මේ වැඩෙන් වෙන්නේ ලංකාවේ මද්යම පාන්තිකයන් මන්ද පෝෂණයෙන් පෙලීම ආරම්භ වීම.
ආණ්ඩුවෙන් මේ ගෙන යෝජනා නම් හරි යන්නේ නැහැ......මේකට වෙන විසදුමක් ඕනි .......
Latest ads
-
Sell your Land, House on idamata.lk for FREE
- sajith.xp.pk
- Updated:
-
Handmade Character Soft Toys- anil1961
- Updated:
-
Bodim.lk out now !- Manoj Suranga Bandara
- Updated:
-
Power Lifting Lever Belt- SkullVamp
- Updated:
-
port.lk Domain for sale
- Lankan-Tech
- Updated:
EDUCATION IN SRI LANKA
- Thread starter neo76
- Start date
ආණ්ඩුවෙන් මේ ගෙන යෝජනා නම් හරි යන්නේ නැහැ......මේකට වෙන විසදුමක් ඕනි .......
In the first place, even though the education is free, that is funded through gov taxes which is again the money of the public who get that education. It's not the money of the rulers.
I don't know where you got your info regarding the degree and education rates in the developing countries because even the literacy level of India is far lower than Sri Lanka, save for the degrees.
You cannot compare free and paid education with developed countries because the very word "developed" shows that they have money and we do not. We cannot do as they do, and if we could, then before that the west will stop harassing us on human rights for killing Prabhakaran.
And then, to crown it all, please look at the contradiction in your own perception: you expect children to not get gastritis, and to pay for their education. But if the child cannot be fed properly will there be a chance of paying for school?
Please note that a poor country as we are, we still need free education. Thanks to the free education given so far, millions of people have changed their social classes to higher levels, and found work all around the world. If you expect every one who gets free education to get a degree, then you are mistaken my friend because, forgetting all other arguments, human brain and physique differ from each other, and hence the difference in ability.
එක ඇත්ත. මම හිතන්නේ සහනදායි පදනමකට ආණ්ඩුවෙන් හරි non-profit organization වලින් හරි අවස්ථා ලබාදෙනවනම් හොදයි. එක පාඩු නොලබන වියාපාරයක් විදියට ගෙනියන්න පුළුවන්.
එතකොට සුදුසුකම් තියෙන ඕන කෙනෙකුට (දුප්පත්, පොසත්) ඉගනගන්න පුළුවන්. එතකොට තමයි නියම නිදහස් අද්යාපනය තියෙන්නේ. සල්ලි පස්සේ රස්සාව කරාම ගෙවන්න පුළුවන්.
Mama kiyanne naha mama kiyana de hari kiyala.
Mama kiyana de waradi wenna puluwan.
Thank you for replying this topic.
Habai dan thiyana system eke hatiyata,
only a very minority (comparatively) get free education opportunities for tertiary education.
But, the very rich people can send their children abroad and can give them tertiary education.
What I say, is we have to try to expend these tertiary education facilities to middle class citizens as well.
For the very poor people, government backed up scholarship scheme etc could be proposed.
only a very minority (comparatively) get free education opportunities for tertiary education.
But, the very rich people can send their children abroad and can give them tertiary education.
What I say, is we have to try to expend these tertiary education facilities to middle class citizens as well.
For the very poor people, government backed up scholarship scheme etc could be proposed.
Sri Lanka is not a very rich country.
So, we can't ask the government to give tertiary education for all.
That is not a feasible target.
Even the so-called developed countries also do not do that.
If we could promote education tourism, we could generate much income.
The universities could be made self sustainable units.
(i.e. They don't have to ask much financial aid from government)
Plus, they can increase the number of free tertiary education given to Sri
Lankan students, utilizing the money made out from Education Tourism.
I might be wrong at any point.
Open for discussion.
So, we can't ask the government to give tertiary education for all.
That is not a feasible target.
Even the so-called developed countries also do not do that.
If we could promote education tourism, we could generate much income.
The universities could be made self sustainable units.
(i.e. They don't have to ask much financial aid from government)
Plus, they can increase the number of free tertiary education given to Sri
Lankan students, utilizing the money made out from Education Tourism.
I might be wrong at any point.
Open for discussion.
owa nikan surathal kathane.... padu nolabana/laba nolabana widiyata charitiyak karanna puluwan un lankawe innawane.... ane mahaththayo kerena wadak kiyanna.....
ohoma charity hoya hoya yana welawe profit balan inna ekekuwa set kara gaththanan ara charity campus gahanna hithaddi mehe degree denna patan ganna puluwan....
exactly. The universities should be taken as non-profit organizations.
They could generate more income through education-tourism.
And with that money, they can increase the number of local trainees getting
free tertiary education.
I never meant that we should reduce the number of intake for tertiary education. I was talking about how to increase the number of intake for free tertiary education.
Even in the current setup, the extremely rich people can give tertiary education for their kids. I was talking about how to extend that facility to the middle class as well
owa nikan surathal kathane.... padu nolabana/laba nolabana widiyata charitiyak karanna puluwan un lankawe innawane.... ane mahaththayo kerena wadak kiyanna.....
ohoma charity hoya hoya yana welawe profit balan inna ekekuwa set kara gaththanan ara charity campus gahanna hithaddi mehe degree denna patan ganna puluwan....
LOL
Machangz,
Recently I came across this information.
I heard some people (they are educated, respected people) describing their observation.
They were saying that some of the graduates who passed out from foreign, paid universities, performed better than the local graduates.
This is a highly subjective observation. So, I'm not sure about the validity of this observation.
But, by any chance, if this is true, then, time has come to think twice about the quality of our tertiary education.
Above all, the said foreign graduates who performed well, obviously have obtained much less than local graduates at A/L.
If this observation is valid/ true, we have to think of ways in improving the quality of our university education. I have hardly seen local universities performing course content analysis or analysis/ feed back of any lecturer, and comparison them with internationally/ widely accepted standards. At the same time, it's a widely accepted fact that Sri Lanka is producing some graduate programmes, at an inappropriate quantity, that government finds difficult to make them employed when they get graduated. (e.g. Arts degrees) I'm not saying that they are not needed. They can teach, history etc to the new generation. But, the quantity they are produced may be too much, so that they have to do picketing at Lipton circus/ in front of Pettah station to get a job. But, for some degrees, they don't have to wait until government gives them a job. They have a much high demand in the private sector.
Back to the topic again. Re : foreign universities. They can't survive in the market, if the graduates they produce can't meet the global standards requirements. So, I too believe that these private sector university teaching and course content must be very effective and appropriate.
Recently I came across this information.
I heard some people (they are educated, respected people) describing their observation.
They were saying that some of the graduates who passed out from foreign, paid universities, performed better than the local graduates.
This is a highly subjective observation. So, I'm not sure about the validity of this observation.
But, by any chance, if this is true, then, time has come to think twice about the quality of our tertiary education.
Above all, the said foreign graduates who performed well, obviously have obtained much less than local graduates at A/L.
If this observation is valid/ true, we have to think of ways in improving the quality of our university education. I have hardly seen local universities performing course content analysis or analysis/ feed back of any lecturer, and comparison them with internationally/ widely accepted standards. At the same time, it's a widely accepted fact that Sri Lanka is producing some graduate programmes, at an inappropriate quantity, that government finds difficult to make them employed when they get graduated. (e.g. Arts degrees) I'm not saying that they are not needed. They can teach, history etc to the new generation. But, the quantity they are produced may be too much, so that they have to do picketing at Lipton circus/ in front of Pettah station to get a job. But, for some degrees, they don't have to wait until government gives them a job. They have a much high demand in the private sector.
Back to the topic again. Re : foreign universities. They can't survive in the market, if the graduates they produce can't meet the global standards requirements. So, I too believe that these private sector university teaching and course content must be very effective and appropriate.
The other observation I made, I liked to share with you all.
Ane manda, mama me topic eka allagena yana dura wadiyda kiyala..
When you want to develop a city, you don't have to look into each and every process.
You simply improve the infra structure facilities (e.g. roads, electricity etc) and the people and business get automatically drained to that area. More facilities and more transactions means, government gets more tax income indirectly. These tax rupees again can be made use to provide better facilities to citizens. At this level, I guess we can call that city is being developed.
Likewise, when you want to develop a country, if you could give a good/ effective education to citizens, they automatically get engaged to production and services, and the more they are educated the quality or the product/ service improves. So, more transactions means government is getting more and more indirect taxes. These tax rupees can be utilized to provide better facilities to citizens.
That's how i understood about development of a country through education.
(unlike what we are doing now - exporting unskilled labor, which has so many social consequences as well
)
Ane manda, mama me topic eka allagena yana dura wadiyda kiyala..
When you want to develop a city, you don't have to look into each and every process.
You simply improve the infra structure facilities (e.g. roads, electricity etc) and the people and business get automatically drained to that area. More facilities and more transactions means, government gets more tax income indirectly. These tax rupees again can be made use to provide better facilities to citizens. At this level, I guess we can call that city is being developed.
Likewise, when you want to develop a country, if you could give a good/ effective education to citizens, they automatically get engaged to production and services, and the more they are educated the quality or the product/ service improves. So, more transactions means government is getting more and more indirect taxes. These tax rupees can be utilized to provide better facilities to citizens.
That's how i understood about development of a country through education.
(unlike what we are doing now - exporting unskilled labor, which has so many social consequences as well
)
Your observations are totally wrong
. Countries like Switzerland Norway and all Scandinavian countries are having free education. Please get right information before present anything
. Although in other Europe countries do not have such stem their annual income per person(GDP) is way higher than that in srilanka (38000 $ in Germany to 2000$ in srilanka).Therefore for them spending money over education is not an issue.
Other thing is Comparing India for education is a big joke
.
මේ තර්කය වැරදියි සහොදරයා.
අපි නොමිලේ අද්යාපනය දෙනවා කියන එක තනිකරම බොරුවක්.
දවසෙම වැඩ කරන කම්කරුවෙක් හවස කෑමට ගන්න පාන් ගෙඩියෙන්, දවසම හිගා කාලා තමන් ඉන්න තැනට යන හිගන මනුස්සයෙක් ගන්න බස් ටිකට් එකන් පවා මේ රටේ මිනිස්සු ගෙවනවා අපි ඉගෙනගන්නවට. එහම මිනිස්සු ගෙවපු සල්ලි වලින් උගන්නපන් කියන එක අසාදාරන ඉල්ලීමක්ද.නැහැ එහෙව් සල්ලි වලින් 1% යි දෙන්නේ ආ ඉදා ඉගෙන ගනින් කියල. හුගක් එවුන් තමන්ගෙ අතින් වියදම් කරල හරි දරුවට මොකක් හරි තැනකින් පාටමාලවක් කරල දෙනවා.
ඉතින් එහම ඉන්න එකද හරි?දුප්පත් රටක ආන්ඩුව අදයාපනේ වෙනුවෙන් මැදිහත් වුනේ නැත්නම් ඒ රටට ගොඩ ඒමක් නෑ. මොකද දුප්පත් මිනිස්සුන්ට ඉගෙනගන්නවාට වඩා එදාවේල කන එක වැදගත්.
ආයේ ඔය නොමිලේ අද්යාපන කතාව කියන කොට පොඩ්ඩක් හිතල බලන්න.
Eka aththa.
Aanduwa nidahas adyapanaya dunne naththnam, hungak ayata adyapanaya gana hithannawath labenne naha
Similar threads
