Hela History - Hidden history of a great culture.

Reshmi85

Banned
May 21, 2009
885
0
0
Watching you...........
amila_90210 said:
then what sort of "evidence" you really asking a video...or a press conference record:shocked:

Or you are asking about or DNA analysis report of a fossil nail of king Rawana, founded in somewhere..or is it just a joke...evidence 5000 years back sort of what:eek:
What ever you have other than RAMAYAN... If you too depend only on that... to me it is a joke... Then Mahavansa has a better base...
 

amila_90210

Member
Jul 5, 2008
17,444
436
0
෴පද පේළී෴
Reshmi85 said:
What ever you have other than RAMAYAN... If you too depend only on that... to me it is a joke... Then Mahavansa has a better base...
who on earth cares Ramayan( except few dumb Indians) :lol::lol:
..it s a good literature work;)...lol non other than that...

there are
ancient scripts written by Rishis( wise Ppl)....they have sort of "evidanse" that u might believe...Read rawanna puwatha & Eda heLadhiwa if you interestd:eek:.
 

twisted

Well-known member
  • Feb 21, 2008
    34,398
    818
    113
    upon purple clouds
    amila_90210 said:
    who on earth cares Ramayan( except few dumb Indians) :lol::lol:
    ..it s a good literature work;)...lol non other than that...

    there are
    ancient scripts written by Rishis( wise Ppl)....they have sort of "evidanse" that u might believe...Read rawanna puwatha & Eda heLadhiwa if you interestd:eek:.

    lol ramayanaya is so biased it's like a bad bollywood script, while ravanna puwatha makes some sense.

    anyway history we know today isn't what really was back then, those who wrote it might have been biased, indulgent.

    and then belief is a weird thing, lots of proofs were dragged upon your eyes, you still yield to what pleases your mind. facts are less likely found when it comes to history.
     

    amila_90210

    Member
    Jul 5, 2008
    17,444
    436
    0
    ෴පද පේළී෴
    twisted said:
    lol ramayanaya is so biased it's like a bad bollywood script, while ravanna puwatha makes some sense.

    anyway history we know today isn't what really was back then, those who wrote it might have been biased, indulgent.

    and then belief is a weird thing, lots of proofs were dragged upon your eyes, you still yield to what pleases your mind. facts are less likely found when it comes to history.
    not only that even mahawansha our golden history book is biased..it has intentionally changed the history ...

    Yes we believes is what pleases us :):) almost always..So i believe Dasis Rawana was not mythical :lol:
     

    twisted

    Well-known member
  • Feb 21, 2008
    34,398
    818
    113
    upon purple clouds
    amila_90210 said:
    not only that even mahawansha our golden history book is biased..it has intentionally changed the history ...

    Yes we believes is what pleases us :):) almost always..So i believe Dasis Rawana was not mythical :lol:

    ya mahavansa shall not receive anything but faith of those who shall have faith in it :lol:.

    me too would like to believe that, that theory isn't alone anyway and i would like to read more about those egyptian notes of the tribe who helped them deliver massive stones in air. :)
     

    xNxzV

    Member
    Nov 26, 2008
    30
    0
    0
    and the saddest part is that to most of our sinhala people ravana is a villain and rama is a hero...tsk
     

    Reshmi85

    Banned
    May 21, 2009
    885
    0
    0
    Watching you...........
    I have few questions... ...
    Some say Mr Mahinda Rajapakse comes from some King Vijayabahu... To which dynasty he belongs to... Ravana or Vijaya.....
    And which other kings belong to Ravana Dynasty......
    What happen to the nation which came down from Vijaya and Bhadda kachchayana...
    How can we recognize people who belong to Sri Lanks and who belong to India