P
 
Jan 24, 2009
3,532
130
0
මට හිතෙන විදියට ඒ අයට විභාග පාස් වෙන්න බැරි, විභාගවල කොපි පේස්ට් කරන්න බැරි නිසා වෙන්න ඕන:baffled::baffled:
 

dilankandy

Member
Oct 11, 2006
1,137
78
0
මට හිතෙන විදියට ඒ අයට විභාග පාස් වෙන්න බැරි, විභාගවල කොපි පේස්ට් කරන්න බැරි නිසා වෙන්න ඕන:baffled::baffled:

:lol::lol: Sirajnam PhD eka karanna inne "copy paste kirime aluth kalawa" gana man hiththanne...
 

diamonddrago

Member
Oct 13, 2009
4,865
117
0
In the attic...
:lol::lol::lol:

then what about the big bang theory
and all else?

science tells clearly that no god created the world.
it made by the universe itself scientifically.

and lord buddha also told that world is created by the " universal element " :nerd:

then i have a question...
who created the god :dull:

Let us look what Allah Almighty said about the Universe in the Noble Quran:


"Moreover He comprehended in His design the sky, and it had been (as) smoke: He said to it and to the earth: 'Come ye together, willingly or unwillingly.' They said: 'We do come (together), in willing obedience.' So He completed them as seven firmaments in two Days, and He assigned to each heaven its duty and command. And We adorned the lower heaven with lights, and (provided it) with guard. Such is the Decree of (Him) the Exalted in Might, Full of Knowledge. (The Noble Quran, 41:11-12)"



"Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of creation), before we clove them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe? (The Noble Quran, 21:30)"


The Arabic word for "sky" in Noble Verse 41:11 above is "samaa", which is the same word used for "heaven" and "Universe". Since the 7 heavens didn't exist yet (because the seven firmaments or heavens were mentioned in the next Noble Verse 41:12), then this CLEARLY MAKES the "samaa" be referring to the Universe, since the heaven was the entire Universe when GOD Almighty "comprehended in His design the sky". He then later divided it into seven firmaments or heavens.



Anyway, as we clearly see above in the Noble Verses, Allah Almighty initially created the Universe or the "samaa" with smoke (Dukhan). Dukhan in Arabic refers to the smoke coming from fire, which is always HOT GAS.


"And the firmament, We constructed with power and skill and verily We are expanding it. (The Noble Quran, 51:47)"



That above sounds like the Big bang theory to me.....in fact the Quran even speaks of the Big crunch.....google Big crunch....

"The Day that We roll up the heavens like a scroll rolled up for books (completed),- even as We produced the first creation, so shall We produce a new one: a promise We have undertaken: truly shall We fulfill it. (The Noble Quran, 21:104)"


Notice here how Allah Almighty Said that He will ROLL BACK the heavens like a scroll rolled up.


Now to answer your Question....If someone created God wouldn't That be God....?.....:baffled:


In Islam God is an all powerful and kind entity with no Gender...no needs....and no concept of birth or death (time)....
 

prasadana2

Well-known member
  • Sep 19, 2006
    12,509
    135
    63
    CyberSpace
    It is a common complaint among some non-Muslims that Islam would not have millions of adherents all over the world, if it had not been spread by the use of force. The following points will make it clear, that far from being spread by the sword, it was the inherent force of truth, reason and logic that was responsible for the rapid spread of Islam.

    1. Islam means peace.

    Islam comes from the root word ‘salaam’, which means peace. It also means submitting one’s will to Allah (swt). Thus Islam is a religion of peace, which is acquired by submitting one’s will to the will of the Supreme Creator, Allah (swt).

    2. Sometimes force has to be used to maintain peace.

    Each and every human being in this world is not in favour of maintaining peace and harmony. There are many, who would disrupt it for their own vested interests. Sometimes force has to be used to maintain peace. It is precisely for this reason that we have the police who use force against criminals and anti-social elements to maintain peace in the country. Islam promotes peace. At the same time, Islam exhort it followers to fight where there is oppression. The fight against oppression may, at times, require the use of force. In Islam force can only be used to promote peace and justice.

    3. Opinion of historian De Lacy O’Leary.

    The best reply to the misconception that Islam was spread by the sword is given by the noted historian De Lacy O’Leary in the book "Islam at the cross road" (Page 8):

    "History makes it clear however, that the legend of fanatical Muslims sweeping through the world and forcing Islam at the point of the sword upon conquered races is one of the most fantastically absurd myth that historians have ever repeated."

    4. Muslims ruled Spain for 800 years.

    Muslims ruled Spain for about 800 years. The Muslims in Spain never used the sword to force the people to convert. Later the Christian Crusaders came to Spain and wiped out the Muslims. There was not a single Muslim in Spain who could openly give the adhan, that is the call for prayers.

    5. 14 million Arabs are Coptic Christians.

    Muslims were the lords of Arabia for 1400 years. For a few years the British ruled, and for a few years the French ruled. Overall, the Muslims ruled Arabia for 1400 years. Yet today, there are 14 million Arabs who are Coptic Christians i.e. Christians since generations. If the Muslims had used the sword there would not have been a single Arab who would have remained a Christian.

    6. More than 80% non-Muslims in India.

    The Muslims ruled India for about a thousand years. If they wanted, they had the power of converting each and every non-Muslim of India to Islam. Today more than 80% of the population of India are non-Muslims. All these non-Muslim Indians are bearing witness today that Islam was not spread by the sword.

    7. Indonesia and Malaysia.

    Indonesia is a country that has the maximum number of Muslims in the world. The majority of people in Malaysia are Muslims. May one ask, "Which Muslim army went to Indonesia and Malaysia?"

    8. East Coast of Africa.

    Similarly, Islam has spread rapidly on the East Coast of Africa. One may again ask, if Islam was spread by the sword, "Which Muslim army went to the East Coast of Africa?"

    9. Thomas Carlyle.

    The famous historian, Thomas Carlyle, in his book "Heroes and Hero worship", refers to this misconception about the spread of Islam: "The sword indeed, but where will you get your sword? Every new opinion, at its starting is precisely in a minority of one. In one man’s head alone. There it dwells as yet. One man alone of the whole world believes it, there is one man against all men. That he takes a sword and try to propagate with that, will do little for him. You must get your sword! On the whole, a thing will propagate itself as it can."

    10. No compulsion in religion.

    With which sword was Islam spread? Even if Muslims had it they could not use it to spread Islam because the Qur’an says in the following verse:
    "Let there be no compulsion in religion:
    Truth stands out clear from error"
    [Al-Qur’an 2:256]

    11. Sword of the Intellect.

    It is the sword of intellect. The sword that conquers the hearts and minds of people. The Qur’an says in Surah Nahl, chapter 16 verse 125:
    "Invite (all) to the way of thy Lord
    with wisdom and beautiful preaching;
    and argue with them in ways that are
    best and most gracious."
    [Al-Qur’an 16:125]

    12. Increase in the world religions from 1934 to 1984.

    An article in Reader’s Digest ‘Almanac’, year book 1986, gave the statistics of the increase of percentage of the major religions of the world in half a century from 1934 to 1984. This article also appeared in ‘The Plain Truth’ magazine. At the top was Islam, which increased by 235%, and Christianity had increased only by 47%. May one ask, which war took place in this century which converted millions of people to Islam?

    13. Islam is the fastest growing religion in America and Europe.

    Today the fastest growing religion in America is Islam. The fastest growing religion in Europe is Islam. Which sword is forcing people in the West to accept Islam in such large numbers?

    14. Dr. Joseph Adam Pearson.

    Dr. Joseph Adam Pearson rightly says, "People who worry that nuclear weaponry will one day fall in the hands of the Arabs, fail to realize that the Islamic bomb has been dropped already, it fell the day MUHAMMED (pbuh) was born".

    LOL u have copied every thing from http://www.central-mosque.com/fiqh/sword.htm

    1. Islam means peace... in what way? Examples? killing people eye to eye?
    2. Sometimes force has to be used to maintain peace. Here you go Now where is the Religon Of Peace? Violence so was the Sward used now. :baffled:

    3 i have no idea about De Lacy O’Leary.. if he lived now he will surly write another book about Islamic terror..

    4. Muslims ruled Spain for 800 years.. was it there land? Muslims Conqured Spain in 711AD .. :lol:
    Same with the

    Yemen, Egypt, Babylonia and Chaldea [present day Kuwait and Iraq]
    Persia [present day Iran]
    Gandhara [present day Afghanistan]
    Pakistan [part of india]


    5. 14 million Arabs are Coptic Christians...well in Dubai and south Arabia y have they developed? due to the westernization.. skycrapers, Highways, Hummers, they went mentioned in the Koran is it?

    6 Muslims killed hindus over 500 years ... :baffled:

    7-11 BULLSHIT

    12- Of course you people make baby's like animals Breed..

    13 did you know that in ameica there is only :lol:0.6 muslims? and there are more Temples Than Mosques there??
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_United_States

    May be Europe But they ant gona let you people rule there laws..
    + also look @ the number of conversation rates..islam has only few ..
    the only way is there are increasing from the number of birthrates..by marrying 4women.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claims_to_be_the_fastest-growing_religion
     
    Oct 19, 2009
    709
    14
    0
    Ekuser,

    Pictures are not necessary here to say muslims are terrorist, if u can only prove with logic thts enough. if u want to prove with pictures, even i can bring the pictures of muslims who was killed by hindus and christians which will prove nothing. and I feel u run out of logic so you decided to put some terrible pictures .
     

    diamonddrago

    Member
    Oct 13, 2009
    4,865
    117
    0
    In the attic...
    Ekuser,

    For every picture you have here.....i can show you hundreds more showing how Muslims are killed tortured and plain treated less than humans by racist idiots like you....

    you showed the Muslim side of the India incident....why couldn't you find the thousands of Muslims who faced even worse fates.....in the hands of Hindus in India during the same riots?

    why do you ppl only show one side of the story and totally hide the other side?......are you so intimidated & scared by Islam?.....:lol::lol::lol:
     

    diamonddrago

    Member
    Oct 13, 2009
    4,865
    117
    0
    In the attic...
    Muslim leaders condemn Gujarat temple killings, appeal for harmony
    By Danish A Khan
    New Delhi, September 25: Muslim organisations and leaders have widely condemned the Swaminarayan temple killings in Gujarat's political capital, Gandhinagar. Muslim leaders have appealed for the restoration of sanity and mutual brotherhood.

    The western Indian state of Gujarat had recently witnessed anti-Muslim pogroms after a train car burning incident which carried Hindu pilgrims returning from the temple town of Ayodhya last February. Hindu nationalists have vowed to build a temple in memory of the mythical god-king Rama at the site where the historical Babari Masjid once stood, and which was demolished by Hindu nationalist zealots in December 1992.

    The temple incident started Tuesday, September 24, when two terrorists stormed into the vast temple complex despite strong security arrangements. The terrorists who were in the prime of their youth started firing indiscriminately with assault rifles and hurled hand grenades. At least 30 worshippers were killed and dozens grievously injured.

    The operation to flush out the terrorists continued till day-break Wednesday. Three security personnel, including one from the elite commando National Security Guards (NSG), were killed. The terrorists were also gunned down.

    Muslim organisations were unanimous in unequivocally condemning the Gujarat temple killings. Maulana Rabey Hasani Nadwi, president of India’s apex Muslim religious body, All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), came out with a strong condemnation of the killings. Maulana Nadwi said in a message emailed to MG, “Terrorist attack on the Akshardham temple of Gujarat is an inhuman act which I strongly condemn. Killing innocent citizens and attacking religious places of worship is a hateful and dastardly act which must never be permitted.”

    This is a conspiracy to destroy India’s secularism, democracy, mutual understanding and brotherhood. It is the duty of all of us to exercise utmost restraint on this tragic occasion and foil the unholy intention and plots of enemies of the country,” Maulana Nadwi's statement added.

    In a special statement prepared for MG, India's top Muslim scholar Maulana Wahiduddin Khan

    said that "What is happening in Gujarat and elsewhere has nothing to do with religion. Rather, it is an exploitation of religion for political purposes. Moreover, it is not even politics in the real sense of the word. Politics is a noble profession. This kind of religious exploitation degrades politics."

    "Those who indulge in such politics are not true servants of the nation. They cannot even be described as serving even their own political interests. For this kind of practice will ultimately lead to disaster, for both the nation and the exploiter. The ultimate weakness of violence is that it begets the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it," Maulana Khan said in his statement.

    Syed Ahmed Bukhari, imam of Delhi’s historic Jama Masjid, put the onus of the crime on state chief minister Narendra Modi. Blaming him squarely, Imam Bukhari said that the outrageous statements against Muslims made by Modi during his gaurav yatra (pride march) “could have provoked a retaliatory act.” Bukhari has termed the act as “anti-Islamic” and said, “Islam does not permit killing of innocent civilians. I appeal to Muslims and our Hindu brethren to join hands to wipe out terrorism from the country’s soil.”

    Maulana Jameel Ilyasi, president of the All India Organisation of Imams of Mosques, in his scathing remarks said that the attack was most condemnable. “It is a conspiracy to defame Islam and Muslims. The attack is against the teachings of Islam and this kind of anarchy is unacceptable to Indian Muslims,” he said.

    Terming the act as “anti-social,” Abdul Wahab Khilji, a senior funtionary of Muslim representative body All India Milli Council, said that such acts of disruption were only aimed at further weakening the secular foundations of the nation. He said, talking to MG, that forces inimical to the country had hatched a conspiracy to widen the Hindu-Muslim gulf and destroy harmony. “The time has come to expose these forces and deal with them sternly before the nation is brought to ruins,” he told MG.

    Maulana Khilji also demanded a thorough and impartial probe to bring out the whole truth. He regretted that it had become a practice with the present-day rulers to link every terrorist activity with Muslims, and that too when they were not directly involved.

    Prof. Iqbal A Ansari, secretary general of Minorities Council of India, a human rights organisation, said that this heinous and deplorable act should be widely condemned. The temple killings had been deliberately targeted to spread chaos across the nation. “This brings into focus dangerous implications for retaliatory violence continuing for the last 20 years. Action-reaction theory has begun and is likely to continue for the next 20 years,” he said speaking to MG.

    Prof Ansari lamented that Muslims were labelled "terrorists," but what about Sangh Parivar [RSS family] terrorists who had been left scot-free to spread a reign of terror. He demanded that “VHP terrorists”, “Shiv Sena terrorists”, “Bajrang Dal terrorists,” “RSS terrorists,” and other Hindu nationalist terrorists should also be brought to book and accordingly dealt with under the law of the land. Speaking to MG, Prof. Ansari said, “If terrorists like Narendra Modi, Bal Thackrey, Praveen Togadia, Ashok Singhal, Vinay Katiyar, Giriraj Kishore, Lal Krishna Advani and others are not arrested and severely penalised this process of retaliatory violence is not going to stop for years to come.”

    Dr. S. Qasim Rasool Ilyas, chief editor of Afkar-e-Milli magazine and spokesperson of AIMPLB, said that the temple killings were “unfortunate.” Places of worship should not become targets of attacks, but it was none else than Narendra Modi himself who allowed brazen acts of violence against Muslims and wanton destruction of Muslim mosques, graveyards etc during the two-month long anti-Muslim pogrom in Gujarat. After February 28 attacks on places of worship had become rampant.

    Upon being asked by MG whether suicidal attacks were permitted by Islam, Dr. Ilyas said that Ulama hold divergent views on the issue. As such, one group of Ulama permitted the logic of suicidal attacks when no option was left for seeking justice like in the case of Palestinian struggle against the Zionist occupiers. However, in India things were different. Efforts should be made for seeking justice within the parameters of the Constitution and judiciary. The stage had not come when suicide attacks in India could be justified, he added.


    This is the whole story......i don't have shocking images like you....to try and fake the truth with emotions.....

    source > http://www.milligazette.com/dailyupdate/20020925.htm
     
    Last edited:

    diamonddrago

    Member
    Oct 13, 2009
    4,865
    117
    0
    In the attic...
    More evidence...as to why a search into the incident was done.....


    AHMEDABAD: The mystery over the burning of the S-6

    compartment of Sabarmati Express at Godhra on February

    27, which killed 59 passengers and set off an

    unprecedented spate of communal frenzy all over

    Gujarat, has turned deeper with the forensic report on

    the incident discounting the possibility of the mob

    throwing inflammable liquid from outside and then

    setting the bogie on fire.





    Investigations made by the Ahmedabad-based Forensic

    Science Laboratory (FSL) have now shown that almost 60

    litres of inflammable material was poured from inside

    the compartment before it was set on fire.





    A report by the FSL's Assistant Director Dr M S

    Dahiya, which is part of the charge-sheet filed in the

    Godhra case about a month back, is based on a study of

    the pattern of the burns in the compartment and a

    simulated exercise conducted on May 3 to recreate the

    incident. The report contradicts the view held so far

    that the mob which attacked the train threw

    inflammable liquid at the train using buckets and cans

    from a distance, even while the passengers had shut

    all the windows and doors of the compartment.





    To recreate how the crime must have been committed, a

    train bogie was placed at the same spot. Using a

    variety of different containers, it was doused with

    liquid for experimental observation.





    The report said the height of the window of the bogie

    was found to be seven feet. In these circumstances, it

    was not possible to throw inflammable liquids into the

    bogie from the outside with the help of a bucket or a

    jerry-can because by this method most of the liquid

    fell outside the bogie.





    At the spot of the incident, at about a distance of 14

    feet, there was a mound of gravel-stones about 3 feet

    high. It was spread parallel to the bogie for a long

    distance. The FSL officials, standing on the mound,

    threw water on the windows of the bogie, of which only

    about 10 to 15 per cent entered the bogie. The rest

    fell on the outside. Since, a major portion of the

    inflammable liquid fell on the tracks and around it,

    it would have caused damage on the outside of the

    bogie and under it.





    The report says, "after inspecting the bogie and the

    tracks, it was found that there is no effect of fire

    below the windows. Taking this fact into account and

    the burning pattern on the outside of the bogie, the

    conclusion is that no inflammable liquid was thrown

    into the bogie from the outside". It further says, "it

    also does not look possible that inflammable liquid

    was thrown in from the doors of the bogie".





    As a next step, using a bucket, about 60 litres of

    water was thrown into the passage of the compartment

    from one side and then a large part of the bogie was

    covered. Water thrown like this went only in one

    direction, no part of it flowed outside from the open

    doors or in the direction of the latrine.





    "On the basis of this experimental observation, the

    conclusion is that standing in the passage of the

    compartment near seat number 72, using a container

    with a wide opening, about 60 litres of inflammable

    liquid has been poured and then immediately a fire has

    been started in the bogie," the report says.





    The FSL report further says that "it appears that

    three of the four doors of the compartment were open

    when it was burning while all the windows were shut.

    The pattern of burning (allegatoring pattern) shows

    that the intensity of the heat was four times more

    towards the eastern side (towards seat no. 72 of the

    bogies".

    source >

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Articleshow.asp?art_id=14794899
     
    Oct 19, 2009
    709
    14
    0
    LOL u have copied every thing from http://www.central-mosque.com/fiqh/sword.htm

    1. Islam means peace... in what way? Examples? killing people eye to eye?

    "Islam" is an Arabic word which means "submission to the will of Allah". However, the word "Islam" comes from the same roots as the word "Salam"(Arabic), which means "peace".

    2. Sometimes force has to be used to maintain peace. Here you go Now where is the Religon Of Peace? Violence so was the Sward used now. :baffled:

    Yes Sometime force has to be used to maintain peace.Then why current world has police and army ? and more over when you r oppressed you have to protect yourself from enemies

    3 i have no idea about De Lacy O’Leary.. if he lived now he will surly write another book about Islamic terror..

    If some body say good about Islam, No body has idea about him.if someone who is not even passed his secondary college allege islam, you all will have idea about him and post their post as much as possible

    4. Muslims ruled Spain for 800 years.. was it there land? Muslims Conqured Spain in 711AD .. :lol:
    Same with the

    Yemen, Egypt, Babylonia and Chaldea [present day Kuwait and Iraq]
    Persia [present day Iran]
    Gandhara [present day Afghanistan]
    Pakistan [part of india]


    All the land in the world once upon a time was occupied by some one, moreover before Prophet mohammed it was jesus era,before that moses time and so on.so each and every subsequent follower can even claim to be the owner of the particular lands, for eg even current saudi also before the prophet mohammed it was christians as that time Injil(bible) was the accepted religion by allah.only later Islam was revealed to mohammed as final revelation by Allah.

    5. 14 million Arabs are Coptic Christians...well in Dubai and south Arabia y have they developed? due to the westernization.. skycrapers, Highways, Hummers, they went mentioned in the Koran is it?

    it is not clear

    6 Muslims killed hindus over 500 years ... :baffled:

    Can i have any proof??

    7-11 BULLSHIT

    Your self saying

    12- Of course you people make baby's like animals Breed..

    Not really .

    13 did you know that in ameica there is only :lol:0.6 muslims? and there are more Temples Than Mosques there??
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_United_States

    come on man, we are talking about fastest growing religion.not the fastest growing temple or mosques.moreover your same wikipedia itself shows 0.8% muslim population, then which wiki infor is correct 0.6 or 0.8?? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Muslim_population

    May be Europe But they ant gona let you people rule there laws..
    + also look @ the number of conversation rates..islam has only few ..
    the only way is there are increasing from the number of birthrates..by marrying 4women.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claims_to_be_the_fastest-growing_religion

    As far as I know and per CNN(i posted the link earlier) Islam is the fastest growing religion in USA but at the moment i dont have figures about fastest growing due to conversion rate.http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=4d1_1186010536
     
    Last edited:

    diamonddrago

    Member
    Oct 13, 2009
    4,865
    117
    0
    In the attic...
    And finally the why.....:no::no:


    Is this the same Atal Bihari Vajpayee who made that

    celebrated speech in Goa and protected Narendra Modi?

    After the shameful petrol pump scam exposed by the

    Indian Express, how come the prime minister acted so

    fast, and with such conscientious statesmanship?



    Why did he not similarly act and dismiss Narendra Modi

    when thousands of Indians were killed and raped?



    I want to blank out the horrors in Gujarat. I heard

    the survivors convey their deep sense of betrayal.

    Their FIRs are not being registered. If people want to

    return to their homes, then it is with the condition

    that the names in the FIRs be dropped. Be it Godhra or

    after, you only feel shock and anger. I grieve for

    all, irrespective of their religion, caste or status.



    All the guilty must be punished. Why is the Modi

    government and the Centre shy of revealing the names

    of the passengers in the Sabarmati Express on that

    tragic day? Were they all kar sevaks who died, as the

    VHP/BJP claimed? If not, who are they? Why have 19

    bodies still not been identified? What about the

    passengers in the adjacent bogies? Why have their

    testimonies not been taken?



    Why is Advani so hurriedly trashing the forensic

    report, without even allowing a transparent CBI

    enquiry? How was the inflammatory liquid allowed

    inside the carriage? The Modi government was quick to

    declare the Godhra massacre as an ISI conspiracy. If

    so, why were law-abiding Indian Muslims of Gujarat

    punished in such a ghastly manner?



    If it was not the ISI, who are the real killers of

    Godhra?



    According to reports, the Godhra killing was not

    premeditated but a result of a mob violence following

    continuing humiliations at the hands of kar sevaks who

    were mostly travelling ticketless in the trains. I was

    told of some Muslims trying to board the earlier

    Sabarmati Express train on its way to Ayodhya, but who

    were not allowed to. Instead, they were stabbed with

    trishuls by kar sevaks. The same train then returned

    from Ayodhya.



    One report said a policeman registered a complaint

    that kerosene cans and stoves were being carried by

    the kar sevaks which perhaps helped in the mass

    igniting of coach S-6. A magazine reported that a

    handful of anti-social elements carrying jerry cans of

    inflammables were trying to enter the train.



    Let the truth come out. The solution lies within the

    problem. The answer lies in every question asked,

    investigated and made public. Mere inflammatory

    rhetoric for communal polarisation will not do.



    Those responsible for the Godhra killings should be

    punished, as should those who organised the

    post-Godhra carnage with direct support from the Modi

    government. What happened after Godhra was

    orchestrated genocide and Modi is now trying to profit

    from this carnage. Is this possible in any civilised

    democracy? Modi has become a challenge to the

    Constitution of India and the secular, pluralist

    foundations of the Indian State.



    That is why the horrors in Gujarat need to be

    thoroughly probed by an impartial body. Why should

    Hindus and Muslims be made sacrificial goats for the

    vested interests of some politicians?



    The prime minister promised Rs 150 crore for relief,

    but compensation has been a farce. Our image as a

    democratic and liberal country has taken a beating. We

    must reach out and help ordinary people who have been

    devastated. Ninety per cent of Muslim homes have been

    destroyed. Their material assets do not exist. Crores

    have gone up in flames. More than 1 lakh people have

    no home to return to. A father and a son recently

    returned to their home, only to be murdered in their

    sleep.



    The Gujarat government says that 1,000 people died.

    But the truth is that 2,000 Indians are still missing.

    Will they ever be located? Yet, the government wants

    evidence of their murders. Can proof be found in their

    ashes?



    Who do we blame?



    Industrialists do not want to speak out on Gujarat

    because they fear that this may annoy the powers that

    be. How will 12 per cent of defenceless Indians

    rebuild their lives and come to vote if there are

    early elections in the state? Or is it that the 12 per

    cent do not count?



    What gives the BJP, the RSS and the VHP the right to

    be custodians of the Hindu dharma? This is not Sarva

    Dharma Samabhava. The reverence for god should bring

    out the good in each one of us. We, the people of

    India, have to take charge. Hinduism as a way of life

    allows us to grow into good human beings. Those who

    kill, burn and rape are not Hindus. Must liberal

    Indians stand by in silence?



    Why has Vajpayee let the country down? I appeal to

    President Abdul Kalam ? please help reconstruct the

    riot ravaged victims' material and spiritual lives in

    this land of Vedanta. The answer lies within each one

    of us. Let us plant the seed of prosperity, hope and

    right action.


    source > http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/printedition/070802/detPLA01.shtml
     
    Oct 19, 2009
    709
    14
    0
    Ekuser,

    For every picture you have here.....i can show you hundreds more showing how Muslims are killed tortured and plain treated less than humans by racist idiots like you....

    you showed the Muslim side of the India incident....why couldn't you find the thousands of Muslims who faced even worse fates.....in the hands of Hindus in India during the same riots?

    why do you ppl only show one side of the story and totally hide the other side?......are you so intimidated & scared by Islam?.....:lol::lol::lol:

    Their current job is to undermine and insult Islam, so they won't see other side of the story.such a nasty and unjust people.:shocked:
     

    bishop

    Banned
    Apr 29, 2010
    430
    20
    0
    Nobody Knows
    vicious murder and beheading of three Christian schoolgirls in Poso, Indonesia October 29th, 2005.

    Autopsy of Indonesian schoolgirls beheaded for being Christian

     

    diamonddrago

    Member
    Oct 13, 2009
    4,865
    117
    0
    In the attic...
    vicious murder and beheading of three Christian schoolgirls in Poso, Indonesia October 29th, 2005.

    Autopsy of Indonesian schoolgirls beheaded for being Christian

    i don't have the link right now...but this girl was not killed for religious reasons....:oo:

    and she was killed for some other things....
    :(:(:(
     
    Last edited:

    diamonddrago

    Member
    Oct 13, 2009
    4,865
    117
    0
    In the attic...

    i don't have the link right now...but this girl was not killed for religious reasons....:oo:

    and she was killed for some other things....
    :(:(:(

    hmm...wow you were right.....:shocked::shocked:

    so that news site had lied?....:eek::eek:

    The attack

    The three teenagers were walking to a private Christian school in Central Sulawesi province with their friend Noviana Malewa, 15, when they were attacked by a group of six masked men armed with machetes. The attackers left one of the girls' heads outside a church. A note was left with the severed heads, which were dumped in plastic bags in the girls' village, which stated: "Wanted: 100 more heads, teenaged or adult, male or female; blood shall be answered with blood, soul with soul, head with head."[6][7] Malewa, the youngest, survived the attack with serious wounds to her neck.[1] The surviving girl was able to describe the attackers to the police.

    Five suspects, including a former military police officer, were arrested and later released for lack of evidence, although three were subsequently re-arrested. The trial of three men, Irwanto Irano, Lilik Purwanto and Hasanuddin began in November 2006.[8] In February 2007, prosecutors recommended 20-year jail sentences for all three defendants. The prosecutors said they were not seeking the death penalty because the defendants had shown remorse and been forgiven by the victims' families.[9] The sentences were passed on 21 March 2007. Hasanuddin was given 20 years for planning the attack, while two accomplices were given 14 years. Hasanuddin had told the court he helped plan the attack, but he denied allegations he masterminded it.[10]


    On going to jail, Hasanuddin said "It's not a problem (if I am being sentenced to prison) because this is a part of our struggle."[1] Hasanuddin was the leader of the regional Islamic terrorist group Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) for the Poso district.


    source > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_Indonesian_beheadings_of_Christian_girls



    So it was done by yes more terrorist nuts...can't blame Islam for this.....:confused::confused: