මොකද්ද මේ Mozilla වල අලුත් බ්‍රව්සර් එකද්ද?

[යකා]

මොකද්ද මේ Mozilla වල අලුත් බ්‍රව්සර් එකද්ද?

කවුද දන්නේ Mozilla Auroraගැන. මොක්ද මේ බ්‍රව්සර් එක?? mozilla firefox නවත්වන්නද යන්නේ? දන්න කෙනෙක් ඉන්නවනම් කියන්න??

 

[යකා]

Bump

 

[sandun36]

Ask from mozilla!

 

[Kumara456]

මොසිල්ල නවත්තන්න දෙන්න බැහැ...

 

[Mozilla]

While Google Chrome may still only have about 10 percent market share in the web browser world, it’s effect on the space has been much greater. For example, remember when Google said that Chrome would begin releasing new versions every six weeks? Well now we’re seeing both Mozilla and Microsoft move towards that type of rapid iteration. In fact, Mozilla has moved so much in that direction that they’ve decided to alter their standard release model.

In a post today on their blog, Mozilla has formally introduced the new channel structure for Firefox builds. And this means the creation of a new type of Firefox build that neither a nightly (read: highly unstable) or beta (read: fairly polished) — they’re calling it Aurora. In Chrome parlance, it’s essentially their “Dev” build.

Previously, Mozilla had a Nightly -> Beta -> Release cycle, but it wasn’t utilized ideally. As they note here, they tried calling the nightly builds “Minefield” to imply they were risky, but that lead beta users to believe their builds should be highly stable (which they weren’t always). So Mozilla is sticking this new Aurora build in between the Nightly build and the Beta build. (They’re also killing off Minefield and replacing it with a build simply called “Nightly” — complete with a new icon.)

Mozilla hopes that this better sets expectations in terms of what users can expect from the various builds. In turn, they hope this will allow them to cycle faster through new builds (for example, Aurora is already technically Firefox 5, even though Firefox 4 was just released).

Again, you can likely thank Google for all of this. Not only have they pushed for rapid iteration with Chrome, but their Dev -> Beta -> Stable channels have becomes pretty well known amongst users. In effect what Mozilla is doing here is making Aurora their “Dev” build, Beta their “Beta” build, and Final Release their “Stable” build. Meanwhile, Firefox Nightly is now more like the builds of Chromium that Chrome developers often try out and develop on, but aren’t meant for regular users.

One thing Mozilla definitely does better here is the icons. If you’re using Aurora, you’ll have a different icon than if you’re using Nightly. (Though Beta and Release are the same standard Firefox icons.) Compare that to Chrome where aside from Chromium’s blue icon, I have no idea what build of Chrome I’m using (without hitting the About area in the menu) as all the icons look the same.

 

[Kumara456]

While Google Chrome may still only have about 10 percent market share in the web browser world, it’s effect on the space has been much greater. For example, remember when Google said that Chrome would begin releasing new versions every six weeks? Well now we’re seeing both Mozilla and Microsoft move towards that type of rapid iteration. In fact, Mozilla has moved so much in that direction that they’ve decided to alter their standard release model.

In a post today on their blog, Mozilla has formally introduced the new channel structure for Firefox builds. And this means the creation of a new type of Firefox build that neither a nightly (read: highly unstable) or beta (read: fairly polished) — they’re calling it Aurora. In Chrome parlance, it’s essentially their “Dev” build.

Previously, Mozilla had a Nightly -> Beta -> Release cycle, but it wasn’t utilized ideally. As they note here, they tried calling the nightly builds “Minefield” to imply they were risky, but that lead beta users to believe their builds should be highly stable (which they weren’t always). So Mozilla is sticking this new Aurora build in between the Nightly build and the Beta build. (They’re also killing off Minefield and replacing it with a build simply called “Nightly” — complete with a new icon.)

Mozilla hopes that this better sets expectations in terms of what users can expect from the various builds. In turn, they hope this will allow them to cycle faster through new builds (for example, Aurora is already technically Firefox 5, even though Firefox 4 was just released).

Again, you can likely thank Google for all of this. Not only have they pushed for rapid iteration with Chrome, but their Dev -> Beta -> Stable channels have becomes pretty well known amongst users. In effect what Mozilla is doing here is making Aurora their “Dev” build, Beta their “Beta” build, and Final Release their “Stable” build. Meanwhile, Firefox Nightly is now more like the builds of Chromium that Chrome developers often try out and develop on, but aren’t meant for regular users.

One thing Mozilla definitely does better here is the icons. If you’re using Aurora, you’ll have a different icon than if you’re using Nightly. (Though Beta and Release are the same standard Firefox icons.) Compare that to Chrome where aside from Chromium’s blue icon, I have no idea what build of Chrome I’m using (without hitting the About area in the menu) as all the icons look the same.

ඇත්තටම මොසිල්ලත් මොසිල්ල ගැන දන්න දේවල්.. මම හිතුව නමට විතරක් මොසිල්ල කියල.. බලද්දි වැඩත් මොසිල්ල වගේම තමයි..

 

[Silver bird]

beta version of firefox 7 or 8

 

[යකා]

Ask from mozilla!

ඒකත් ඇත්තනේ

 

[යකා]

මොසිල්ල නවත්තන්න දෙන්න බැහැ...

 

[යකා]

While Google Chrome may still only have about 10 percent market share in the web browser world, it’s effect on the space has been much greater. For example, remember when Google said that Chrome would begin releasing new versions every six weeks? Well now we’re seeing both Mozilla and Microsoft move towards that type of rapid iteration. In fact, Mozilla has moved so much in that direction that they’ve decided to alter their standard release model.

In a post today on their blog, Mozilla has formally introduced the new channel structure for Firefox builds. And this means the creation of a new type of Firefox build that neither a nightly (read: highly unstable) or beta (read: fairly polished) — they’re calling it Aurora. In Chrome parlance, it’s essentially their “Dev” build.

Previously, Mozilla had a Nightly -> Beta -> Release cycle, but it wasn’t utilized ideally. As they note here, they tried calling the nightly builds “Minefield” to imply they were risky, but that lead beta users to believe their builds should be highly stable (which they weren’t always). So Mozilla is sticking this new Aurora build in between the Nightly build and the Beta build. (They’re also killing off Minefield and replacing it with a build simply called “Nightly” — complete with a new icon.)

Mozilla hopes that this better sets expectations in terms of what users can expect from the various builds. In turn, they hope this will allow them to cycle faster through new builds (for example, Aurora is already technically Firefox 5, even though Firefox 4 was just released).

Again, you can likely thank Google for all of this. Not only have they pushed for rapid iteration with Chrome, but their Dev -> Beta -> Stable channels have becomes pretty well known amongst users. In effect what Mozilla is doing here is making Aurora their “Dev” build, Beta their “Beta” build, and Final Release their “Stable” build. Meanwhile, Firefox Nightly is now more like the builds of Chromium that Chrome developers often try out and develop on, but aren’t meant for regular users.

One thing Mozilla definitely does better here is the icons. If you’re using Aurora, you’ll have a different icon than if you’re using Nightly. (Though Beta and Release are the same standard Firefox icons.) Compare that to Chrome where aside from Chromium’s blue icon, I have no idea what build of Chrome I’m using (without hitting the About area in the menu) as all the icons look the same.

අෆ්‍ෆට එල එල මොසිල්ලා... ඉදිරි වැඩ ක‍ටයුතු එහෙම කොහොමද? ක්‍රෝම් එකට වැ‍ඩේ දෙනවද

 

[Mozilla]

අෆ්‍ෆට එල එල මොසිල්ලා... ඉදිරි වැඩ ක‍ටයුතු එහෙම කොහොමද? ක්‍රෝම් එකට වැ‍ඩේ දෙනවද

උබ කාටවත් කියන්න එපා.මං වැඩ කරන්නෙත් ක්‍රෝම් එකේ...

 

[යකා]

beta version of firefox 7 or 8

එහෙමද firefox version update වෙනවා ඉවරයක් නෑ.මොකද දන්නෑ

 

[යකා]

උබ කාටවත් කියන්න එපා.මං වැඩ කරන්නෙත් ක්‍රෝම් එකේ...

හුටා.. ක්‍රෝම් එකේ හොර ගල් අහුලනවද?

 

[යකා]

ඇත්තටම මොසිල්ලත් මොසිල්ල ගැන දන්න දේවල්.. මම හිතුව නමට විතරක් මොසිල්ල කියල.. බලද්දි වැඩත් මොසිල්ල වගේම තමයි..

 

[T h u s h]

While Google Chrome may still only have about 10 percent market share in the web browser world, it’s effect on the space has been much greater. For example, remember when Google said that Chrome would begin releasing new versions every six weeks? Well now we’re seeing both Mozilla and Microsoft move towards that type of rapid iteration. In fact, Mozilla has moved so much in that direction that they’ve decided to alter their standard release model.

In a post today on their blog, Mozilla has formally introduced the new channel structure for Firefox builds. And this means the creation of a new type of Firefox build that neither a nightly (read: highly unstable) or beta (read: fairly polished) — they’re calling it Aurora. In Chrome parlance, it’s essentially their “Dev” build.

Previously, Mozilla had a Nightly -> Beta -> Release cycle, but it wasn’t utilized ideally. As they note here, they tried calling the nightly builds “Minefield” to imply they were risky, but that lead beta users to believe their builds should be highly stable (which they weren’t always). So Mozilla is sticking this new Aurora build in between the Nightly build and the Beta build. (They’re also killing off Minefield and replacing it with a build simply called “Nightly” — complete with a new icon.)

Mozilla hopes that this better sets expectations in terms of what users can expect from the various builds. In turn, they hope this will allow them to cycle faster through new builds (for example, Aurora is already technically Firefox 5, even though Firefox 4 was just released).

Again, you can likely thank Google for all of this. Not only have they pushed for rapid iteration with Chrome, but their Dev -> Beta -> Stable channels have becomes pretty well known amongst users. In effect what Mozilla is doing here is making Aurora their “Dev” build, Beta their “Beta” build, and Final Release their “Stable” build. Meanwhile, Firefox Nightly is now more like the builds of Chromium that Chrome developers often try out and develop on, but aren’t meant for regular users.

One thing Mozilla definitely does better here is the icons. If you’re using Aurora, you’ll have a different icon than if you’re using Nightly. (Though Beta and Release are the same standard Firefox icons.) Compare that to Chrome where aside from Chromium’s blue icon, I have no idea what build of Chrome I’m using (without hitting the About area in the menu) as all the icons look the same.

මෙක කොපි පෙස්ට් කලාට මෙකෙ තියෙන දෙවල් ඔයා දන්නවද?

 

[යකා]

මෙක කොපි පෙස්ට් කලාට මෙකෙ තියෙන දෙවල් ඔයා දන්නවද?

ඒකනේ මූ හොරෙන් කිව්වේ ‍ක්‍රෝම් එකේ වැඩ කොරන්නේ කියලා

 

[Mozilla]

මෙක කොපි පෙස්ට් කලාට මෙකෙ තියෙන දෙවල් ඔයා දන්නවද?

ඔයාගේ කොපි ටික මං ලෑස්ති කරලා තියෙන්නේ වෙලාවක් බලල දෙන්නම්...

 

[T h u s h]

ඔයාගේ කොපි ටික මං ලෑස්ති කරලා තියෙන්නේ වෙලාවක් බලල දෙන්නම්...

අනේ දෙන්නනම් එපා අය්යේ..මට බයයි..හොද අය්යනේ.. මට දෙන්න එපා කුමාර අය්යට විතරක් දෙන්න..

 

[Mozilla]

අනේ දෙන්නනම් එපා අය්යේ..මට බයයි..හොද අය්යනේ.. මට දෙන්න එපා කුමාර අය්යට විතරක් දෙන්න..

ඉවසලා හිටපන්. ටින් ටින්ට දැන් කීවට වැඩක් නැ ඒවා අයින් කරන්න කියලා.ඔක්කොම මගේ ලග තියෙනවා.......ඉක්මනට මං ත්‍රෙඩ් එකක් හදලා දාන්නම්.

 

[Kumara456]

ඉවසලා හිටපන්. ටින් ටින්ට දැන් කීවට වැඩක් නැ ඒවා අයින් කරන්න කියලා.ඔක්කොම මගේ ලග තියෙනවා.......ඉක්මනට මං ත්‍රෙඩ් එකක් හදලා දාන්නම්.

මගේ ළගත් විස්තර ගොඩා...ක් තියෙනවා..ෆෝන් නම්බරේ ඉදලම...