අනාත්ම ස්වභාවය | අනත්තං අසාරඛට්ඨේනන්ති

[ek_rosh]

it's buddhas words to call it mara,you cant say harming is not there nature.buddha said only clinging to it drags the samsara.not like clinging to it only brings harming.the web itself is burning.

if you undersand what i say you see it doesnt disagree with what buddha said..

i didnt say clinging only bring harming... you are just going after words instead of whole picture

when clinging is there...self is there..self is there sansara is there... dukka is there...

 

[Yeezus]

BUT he bites only when you touch

 

[Emios]

if you undersand what i say you see it doesnt disagree with what buddha said..

i didnt say clinging only bring harming... you are just going after words instead of whole picture

when clinging is there...self is there..self is there sansara is there... dukka is there...

self is already there when you see them as skandas.no need to cling.

 

[ek_rosh]

snake is never a non harming one.it can bite regardless of the person touching it or not.it has a biting nature to it.if you call a snake non harming its not a correct addressing

biting nature - harmfulness
biting (in action) - harming

if you dont understand the difference, i dont know what to say...

 

[Emios]

biting nature - harmfulness
biting (in action) - harming

if you dont understand the difference, i dont know what to say...

i understand what you say,i'm arguing the other part.

 

[ek_rosh]

self is already there when you see them as skandas.no need to cling.

go study paticcasampuada 101 n come back...you need to learn some basics.. thats the problem here..

 

[Emios]

go study paticcasampuada 101 n come back...you need to learn some basics.. thats the problem here..

no what you learn is wrong thats the issue

 

[ek_rosh]

i understand what you say,i'm arguing the other part.

there is no other part...

burning nature - dukka nature
burning (in action) - causing dukka/harming

 

[Emios]

there is no other part...

burning nature - dukka nature
burning (in action) - causing dukka/harming

you call a snake as non harming its wrong address

 

[ek_rosh]

no what you learn is wrong thats the issue

from my understaning self it there only with clinging. if you see othrwise...good luck

---

you call a snake as non harming its wrong address

didnt you see i said snake is harmful...
------ Post added on Jul 3, 2026 at 11:12 PM

 

[Emios]

from my understaning self it there only with clinging. if you see othrwise...good luck

---

didnt you see i said snake is harmful...
------ Post added on Jul 3, 2026 at 11:12 PM

i saw it.but you said only biiting when touched.snake is not like that.and calling a snake a unharming one is not good

 

[ek_rosh]

i saw it.but you said only biiting when touched.snake is not like that.and calling a snake a unharming one is not good

does the snake bite when you are away?

 

[Emios]

does the snake bite when you are away?

does all those got bitten went on toucing? snakes come for you

 

[ek_rosh]

does all those got bitten went on toucing? snakes come for you

yes, thats why it was called a biting snake...COZ, he does bit when touching..

 

[Emios]

yes, thats why it was called a biting snake...COZ, he does bit when touching..

Not only when touching.he comes for you.how can you call it a non harming one even if not touched.if its that its nature

 

[ek_rosh]

Not only when touching.he comes for you.how can you call it a non harming one even if not touched.if its that its nature

how rupa is harming?

 

[Emios]

how rupa is harming?

Its deceiving cling or not.its not good to call it unharming or itself has no issues.

 

[ek_rosh]

Its deceiving cling or not.its not good to call it unharming or itself has no issues.

how deceiving is harming?

deceiving to what/who?

 

[Emios]

how deceiving is harming?

deceiving to what/who?

Deceiving in the way it attacks you.not only when you cling to it.its a mara.if you say itself has no issues.that i cannot agree with

 

[ek_rosh]

Deceiving in the way it attacks you.not only when you cling to it.its a mara.if you say itself has no issues.that i cannot agree with

Deceiving who and attacking who?