Core i7 965 XE Races Through to 4.20 GHz

zCexVe

Active member
  • Sep 12, 2006
    8,550
    22
    38
    Where I'm now
    It's high time to break the dogma. Core i7 965 Extreme, Intel's next generation flagship desktop processor based on the Nehalem architecture, does indeed overclock satisfactorily. IT OC Taiwan overclocked the chip, which sports an unlocked FSB multiplier, to a respectable 4.20 GHz, at a FSB speed of 200 MHz, and multiplier value of 21.0xFSB. A vCore setting of 1.72 V was used, which is above the danger-mark, taking Intel's own warnings into account. The CPU was aided by dual-channel DDR3-1600 memory operating at timings of 8-7-7-24. It provided a tested bandwidth of close to 16,000 MB/s. The CPU took 3DMark Vantage for a spin, with 3596.76 plans/s in CPU Test 1, and 32.87 steps/s in Test 2. The chip used in the attempt was an engineering sample.

    34a.jpg


    34b.jpg


    34c.jpg

    34e.jpg


    34d.jpg
     

    GNS

    Member
    Jan 3, 2007
    11,148
    16
    0
    UF., Gampaha.
    yo Mr. V, what da hell, why there are only 32KB cache for L1? :confused:

    even my Ath X2 4200+ also has 64KB L1 ne :confused:

    & my L1 cache total is same as i7's L1 cache :nerd:
     

    GNS

    Member
    Jan 3, 2007
    11,148
    16
    0
    UF., Gampaha.
    GNS said:
    yo Mr. V, what da hell, why there are only 32KB cache for L1? :confused:

    even my Ath X2 4200+ also has 64KB L1 ne :confused:

    & my L1 cache total is same as i7's L1 cache :nerd:


    where is this zCeeeeeexVeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    GNS said:
    yo Mr. V, what da hell, why there are only 32KB cache for L1? :confused:

    even my Ath X2 4200+ also has 64KB L1 ne :confused:

    & my L1 cache total is same as i7's L1 cache :nerd:
    So what's the problem?
    Eg: Lamborghini Gallardo vs, Nissan GTR. 5000cc vs 3800cc. Which is faster? The 3800cc Nissan :P :P

    You can compare caches in the same family!!! When everything else is kept "same", then more cache makes a slight difference.

    Edit: Ah btw, even AthlonXP had 128kB L1 :rofl:
     
    Last edited: