
you put the argument i guess you have to prove it yourself. besides what i'm asking is pretty straight forward.First I need to know how Islam recognizes animals which are only meat eaters, what are their characteristics? Then I will give you an example of the kind of animal that is... like I said.. meat eating look-a-like (no kidding) there are such animals.. so let me know how Islam would distinguish carnivores / herbivores or omnivores.. so we'll continue this discussion after that ok!

Wal Bada said:Once again going around circles. Either you have intention of killing or either not have it. No indirect way of intention of killing. Demand blah . . blah . . is not a part of intention. You can throw a brick out of your window in to you garden because usually there are no people in the garden. But if that brick hits a cockroach and it gets killed, no sin, because intention of killing is not there.
scoobyy said:Ithin lankawe halal karanawa athi ban
Why dont you understand buddy..they always have two ways if they need a nice delicious chicken dish.RajNOX said:![]()
isn't this seems logic.. if your in the part of increasing demand... then you are the reason for the increase of supply (if the resources are available).. in other words this is simple econ man..
if you still say that this is not true.. then wht u suppose me to say..




lemmi knowfreon said:you put the argument i guess you have to prove it yourself. besides what i'm asking is pretty straight forward.
give me an example of meat eating look-a-like animal that you are talking about.
if you feel like you need to prove what you talk,its up to you. if not thats fine with me![]()
freon said:1. Knowing the animal is live - no rocket science
2. Intention of killing the animal - you know how you feel haha..
3. Planning for a method to kill - nothing major, just use your hands
4. Carrying out the deed of killing - bang,bang
5. Animal actually getting killed. - you need to wash your hands, no burials here
you have committed a sin here
but the easy way is:
1. just off the lights
2. bang, bang, bang
see no intention, no plan no execution but still you get the end result..
see the difference
BTW, do you know any meat eating look-a-like animal ?lemmi know

Sahanhl said:Ya ya wat's this!????????

sri_lion said:how did you come to a conclusion that all animals has characteristics of Carnivores are infact carnivores



freon said:![]()
for your information i dint do the the classifications
btw, why do you need my classification anyways. if theres any meat eating look-a-like animal exist as you claim you just put its name here, thats it![]()

Great!! 

blind bashing?me?sri_lion said:Oh!! so you were simply blind basing!Great!!
![]()
you need to prove you are not by giving a meat eating look-a-like animal

freon said:blind bashing?me?you need to prove you are not by giving a meat eating look-a-like animal
still need my support to prove your arguments??too badd![]()

still looking for the meat eating look-a-like animalsri_lion said:Whatever makes you happy dude.. I thought the way commented, you know what you are talking about!! well.... my bad!!![]()


freon said:still looking for the meat eating look-a-like animal![]()
freon said:1. Knowing the animal is live - no rocket science
2. Intention of killing the animal - you know how you feel haha..
3. Planning for a method to kill - nothing major, just use your hands
4. Carrying out the deed of killing - bang,bang
5. Animal actually getting killed. - you need to wash your hands, no burials here
you have committed a sin here





freon said:but the easy way is:
1. just off the lights
2. bang, bang, bang
see no intention, no plan no execution but still you get the end result..
see the difference![]()



holy yah 



Wal Bada said:Don't step on your tail mate. This is not related religous posts
Wal Bada said:Don't step on your tail mate. This is not related religous posts
uh.. sory for the disturbance of your conversation..sri_lion said:Suppose you meet someone, you are not married.. and the other person says he/she not married either.. and you have no way of knowing if that is really true or not... so how exactly having sex with such person can be wrong?
Unless ofcourse you have sex without that person's consent!!So that is what I was talking about.. I dont know what you talking about!
as said in..Wal Bada said:For the sin of sexual misconduct to happen following should happen.
1. Realize that the person married
2. Plan out a method to carry out the act (or intention)
3. Carrying out the act
4. Feeling happly / gratified after the act.
Assuming that this guy is unmarried and of legal age, if he knowns that the lady is married, he completes all four parts. If he does not know that she is married, or if she had lied to him that she is not married, sin of misconduct will not happen, ebcause the 1st part is not fulfilled. Whatever way, that particular women will complete the sin of misconduct.
Wal Bada said:Hope that I have answered your question.
senira said:wats haram
prohibited stuffs in islam.Sahanhl said:Ya ya wat's this!????????