Know Islam one question at a time

[kanna@d_unit]

mama nawathinawa.

"diamonddrago"

ubata deyyangema pihitai..

ubalage aagamata nigaa karanne nathuwa me thread eka puluwannam nawathwapan

 

[Tom Riddle]

MAMA buddhist and other religions wala ayagen illa sitinawa me thread ekata aayeth posts daanna epa kiyala, mama daapu posts QUOTE karala me muslim sahodarayaa daala thiyana posts poddak kiyawala balanna......

eyalage mole diga palala oyalata hodaata therei....

danna akuru dekakuth ne methana **ka uda daagena ka gahanawa.. mewa kiyawanakota age mail kelin wena wa thamai aath aawa iwasagena paaduwe idapan

meka moda payannakage thawath moda aathal ekak
meken ape agam athara thiyana sambanda ya paluduwela methana muslim n other religions kiyala teams dekak hadena eka thamai wenne...

jaya wewa......

Mamath oya wage deyak kiyanna hitiye

Mu mahaa gon adala nethi uthtarayak daala dala hitanawa hariyata uththara dunna kiyala.

Ane manda. Uththara mechcharama pahath mattame thiyei kiyala mama hituwe nehe

 

[diamonddrago]

Guns kill people? Totally irrelevant

Yes it is a stupid question because a simple Google search would have provided you with the answer




Although this question has often been asked jokingly, it is occasionally posited in rhetorical fashion by anti-evolutionists who use this apparent conundrum as “proof” that the Theory of Evolution is flawed. In fact, it is the premise of the question that is flawed, and not evolutionary theory.

Evolution is not a linear process in which one new species evolves to “replace” the old one, as the question implies. Instead, it is a much more complicated process in which new species generally arise by branching from an original line of ancestors. Separate branches then evolve along different trajectories, the outcome of which may include radical change, minor change, no change, or extinction. Survival of a particular evolutionary line is dependent upon the ability of its members to live and reproduce in their environment. Where evolution produces species that are in direct competition with each other, the species that is better-suited for survival will often “win out” and replace the other. However, species often evolve characteristics that allow them to occupy specific niches, in which they exploit environmental resources in different ways. Thus, two or more branches of the evolutionary tree may continue to coexist and co-evolve. Changes to the environment, such as Ice Ages, also influence the course of evolution, creating new niches in which new species are able to thrive. Both of these ideas are illustrated by the evolution of mammals from reptiles. A few mammal species were able to coexist alongside reptiles during the Age of Dinosaurs, despite having evolved from them. However it was environmental change, in the form of global cooling, that allowed mammals to flourish, and displace reptiles as the dominant class of large terrestrial animal. Nonetheless, reptiles persist on Earth, including some, such as crocodiles, that have changed little since ancient times.

This brings us to the central flaw in this oft-quoted rhetorical question. Evolutionary biologists do NOT make the argument that humans evolved from any modern apes we see on Earth today. Instead, they make the assertion that humans and modern apes, such as gorillas and chimpanzees, evolved from a common ancestral line that diverged as much as twenty million years ago (by some estimates) or about five million years ago (according to others). Early human-like ancestors were able to survive because they were better adapted to grassland environments, which were becoming more widespread at the time, than were the ancestors of modern apes, which were predominantly tree dwellers. Thus, there is no implication that any species of ape must have become extinct for humans to survive. Unfortunately, popular misconceptions about evolution, and not the real science of the theory, have led to misunderstandings such as those exemplified by the question above.



See how I give you logical, objective answers? Your answers consist of quoting the Quran and adding smilies to cover up the inadequacy of your replies.

And you keep dodging people's questions and answer something else.

you copy pasted...i try to answer from what i know and research....not copy paste things about something totally different...and think i answered...

some members here are not as bright...or don't know that much English......i have to account for them too....your talking like an immature selfish brat....who only sees the world from one point of view....

sorry for the personal attack...trying to prove a point....

and i happen to use smileys alot...in any post i make....doesn't mean i hide something behind it...means i type in this format...

go look through my posts....

 

[smallvilleclerk50]

Mamath oya wage deyak kiyanna hitiye

Mu mahaa gon adala nethi uthtarayak daala dala hitanawa hariyata uththara dunna kiyala.

Ane manda. Uththara mechcharama pahath mattame thiyei kiyala mama hituwe nehe

1. 90% මුස්ලිම්ස්ලා, සහ මේ සයිට් 1 ඉන්න සියලුම මුස්ලිම්ලා කුරාණයවත්, නවීන දැනුමවත් හරියට නොදනි( කෙටියෙන් කිව්වොත්, මැටි කදන් )
2. තම නොදත්කම වහගන්න පාවිච්චි කරන ක්‍රම 3යි. එකක් හිමීට මග ඇරලා යෑම, අනික, අදාල නැති හෙන හෑල්ලක් ගොං ඉස්මයිලි සමග දෑම, ජිහාඩ් ක්‍රමය දැමීම

 

[diamonddrago]

Non-Muslim site yes. It is a Christian site which says that THEIR God has also forbidden eating Pork.

You are still dodging questions like you always do

Why does the Quran say not to eat pork?

Why does the Quran not say anything about any other animal? (ex- Crow, Cockroach etc)

Why does the Quran say to perform circumcision?

This is not 3 questions. I am simply repeating questions other people have asked because you have not satisfactorily answered them.

And no, having in your answers does not justify them.

BECAUSE IT IS NOT HEALTHY....Pigs flesh is toxic

BECAUSE PPL HAVE COMMON SENSE....the quran specifically says about Pig and dog meat....and some about fish...other animals are not specifically said....coz if that goes on most of the Quran would be about animals and food...so left to common sense...if you doesn't have the common sense not to eat a cockroach its your funeral...

BECAUSE IT IS MORE HEALTHY....meaning dirt and viruses doesn't get under the foreskin and cause unnecessary infections....

these are Islam's reasons' which i have already given...along with valid modern day medical sites validating the same claims....

anything else?....or is this magically not clear?...or unacceptable answers?...that is what ppl who don't want to accept answers say....

 

[diamonddrago]

mama nawathinawa.

"diamonddrago"

ubata deyyangema pihitai..

ubalage aagamata nigaa karanne nathuwa me thread eka puluwannam nawathwapan

lol...sure sure...don't let the door hit you on the way out....

like an undergrad going to a Phd. class.......

 

[Tom Riddle]

you copy pasted...i try to answer from what i know and research....not copy paste things about something totally different...and think i answered...

some members here are not as bright...or don't know that much English......i have to account for them too....your talking like an immature selfish brat....who only sees the world from one point of view....

sorry for the personal attack...trying to prove a point....

and i happen to use smileys alot...in any post i make....doesn't mean i hide something behind it...means i type in this format...

go look through my posts....

You answer from what you know? Well you see that's the problem. You know precious little. And it seems you will never learn.

I give you a scientific, research answer and your reply is that I copy pasted. Is that your answer? Did you even read through it? Why don't you try to refute what it says?

Copy pasted kiwwa shape wuna.

I provided a direct answer to your question. Something that you never do.

Some members are not as bright? You are accommodating them? That would at least explain the dumb replies to many questions . Many would be brighter than you, looking at your posts.

You are the biggest frog in the well I know. You are blinded by your religion. And the biggest joke is you do not realize it, though everybody who goes through your posts will.

I guess there must be somewhat better explanations for the questions, but you seem too ignorant to answer them properly.

You've been totally pwned in this thread. It hasn't been covered up by long replies with 0 substance

 

[Tom Riddle]

lol...sure sure...don't let the door hit you on the way out....

like an undergrad going to a Phd. class.......

Further proof that you are an ignorant little brat

You don't get a Phd by going to classes. You research on your own and come up with something new.

Something that is not opinionated and based on fact. So that people who are not blind can accept it.

I myself will stop when I can no longer prevent myself from falling off the chair from laughter at your replies.

Anyway, you keep posting if you want to give Muslims and Islam a bad name.

 

[diamonddrago]

You answer from what you know? Well you see that's the problem. You know precious little. And it seems you will never learn.

I give you a scientific, research answer and your reply is that I copy pasted. Is that your answer? Did you even read through it? Why don't you try to refute what it says?

Copy pasted kiwwa shape wuna.

I provided a direct answer to your question. Something that you never do.

Some members are not as bright? You are accommodating them? That would at least explain the dumb replies to many questions . Many would be brighter than you, looking at your posts.

You are the biggest frog in the well I know. You are blinded by your religion. And the biggest joke is you do not realize it, though everybody who goes through your posts will.

I guess there must be somewhat better explanations for the questions, but you seem too ignorant to answer them properly.

You've been totally pwned in this thread. It hasn't been covered up by long replies with 0 substance

lol....bitter much....

i didn't really read any of your posts really...coz i know the kind of sites you pull that out of.....

atleast i don't pretend to be smarter....

seriously and honest to God....i have never met vegetable cases like some ppl here.....before in any forum i have been to....even stupid french had smarter responses than you....

if only you guys wanted to learn and actually read my posts with at least a shred of common sense....

the only people who behaved worse were Indians....didn't expect this from sri lankans....especially Buddhist at that....

 

[diamonddrago]

Further proof that you are an ignorant little brat

You don't get a Phd by going to classes. You research on your own and come up with something new.

Something that is not opinionated and based on fact. So that people who are not blind can accept it.

I myself will stop when I can no longer prevent myself from falling off the chair from laughter at your replies.

Anyway, you keep posting if you want to give Muslims and Islam a bad name.

lol...hint hint....

my God man...you assume things about me....and refuse to use your common sense..typical racist....why do you think i added the word class room with Phd....

i just wanted to prove my point....and you did it brilliantly....

 

[dulanar]

සත්ව ඝාතනයට එරෙහිවීම නොව ගව ඝාතනයට එරෙහිවීමයි. විටෙක එය ද කුතුහලයකි. මන්ද ගව ඝාතනයට එරෙහිවන ප්‍රධාන දහමන්වල ඕනෑම සුභ කටයුත්තක් අරඹන්නේ මගුල් ඛෙරයක් වාදනය කරමිනි. මේ මගුල් ඛෙරයට යොÞඇත්තේ හරක් හම සහා හරක් බොකුයි. එසේනම් ගව ඝාතනයට එරෙහිවන මේ පිරිසට මේවා සුභවුනේ කෙසේද?එසේනම් මෙහි දී මොවුන්ගේ පටු වු අරමුණු පැහැදිලිය.

For your information, u dont have to kill a cow to get the skin or any other part. if u didnt knw a large propotion of cows die due to natural causes n by the age

 

[smallvilleclerk50]

BECAUSE IT IS NOT HEALTHY....Pigs flesh is toxic

Please dont lie. Dont show your stupidity here typing assumptions. If pig flesh is toxic, beef is 10 times toxic than it, these were already answered with VALID recent scientific proof in religious section

BECAUSE PPL HAVE COMMON SENSE....the quran specifically says about Pig and dog meat....and some about fish...other animals are not specifically said....coz if that goes on most of the Quran would be about animals and food...so left to common sense...if you doesn't have the common sense not to eat a cockroach its your funeral...

Some countries , people eat dog flesh for generations,Still they live healthier life, some eat cockroaches, beetles, and other pests, if you have common sense you should have understand that what quran say is baseless

BECAUSE IT IS MORE HEALTHY....meaning dirt and viruses doesn't get under the foreskin and cause unnecessary infections....

Another lie. once in 1950s a research sed so, but after in 1980 scientists found it was wrong Again quran is wrong

these are Islam's reasons' which i have already given...along with valid modern day medical sites validating the same claims....

Which modern day medical site says so? (except zakir nayik's site)

anything else?....or is this magically not clear?...or unacceptable answers?...that is what ppl who don't want to accept answers say....

Totally unacceptable. first learn, quran teaches you that you are made of clay, but i guess you have gray matter in your brain, so make use of it.

 

[Tom Riddle]

BECAUSE IT IS NOT HEALTHY....Pigs flesh is toxic

BECAUSE PPL HAVE COMMON SENSE....the quran specifically says about Pig and dog meat....and some about fish...other animals are not specifically said....coz if that goes on most of the Quran would be about animals and food...so left to common sense...if you doesn't have the common sense not to eat a cockroach its your funeral...

BECAUSE IT IS MORE HEALTHY....meaning dirt and viruses doesn't get under the foreskin and cause unnecessary infections....

these are Islam's reasons' which i have already given...along with valid modern day medical sites validating the same claims....

anything else?....or is this magically not clear?...or unacceptable answers?...that is what ppl who don't want to accept answers say....

So you want us to accept anything you say, even if you have no way to prove that it is right?

Not going to happen, as we are not blinded.

So the common sense of people is limited to not figuring out that the Pig is a dirty animal?

And you can eat cockroaches and other creepy crawlies and live happily. They are also supposed to be tasty and crunchy. More ignorance on your part. I could quote references, but then again they would just be 'copy pasted', right?

Now how long is the Quran? 3 pages. I don't think so. So why couldn't it include some other creatures as well? It wouldn't be all about animals if it had about 2 pages of animals unworthy of consumption, right?

So why is the Quran so concerned about personal hygiene? Does it say how to properly brush your teeth, how to properly wash, to avoid oily foods? Cos of it says to do things because it is healthy, it should not gloss over these vital facts.

I don't know, but it seems to me that you are covering up the real reasons why the Quran forbids these things.

 

[Tom Riddle]

BECAUSE IT IS NOT HEALTHY....Pigs flesh is toxic

BECAUSE PPL HAVE COMMON SENSE....the quran specifically says about Pig and dog meat....and some about fish...other animals are not specifically said....coz if that goes on most of the Quran would be about animals and food...so left to common sense...if you doesn't have the common sense not to eat a cockroach its your funeral...

BECAUSE IT IS MORE HEALTHY....meaning dirt and viruses doesn't get under the foreskin and cause unnecessary infections....

these are Islam's reasons' which i have already given...along with valid modern day medical sites validating the same claims....

anything else?....or is this magically not clear?...or unacceptable answers?...that is what ppl who don't want to accept answers say....

So you want us to accept anything you say, even if you have no way to prove that it is right?

Not going to happen, as we are not blinded.

So the common sense of people is so limited so that they can't figure out that the Pig is a dirty animal?

And you can eat cockroaches and other creepy crawlies and live happily. They are also supposed to be tasty and crunchy. More ignorance on your part. I could quote references, but then again they would just be 'copy pasted', right?

Now how long is the Quran? 3 pages. I don't think so. So why couldn't it include some other creatures as well? It wouldn't be all about animals if it had about 2 pages of animals unworthy of consumption, right?

So why is the Quran so concerned about personal hygiene? Does it say how to properly brush your teeth, how to properly wash, to avoid oily foods? Cos of it says to do things because it is healthy, it should not gloss over these vital facts.

I don't know, but it seems to me that you are covering up the real reasons why the Quran forbids these things.

 

[smallvilleclerk50]

For your information, u dont have to kill a cow to get the skin or any other part. if u didnt knw a large propotion of cows die due to natural causes n by the age

අරාබියේ නම් නැචුරල් කෝසස් නිසා හරකෙක්ට මැරෙන්න හම්බෙන්නේ නැතිලු නේ

 

[Tom Riddle]

lol....bitter much....

i didn't really read any of your posts really...coz i know the kind of sites you pull that out of.....

atleast i don't pretend to be smarter....

seriously and honest to God....i have never met vegetable cases like some ppl here.....before in any forum i have been to....even stupid french had smarter responses than you....

if only you guys wanted to learn and actually read my posts with at least a shred of common sense....

the only people who behaved worse were Indians....didn't expect this from sri lankans....especially Buddhist at that....

We do read them with common sense. That is the very reason why we don't accept them.

You mean sites that are non-muslim? Ah yes you don't believe anything that is non-muslim, do you, no matter how much of proof is staring at you in the face?

And nice reaction. You made out you were thinking about that the whole time. About the most cleverest thing you've done.

You don't pretend to be smarter. LMAO. You say in the SAME POST that there are 'vegetable cases' here. Now that is lunacy unheard of. Contradicting yourself in the same post

People don't accept things because someone says so. Especially Buddhists. Maybe that's why you think they are stupid.

Because anyone who does not agree with you MUST be stupid, right?

 

[diamonddrago]

So you want us to accept anything you say, even if you have no way to prove that it is right?

Not going to happen, as we are not blinded.

So the common sense of people is limited to not figuring out that the Pig is a dirty animal?

And you can eat cockroaches and other creepy crawlies and live happily. They are also supposed to be tasty and crunchy. More ignorance on your part. I could quote references, but then again they would just be 'copy pasted', right?

Now how long is the Quran? 3 pages. I don't think so. So why couldn't it include some other creatures as well? It wouldn't be all about animals if it had about 2 pages of animals unworthy of consumption, right?

So why is the Quran so concerned about personal hygiene? Does it say how to properly brush your teeth, how to properly wash, to avoid oily foods? Cos of it says to do things because it is healthy, it should not gloss over these vital facts.

I don't know, but it seems to me that you are covering up the real reasons why the Quran forbids these things.

i didn't prove it?....

didn't i give you a link about pig meat done by a christian site...?

didn't i give you a link about circumcision done by an Indian American doctor...?

you want the quran...to list every living creature...and say if its ok to eat or not?......seriously?....

and yes the Quran is very concerned about personal hygiene....its says to brush our teeth before taking ablution for prayer....and it says to cut finger nails properly and keep it short....its says not to grow hair too long or it will be tangled (for men).....a lot of things like that...but of course you ppl only see the "evil Quran"......

and i am not covering up anything....

why should i?.....

ask me a question regarding the Quran...and tell me you can't believe it coz its from the Quran.......i don't know when you started laughing...but i have been doing that a long time before i started this thread....

 

[Tom Riddle]

i didn't prove it?....

didn't i give you a link about pig meat done by a christian site...?

didn't i give you a link about circumcision done by an Indian American doctor...?

you want the quran...to list every living creature...and say if its ok to eat or not?......seriously?....

and yes the Quran is very concerned about personal hygiene....its says to brush our teeth before taking ablution for prayer....and it says to cut finger nails properly and keep it short....its says not to grow hair too long or it will be tangled (for men).....a lot of things like that...but of course you ppl only see the "evil Quran"......

and i am not covering up anything....

why should i?.....

ask me a question regarding the Quran...and tell me you can't believe it coz its from the Quran.......i don't know when you started laughing...but i have been doing that a long time before i started this thread....

That site proved nothing. And anyway, I have never heard any medical practitioner cautioning eating pork. People eat pork in great quantities everywhere in the world, and don't have problems.


Dodging and dodging again. No I don't want the Quran to list every single creature. I want it to at least pay some attention to the common ones (like the crow). So that people who go by solely by the Quran (hint hint) will not eat them.

Now how could the ominpresent crow have been left out?

and yes the Quran is very concerned about personal hygiene....its says to brush our teeth before taking ablution for prayer....and it says to cut finger nails properly and keep it short....its says not to grow hair too long or it will be tangled (for men).....a lot of things like that...but of course you ppl only see the "evil Quran"......[/B]

Why can't you answer directly like this in your replies?
But anyway, I doubt that the Quran is as comprehensive and accurate than modern Medical manuals.

And don't jump the gun like you always do. I said 'doubt', because I don't come to baseless conclusions.

Isn't there a story about the pig not going to a party of Allah's and that is why people are forbidden to eat pork?

 

[Tom Riddle]

And another thing, I seem to be bumping this thread by replying to you. As one wise friend stated earlier, I too will quit (for the time being anyway) trying to drive some sense into your brain.

You are quite free to mock me and use smilies liberally. Feel free to act like a child and insult me in my absence, because you are incapable of doing it effectively when I'm around.

 

[diamonddrago]

Please dont lie. Dont show your stupidity here typing assumptions. If pig flesh is toxic, beef is 10 times toxic than it, these were already answered with VALID recent scientific proof in religious section


Some countries , people eat dog flesh for generations,Still they live healthier life, some eat cockroaches, beetles, and other pests, if you have common sense you should have understand that what quran say is baseless

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/935861/reasons_why_you_shouldnt_eat_pork.html

http://www.ensignmessage.com/archives/porkfacts.html

http://www.ultimatehealthsolutions.com.au/tohealth.html


what does those say?.....

Another lie. once in 1950s a research sed so, but after in 1980 scientists found it was wrong Again quran is wrong

what about this....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Medical_aspects

"Over forty observational studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between circumcision and HIV infection.[154] Reviews of these studies have reached differing conclusions about whether circumcision could be used as a prevention method against HIV.[155][156][157][158]
Experimental evidence was needed to establish a causal relationship between lack of circumcision and HIV, so three randomized controlled trialsconfounding factors.[158] Trials took place in South Africa,[159] Kenya[160] and Uganda.[161] All three trials were stopped early by their monitoring boards on ethical grounds, because those in the circumcised group had a lower rate of HIV contraction than the control group.[160] The results showed that circumcision reduced vaginal-to-penile transmission of HIV by 60%, 53%, and 51%, respectively.[162] A meta-analysis of the African randomised controlled trials found that the risk in circumcised males was 0.44 times that in uncircumcised males, and that 72 circumcisions would need to be performed to prevent one HIV infection. The authors also stated that using circumcision as a means to reduce HIV infection would, on a national level, require consistently safe sexual practices to maintain the protective benefit.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-162"


Just because you refuse to use your common sense nor research into my posts......don't blame the quran....that is what lazy racists do....

if i am wrong...don't say it...prove me wrong....unconditionally....