Beginning of the Universe ?

Y2K

Member
Jun 11, 2007
11,007
165
0
In your heart
Yes thats right .............. Bible or Quran both written by man according to the will of God / Allah ............... People like to be different but if you examine the facts it is reasonable to B'live we are brothers
 

Y2K

Member
Jun 11, 2007
11,007
165
0
In your heart
nj542 said:
yes...........our brains and understanding is not enough to comprehend the teachings of lord budda...........

budda didn't thought those teaching before he was enlightened.......
he teach them after he was enlightened........

so we will understand what he thought and would be interpret them through science if we can attain enlightenment.......and of course must have a very in depth knowledge about science too..otherwise can't interpret them through science.......


My dear friend God has promised to send his some prophets to help out the humans to bring salvation or escape from the round of birth or whatever name you call ...... if he didn't do it human can not have this greatest teachings ...........
 

Y2K

Member
Jun 11, 2007
11,007
165
0
In your heart
Remember my dear friends God can do anything .......... so he can influence people to spread his words ............... result was the Holy Bible & Quran ( some scholars B'live that Quran is more accurate than bible less corruption that bible
 

Y2K

Member
Jun 11, 2007
11,007
165
0
In your heart
Y2K said:
Clay Pots
Is common sense allowed as we consider how
our lives and this universe got here?

theory of evolution - intelligent design
theory of evolution - intelligent design

Email article to a friend

Archaeologists will say that a clay pot is solid evidence that a civilization once lived there. No one believes that the ground, or wind, or chemicals randomly assembled to form that clay pot and accidentally painted a design on it. People made it. If a simple clay pot shows human design, what do we conclude about an object whose make up is far more complex? Like, the human eye. It can distinguish among seven million colors. It moves 100,000 times each day with automatic focusing. And the eye handles 1.5 million simultaneous messages.1

Are we to believe that though a clay pot did not arise from natural means, the human eye just came about from elements in the atmosphere? Some would say that science demands such a conclusion, because to believe in God is not scientific. How is that different from finding the clay pot and starting with the assumption that people didn't exist in that location, so scientists must now find out how that clay pot developed from the elements in the ground or air.2

We're told that producing a human eye takes a long time. It is assumed that such random chance takes a great amount of time to perfectly assemble something complex.

theory of evolution - intelligent designSo, here is a test. Let's say someone handed you a plastic bag filled with all the parts to a watch, where you were certain that all the correct springs, screws, discs are in that bag. How long would you be willing to shake that bag hoping that the pieces would fall together and the screws would each find the right hole and tighten nicely? There must be some possibility that it could happen. Picture yourself shaking that bag. You probably wouldn't shake it beyond 30 seconds. Why not? Because common sense tells you that no matter how long you shake that bag, the pieces will never align to become a working watch. It wouldn't matter if you shook that bag one minute or thousands of years.

Just because someone argues that "maybe, someday, somehow, by chance"... should that line of reasoning supersede common sense? Like the Emporer's New Clothes, shouldn't there be a voice in the crowd saying, "Yeah, but complex life arising from simple non-life is such an outside chance, wouldn't it make more sense to look for another explanation?"

What about the likelihood of life on Earth? Maybe you are aware of all the perfect conditions that were necessary for us to be here: the earth's perfect distance from the sun, the perfect combination of gases in our atmosphere, the perfect tilt and rotation of Earth, the perfect gravitational force, the presence of water, and on and on.

Astrophysicist George Smoot explains that the degree of fine-tuning required for life to exist on Earth would be similar to shooting an arrow all the way to the planet Pluto (four billion miles away) and having the arrow come within a hundred yards of the target.3

Do you like to bet? Would you be apt to bet if the odds were 5:1 against you? How about if they were 6,000:1 against you? If you were to bet on the universe developing without a Designer, the odds of our universe forming on its own is 10124 to 1.

Again, just because there is a vastly remote chance that all the requirements perfectly fell into place by chance, why would a reasonable person conclude that it actually did come about that way? If the odds of a jet making it safely to its destination were 10124 to 1, who would get on that plane? We are so reasonable in so many areas of life. We look at clay pots and watches and are willing to say that obviously people made these, even if we don't see those people. Could not the same logic be used when we consider the human body and the universe?

Don't the intricacies of the human body and the universe give reason to say, "Though I don't see him, it makes most sense to conclude that God exists"?


Read this Carefully my friend

"God is the ultimate cause "
 

Y2K

Member
Jun 11, 2007
11,007
165
0
In your heart
Why do we need string theory?

The goal of theoretical physics is to find a theory that can unite all fundamental forces. In 1970s, the standard model based on quantum field theory has been able to unite electromagnetic force, strong and weak nuclear forces. However, to incorporate the gravitational force into the quantum field theory was very difficult. The string theory, which is dramatically different from quantum field theory, turns out to be quite successful in uniting all fundamental forces.

What is string theory?

In this theory, all fundamental particles are considered as the vibrational modes (patterns) of a fundamental string. The "particles" are analogous to the "notes" in music. Different vibrational frequencies of a violin string produce different notes. Similarly, different vibrational modes of a fundamental string give rise to different particles.

The most important "prediction" of the string theory is that the space must NOT be three dimensional (length, width and height). If the fundamental string can vibrate only in three dimensional space, no meaningful results can be obtained. To derive the observed properties of all fundamental particles, the fundamental string must vibrate in a space with 9 or 10 dimensions.

How come we do not see extra dimensions?

Currently, there are two different models that may explain why we do not see the 6 or 7 extra dimensions: compactification and braneworld. The compactification model assumes that the extra dimensions are simply too small to be observed. This model was proposed first because similar idea has been suggested as early as in 1920s.

In the braneworld model proposed by Randall and Sundrum, the reason why we cannot see extra dimensions is because we are confined in a braneworld (with 3 dimensions of space) that is embedded in the bulk universe (with 9 or 10 dimensions of space). This model is based on the study of D-branes, a feature arising from the boundary condition on the ends of an open string. According to this model, photons and all other particles (except gravitons) cannot escape from our braneworld. Therefore, we cannot see anything outside our braneworld.

Can string theory unite science with religion?

For religious people, the braneworld model should be much more exciting than the compactification model. If the compactification model were true, there would be no place for God. The braneworld model opens the possibility for the existence of other braneworlds or even some intelligent life in the bulk universe. Since the bulk universe has more dimensions than our braneworld, it has more degrees of freedom. The intelligent life in the bulk universe should be much more powerful than us.
 

Y2K

Member
Jun 11, 2007
11,007
165
0
In your heart
String Theory: Knowing the Mind of God

The human race can and will know the mind of God, the origin of the universe, and how our physical world works. The answer is in the complex and mysterious world of String Theory. For the past 75 years physicists have strived for the ultimate goal of a unified theory of physics. This effort has been futile but now String Theory offers a new hope to end that search. String Theory has been developing for more than 20 years with a break through here and there and finally today we have the best option to explain our universe. When scientists look toward the big bang there is a hazy cloud surrounding it because of the extreme temperatures involved. But the answer is not going to come from physical observation it will be mathematical. String Theory allows physicists to combine the equations of general relativity (the equations of the very large) with the equations of quantum mechanics (the equations of the very small). This allows scientists to look at the big bang with more detail than ever before. The consequences of this are absolutely profound for we as human beings will be able to know how the universe came into existence and what the fate of the universe will be. There is some opposition to string theory but all of the other arguments can be put down by simple logical reasoning.

First let’s start by going through a brief overview of the search for a theory of everything. Currently four basic forces govern our physical universe: the weak nuclear force, strong nuclear force, electromagnetic force, and gravity. Each force emits a field that permeates throughout space. The strong and weak nuclear forces are responsible for holding atoms together and radioactive decay (A tiny particle could smash a big hole…). The electromagnetic force governs magnets and the light spectrum which is responsible for all types of light including: microwaves, radio waves, infrared waves, and visible light. There are even force particles that govern forces such as the photon for the electromagnetic force and the W and Z particles for the weak nuclear force (Ross 1). Gravity is the most widely know force but it is the weakest and in the standard model it has no force particle. This is a counterintuitive thought that gravity is the weakest but it is true because gravity is only effective on large scales. As the string physicists Brian Greene puts it “an ordinary refrigerator magnet can pick up a paper clip, thereby overcoming the pull of the entire earth’s gravity” (255). The ultimate goal is to have the theory of everything that will govern all of these individual forces with one set of equations.

Albert Einstein is considered the first person to actively search for a theory of everything. After developing his theories of relativity he was compelled to search for a theory of everything because of quantum mechanics. He was upset that according to quantum mechanics the world of particles is based on probability. This means that a scientist could never know where exactly a particle is. Einstein showed his disgust for this with the famous phrase “God does not play dice” (Einstein qtd. in Hawking 26). Quantum mechanics is a field of science dealing with the very small. The orders of magnitude that quantum mechanics deal with are about a plank length which is about 6.626x10^-34. When physicists examine our world at that size they must use mathematics and have a vivid imagination because our instruments can come nowhere near this tiny size. When they work through their equations they find a world of fluctuations and uncertainty (Hawking 44-45). In Einstein’s time quantum mechanics had just emerged as an infant theory and it was revolutionary. Einstein saw the problem with quantum mechanics and it was that the equations of quantum mechanics did not work with gravity so he set out to find a theory of everything to solve the problem. Einstein spent the last 30 years of his life in utter isolation searching for this theory and he never got to see it realized (Hooft, Gerard ’t, et al). This idea of a theory of everything was pushed aside for the next thirty years.

The idea of this theory regained popularity in the 1960’s and 1970’s but at the time a theory called the standard model was accepted and for most general cases it is accepted today. It is “a theory that accurately describes all the forces and particles we observe in our laboratories and provides a basis for understanding virtually everything else in physical science” (Weinberg). The standard model describes the smallest most fundamental constituents of matter as tiny points that we know as particles. There are 57 different fundamental particles including: electrons, quarks, and neutrinos. Everything in the universe is made up of these tiny particles as they combine to form atoms and molecules all the way up to human beings. String theory suggests that “if we could examine these [fundamental] particles with even greater precision-a precision many orders of magnitude beyond our present technological capacity-we would find that each is not point like but instead consists of a tiny, one-dimensional loop” (B. Greene). String theory may seem unnecessary, the saying goes “if it isn’t broke don’t fix it” well it is broke and small points need to be even smaller strings. It has to deal with the fact that the standard model describes virtually everything in the universe. The standard model cannot describe our world on very, very tiny scales which automatically puts that model into serious doubt as to ever being a theory of everything. String theory will solve this problem.

String theory is sometimes referred to as super string theory and has been around since about 1970 when it was discovered by Yoshiro Nambu of the University of Chicago. At first the theory was looked at as a misconception because it could only describe certain particles. But years later it was found that if two particles were described together using a principle of “supersymmetry” every particle could be described hence the name super string theory (String as a Theory of Everything). Many odd features arise when we are describing string theory; for starters string theory’s equations describe our world as a vibrating symphony of harmonics. The tiny strings vibrate in different ways to form the 57 elementary particles described by the standard model. The vibrations from these strings can be looked at as similar to how a violin string when vibrated produces different sounds. Instead of sounds, however, the strings produce different particles. The shorter the wavelength of the vibrating string the more mass the particle will have (Hawking 52). Because of this odd universal nature of string theory it offers its first proof of being the answer and it has to deal with gravity and quantum mechanics. The reason gravity does not work with quantum mechanics is because there is no force particle that governs gravity on very small scales. It has been proven that if physicists could find a way to describe gravity on very small scales they would be a huge step closer to the theory of everything.

String theory offers this proof with the graviton particle. The equations of string theory describe a particle that would be the “messenger particle of gravity” called the graviton (Zee). This is compelling evidence that string theory is the answer to a theory of everything by offering a particle to describe gravity at very tiny scales. An objection has been raised that this means nothing until we have detected the graviton but the reason we have not is because of our limited technological capacity. Considering gravity is the weakest force it implies a single graviton would be so weak that actually detecting it may not be possible for quite some time, if ever. The equations have proven that the graviton must exist and physicists have fitted these equations into other ideas offering even more evidence that string theory is correct.

A major argument against String theory is that almost nothing it describes has been experimentally proven but physicists such as Brian Greene hope that with the next generation of particle accelerators String Theory may become fact. Difficulties arise with the equations due to how many dimensions string theory describes. In everyday life we all experience three dimensions front and back, left and right, up and down but according to string theory there are ten dimensions with one being time: “A string has to vibrate in 10 space-time dimensions, which implies that six extra dimensions exist that are too small to have yet been detected” (Bousso and Polchinski). According to string theory these extra dimensions are curled up but are impossible to detect because of their size (Bousso and Polchinski). These six extra curled up dimensions can be imagined as extremely small six dimensional shapes placed side by side. These shapes have been named Calabi-Yau shapes and could come in many different varieties (Greene 369). Although they have not yet been detected it is thought that with more powerful particle accelerators physicists will be able to detect them. Another affect of these next particle accelerators would be that they could possibly give us the first physical string. Even more amazing is that these particle accelerators could be capable of forming very tiny black holes but no reason to fear because they would disappear as fast as they came.

With all of this new insight into the world of the very small within the next few years we will be seeing the hard work of string physicists become fact.

An amazing feature of string theory is that it is not just strings that are involved, the equations also include branes. These branes exist as very large multi-dimensional planes and may even be large enough to be the so called “borders” of our universe. The easiest way to imagine these branes is as a two dimensional (but they can be any number of dimensions less than or equal to eleven) surface that strings can attach to at one or both ends and even lie on these one-dimensional branes (Bousso and Polchinski). The most exciting part of string theory describes these branes as being the boundaries of our universe. Imagine the universe being surrounded by six walls forming a cube containing our universe. Our universe would be inside a hypothetical three dimensional brane and since open strings attach to branes no string could ever escape the universe. The key point of this idea is that it explains why we are not able to detect the other dimensions. Since the strings are bound within the branes it means that no particle such as a photon of light could detect the other dimensions outside our universe since they are actually strings that are bound within our three-brane. This gives a logical answer to why we do not see other dimensions (Greene 391-394).

One exception to the fact that nothing could leave our three-brane is the graviton. Since the graviton is a closed loop string it would not get stuck to the brane because only open ended strings get attached. This allows the graviton to leave our brane, seek out other dimensions and come back to allow us to detect it. This is excellent because it allows the extra dimensions to be as large as a human hair without physicists being able detect them because gravity is so weak we cannot detect it at any smaller levels (Green 400). This reiterates the fact that string theory is on the verge of physically being proven and gives more backing to the fact that it is the “theory of everything”. This brane scenario also gives way to many ideas such as having other universes outside our own. We would be living in a multi-verse!

The best argument against string theory has to deal with the number of solutions possible to the equations. Thousands of solutions exist for string theory and this fact has placed a large cloud of doubt around string theory. Recent advancements in combing these solutions have lifted that cloud. The approach is called string model building (Flam). The string theorist Edward Witten has worked through these many possible solutions and discovered an interesting fact. “Some of the equations involved are a kind of mirror image of other equations called dualities” (Filkin 261). According to Stephen Hawking “not to take this web of dualities as a sign we are on the right track would be a bit like believing that God put fossils into the rocks in order to mislead Darwin about the evolution of life” (57). These dualities have been found to be particularly important in specifically five versions of the equations. Those five versions are named: Type 1, Type 2B, Type 2A, Heterotic-0, and Heterotic-E (Hawking 56). When combined these different string theories form one string theory named M-theory. M-theory is precise in calculating many different calculations dealing with the universe which proves that without a doubt string theory is the theory of everything and that it is more powerful than ever thought possible.

With all of this evidence proving that string theory is the theory of everything it means that we must wait for better instruments to physically prove it. Our theories are beyond our technological capacity. With every barrier knocked down that has been put before it, string theory is still standing as it continues to cast all doubts aside. With the next generation of particle accelerators we will finally see string theory’s physical proof. Whether it is a single part of string theory that solves the mystery or a combination it will be the greatest accomplishment in science. String theory has proven that it can solve the problem between gravity and quantum mechanics and string theory has solved the many problems it has created. Some of those problems have dealt with dimensions and the number of solutions. The implications will be farther reaching than anything the human race has ever accomplished and will give us the ability to see our world in a whole new way. We will finally be able to look at the moment of creation. Who knows maybe we will even see God himself jump starting the universe.
 

Y2K

Member
Jun 11, 2007
11,007
165
0
In your heart
String Theory
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search


“String me up with ropes and chains.”

~ Oscar Wilde on his string theory

“Dude! Like, what if the entire universe were just a bunch of vibrating strings, man?”

~ Leonard Susskind at Woodstock

“Ehhh Uhhhh Ahhhhhhhhhhhh Uh Uh UHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.”

~ Steven Hawking on G-String Theory

“In soviet Russia, strings ends YOU with zero.”

~ Russian reversal on strings

“Well, somebody was on crack.”

~ Psychologist on String Theory
 

Y2K

Member
Jun 11, 2007
11,007
165
0
In your heart
String theory

String theory is the theory of string panties. It claims that since a girl who wears string panties will get more attention than a girl that wears ordinary panties, bearers of string panties will ultimately make their trousers more and more thin and stretchy or heavy and baggy so that more and more of the string panty will be visible for the naked eye, which is odd, since it is not the string at all that catches the attention but the body part that is surrounding it.
 

Y2K

Member
Jun 11, 2007
11,007
165
0
In your heart
String Theory is a very, very vast and complex subject, and only monks who spend their whole life on it can reach the mysteries of knots, which lies beyond the Tao.

There are seven initiation steps :

* The Shoelace Knot step, being the first one, is the easiest, but yet requires amazing concentration, and monks have to spend years studying the Force to properly master the stunning Bunny-ears maneuver.
* The second step, the boating knots step, is far more difficult than the first one, and young apprentices (known as padawans) have to spend several years sailing until they can walk on water, to master this complex and subtle subject.
* The third step lies in the deep, black and silent pools of the cavernous Quantum Physics : monks have to spend up to three years in a special room, called the University, to reach a level of interior peace high enough to perceive the mysteries of the Tao.
* The other steps are mind elevation steps through the contemplation of the Tao and mastering of the Force.

One these steps finished, the Knots Masters can master their body and their mind, and gain supernatural powers, like ubiquity, through a space-time continuum rupture or levitation through a shifting of their Karma in the 27th dimension and a displacement of their Ka in the 13th along the lines of force of the Spiritual Whole God, or cast powerful spells, like Cowation, or even reach the Nirvana and bring back powerful artifacts, like a Blade +3 of Roses, or even a monk-only Carshemir + 5 which can invoke magical Guinea Pigs.

In fact, the ultimate goal of the String Theory is to deviate photons using the dimensions 4 to 37.17 (the space-time having a fractal shape, this is not a problem). Once this trouser deviation is perfected, one of the monks studying the field hopes to unknot a pantie or two.

Masterful use of string theory can lead to the mastery of all variety of master uses!
 

Vishwalisha

Junior member
  • Nov 24, 2007
    931
    20
    18
    Kandy
    Y2K said:
    Clay Pots
    Is common sense allowed as we consider how
    our lives and this universe got here?

    theory of evolution - intelligent design
    theory of evolution - intelligent design

    Email article to a friend

    Archaeologists will say that a clay pot is solid evidence that a civilization once lived there. No one believes that the ground, or wind, or chemicals randomly assembled to form that clay pot and accidentally painted a design on it. People made it. If a simple clay pot shows human design, what do we conclude about .................................................................................................... give reason to say, "Though I don't see him, it makes most sense to conclude that God exists"?

    I think that everything is perfectly made because of evolution. Earth has the right conditions for life to exist. Life exists because it has adapted (evolved) to the environment. If the conditions of the earth slowly change, life would evolve to suit these conditions.

    Please correct me if i'm wrong...:-) im just 14.:yes:
     

    x-pert

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    20,952
    77
    0
    Vishwalisha said:
    I think that everything is perfectly made because of evolution. Earth has the right conditions for life to exist. Life exists because it has adapted (evolved) to the environment. If the conditions of the earth slowly change, life would evolve to suit these conditions.

    Please correct me if i'm wrong...:-) im just 14.:yes:

    Scientists, especially Chandra Wickremasinghe, Fred Hoyle, have shown that the life bagan due to a cosmic explosion etc..

    Some believe that the world is a creation of a so called GOD.

    No one can question anyone about their belief bro :) I believe in what you believe. But again slightly I believe there should be another unseen force behind it... maybe god. or maybe a shooting star.

    Anyway life is evolving and it's all about "survival of the fittest" .

    So don't try to believe what others say to you. As a 14 year old person I'm sort of amazed about your knowledge.. :D :D Weldone!

    Reminds me a song by Bob Marly

    Preacherman, dont tell me,
    Heaven is under the earth.
    I know you dont know
    What life is really worth.
    Its not all that glitters is gold;
    alf the story has never been told:
    So now you see the light, eh!
    Stand up for your rights. come on!

    Most people think,
    Great God will come from the skies,
    Take away everything
    And make everybody feel high.
    But if you know what life is worth,
    You will look for yours on earth:
    And now you see the light,
    You stand up for your rights.

    So brother :) Believe in yourself and try to find things by yourself :)

    here are some links for you to read about the evolution of life :D (From a scientifical perspective)
    http://www.actionbioscience.org/newfrontiers/wick_hoyle.html
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_evolution
    http://draget.net/hoe/index.php
    http://exploringtime.org/?page=segments
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution
     

    Y2K

    Member
    Jun 11, 2007
    11,007
    165
    0
    In your heart
    x-pert said:
    Scientists, especially Chandra Wickremasinghe, Fred Hoyle, have shown that the life bagan due to a cosmic explosion etc..

    Some believe that the world is a creation of a so called GOD.

    No one can question anyone about their belief bro :) I believe in what you believe. But again slightly I believe there should be another unseen force behind it... maybe god. or maybe a shooting star.

    Anyway life is evolving and it's all about "survival of the fittest" .

    So don't try to believe what others say to you. As a 14 year old person I'm sort of amazed about your knowledge.. :D :D Weldone!

    Reminds me a song by Bob Marly

    Preacherman, dont tell me,
    Heaven is under the earth.
    I know you dont know
    What life is really worth.
    Its not all that glitters is gold;
    alf the story has never been told:
    So now you see the light, eh!
    Stand up for your rights. come on!

    Most people think,
    Great God will come from the skies,
    Take away everything
    And make everybody feel high.
    But if you know what life is worth,
    You will look for yours on earth:
    And now you see the light,
    You stand up for your rights.

    So brother :) Believe in yourself and try to find things by yourself :)

    here are some links for you to read about the evolution of life :D (From a scientifical perspective)
    http://www.actionbioscience.org/newfrontiers/wick_hoyle.html
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_evolution
    http://draget.net/hoe/index.php
    http://exploringtime.org/?page=segments
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution


    Macahn Suvival of the fittest ne ............... machan apita survive wela wadak na ...try to escape from this cycle ...... Dharmaya dakinna thamai jayaganne .....
     

    Y2K

    Member
    Jun 11, 2007
    11,007
    165
    0
    In your heart
    x-pert said:
    Scientists, especially Chandra Wickremasinghe, Fred Hoyle, have shown that the life bagan due to a cosmic explosion etc..

    Some believe that the world is a creation of a so called GOD.

    No one can question anyone about their belief bro :) I believe in what you believe. But again slightly I believe there should be another unseen force behind it... maybe god. or maybe a shooting star.

    Anyway life is evolving and it's all about "survival of the fittest" .

    So don't try to believe what others say to you. As a 14 year old person I'm sort of amazed about your knowledge.. :D :D Weldone!

    Reminds me a song by Bob Marly

    Preacherman, dont tell me,
    Heaven is under the earth.
    I know you dont know
    What life is really worth.
    Its not all that glitters is gold;
    alf the story has never been told:
    So now you see the light, eh!
    Stand up for your rights. come on!

    Most people think,
    Great God will come from the skies,
    Take away everything
    And make everybody feel high.
    But if you know what life is worth,
    You will look for yours on earth:
    And now you see the light,
    You stand up for your rights.

    So brother :) Believe in yourself and try to find things by yourself :)

    here are some links for you to read about the evolution of life :D (From a scientifical perspective)
    http://www.actionbioscience.org/newfrontiers/wick_hoyle.html
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_evolution
    http://draget.net/hoe/index.php
    http://exploringtime.org/?page=segments
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

    GIndara words tika
     

    Y2K

    Member
    Jun 11, 2007
    11,007
    165
    0
    In your heart
    Vishwalisha said:
    I think that everything is perfectly made because of evolution. Earth has the right conditions for life to exist. Life exists because it has adapted (evolved) to the environment. If the conditions of the earth slowly change, life would evolve to suit these conditions.

    Please correct me if i'm wrong...:-) im just 14.:yes:


    Evolution can't do anything ....................... only a master plan can do something or may be anything ............

    anyway thank you for your comments ............... good thoughts keep it up
     

    Y2K

    Member
    Jun 11, 2007
    11,007
    165
    0
    In your heart
    nj542 said:
    who is GOD?????:rofl: :rofl:


    Who are you ? where did you come from ? where might you go ? find the aswer to these question then you can find who is GOD

    Kingdom of heaven already has come....... its in side you and outside you
     

    nuwanoo7

    Well-known member
  • Jul 18, 2007
    4,057
    56
    48
    kurunegala
    buhaha...... ha............ the god create the wold..................... then who is the crater of god.............. [i hope you give the answer to me y2k]
     

    Y2K

    Member
    Jun 11, 2007
    11,007
    165
    0
    In your heart
    nuwanoo7 said:
    buhaha...... ha............ the god create the wold..................... then who is the crater of god.............. [i hope you give the answer to me y2k]


    ok God Question ...................( I guess you have not read my previous articles "Something" & "Anything"

    God is the ultimate cause .....

    Machan think of a train there may be 5 or 6 blocks ..... if some one ask which one is pulling what ....then we can say 6 pulling 5 , 5 pull by 4 ....................4 < 3 .... 3 < 2 but you don't ask who is pulling the 1st block ? B'coz you know 1 st one greats its own power ............ no other box to pull 1 st block... 1 st Block creats its own energy to pull all the other blocks as well

    machan magen hawoth Nirwanaya koheda tiyenne kiyala hari .... ube Heaven eka mata pennapan kiyala hari ............ matath ubatath denna Physical evidence ekak na ... but apita menna mehema kiyanna puluwan ............... Nirwanaya kiyanne ... Bowthika seyak demai ... Thrushnaway nathi karagaththama hari sasara bami welin midunama ... apita mahath u suwayak hithata dannenawa anna eka thamai nirwanaya kiyala


    Heaven eka gana lassana kathawath tiyenawa ...

    Ekka Father kenekgen lamayek hauwa father Apaya saha heaven eka tiyenne koheda kiyala .............. father poddak wela idala kiwwa puththa oyage muna hariyata wadurekge wage kiyala ............ me lakayata godak tharaha giya ...... ethakota father kiwwa putha onna oka thamai apaya kiyala ........... lamaya poddak kalpana karala kenthiya adu karagena nawaththa karuna awabodakaragena sitha sahallu karagaththa ...puththa anna oka thamai suwargaya kiyala .................. me podi katha wen lamaya godak dewal therum gaththa


    ithin macahn apita Nirwanaya ... Heaven eka .... God wa pennanna kiwwoth kiyanna theyenne ekai ........... God is pure Love , God is the power of the world