බුද්දාගම ප්රශ්නයක්

Emios

Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    75,207
    67,569
    113
    who said such thing ? we are 2 million years old and it's proven many years ago. you really need to change the source you are getting these data. physics and biology is two different branches and our ancestors are not something like atoms. what you are trying to do here is use some unproven or disprovable hypotheses in physics to deny the fact that we didn't evolve from divine beings. cities have nothing to do whatsoever with our evolution. we didn't build cities just after climbing off from trees. we were hunting apes for millions of years. we started building cities very recently.

    just accept the fact that buddha was wrong.



    Why are you comparing billion years vs a few million years?I repeatedly said 1 kalpa is around 4.56 billion years(You can find it on wiki type kalpa).
    During that period life on earth can be destroyed many times and evolution starts all over again.You're only referring to the latest 2 million years of existence which is nothing compared to 4.56 billion years.

    Just accept the fact you know nothing about buddha
     

    50W

    Member
    Aug 23, 2016
    49
    6
    0
    38
    හෝල්ඩරේ

    no it's the truth and I have given enough evidence to support it. if he could really see the past why did he say we used to live kotis of years which doesn't get along whatsoever with the TOE ?


    I don't see your evidence to support it nor you read the full context which I have written.You keep repeating buddha didn't see the past clearly.At least refer to any text or give a link.You have no evidence to prove how first life came to existence.

    who said such thing ? we are 2 million years old and it's proven many years ago. you really need to change the source you are getting these data. physics and biology is two different branches and our ancestors are not something like atoms. what you are trying to do here is use some unproven or disprovable hypotheses in physics to deny the fact that we didn't evolve from divine beings. cities have nothing to do whatsoever with our evolution. we didn't build cities just after climbing off from trees. we were hunting apes for millions of years. we started building cities very recently.

    just accept the fact that buddha was wrong.



    Why are you comparing billion years vs a few million years?I repeatedly said 1 kalpa is around 4.56 billion years(You can find it on wiki type kalpa).
    During that period life on earth can be destroyed many times and evolution starts all over again.You're only referring to the latest 2 million years of existence which is nothing compared to 4.56 billion years.

    Just accept the fact you know nothing about buddha


    here's in brief what i was repeating for you again and again.
    buddha said humans originated kotis of years ago while science clearly states that we are no older than 2 million years old which means buddha didn't see past and no such power exists.
    buddhism is just another religion with it's own myths and rituals.
     

    thelaa rox

    Well-known member
  • Feb 23, 2009
    15,405
    431
    83
    37
    lonley planet
    මිනිස්සුයි තිරිසන් ලෝකයයි වෙන් වෙන්නේ ශිලය නිසා. මිනිසා සිල්වත් බවින් තොර වෙන්න වෙන්න තිරිසන් සතා සහ මිනිසා අතර වෙනසක් නැහැ. ඒක තමයි මෙතනට දෙන්න තියෙන හොදම පිළිතුර

    ehema gaththoth haawa hoda silwath sathek neda? pansil pada 5ma rakinawa. ehema gaththoth un minissunta wada hoda wenawa neda?