who said such thing ? we are 2 million years old and it's proven many years ago. you really need to change the source you are getting these data. physics and biology is two different branches and our ancestors are not something like atoms. what you are trying to do here is use some unproven or disprovable hypotheses in physics to deny the fact that we didn't evolve from divine beings. cities have nothing to do whatsoever with our evolution. we didn't build cities just after climbing off from trees. we were hunting apes for millions of years. we started building cities very recently.
just accept the fact that buddha was wrong.
Why are you comparing billion years vs a few million years?I repeatedly said 1 kalpa is around 4.56 billion years(You can find it on wiki type kalpa).
During that period life on earth can be destroyed many times and evolution starts all over again.You're only referring to the latest 2 million years of existence which is nothing compared to 4.56 billion years.
Just accept the fact you know nothing about buddha
just accept the fact that buddha was wrong.
Why are you comparing billion years vs a few million years?I repeatedly said 1 kalpa is around 4.56 billion years(You can find it on wiki type kalpa).
During that period life on earth can be destroyed many times and evolution starts all over again.You're only referring to the latest 2 million years of existence which is nothing compared to 4.56 billion years.
Just accept the fact you know nothing about buddha