LASANTHA -LAST EDITORIAL( EVIDENCE HE SUPPORT TAMIL EEELAM)

Nash_Node

Well-known member
  • Apr 2, 2008
    2,962
    150
    63
    Staring at my laptop
    kamalmawa said:
    You never had a proper reply to the points that I showed... So is that means u agree that you support LTTE ?


    I take it as that you are too stupid to understand the answers I have given you:lol:

    I have answered you absolutely TO THE POINT, can't help you being retard though
     

    kamalmawa

    Member
    Sep 9, 2008
    574
    1
    0
    Melbourne
    Nash_Node said:
    Check the Phantomzone reply below.

    That pretty much answers the question for you :rolleyes:

    Its you who only looks at one side.. which is you agree whatever UNP politicians says and LTTE followers says to get rid of this gov so one can gain the power and others can save LTTE ...
     
    Last edited:

    Nash_Node

    Well-known member
  • Apr 2, 2008
    2,962
    150
    63
    Staring at my laptop
    kamalmawa said:
    Its you who only looks at one side.. which is you agree whatever UNP politicians says and LTTE followers says to get rid of this gov so one can gain the power and others can save LTTE ...

    BashHead.gif
    wrong wrong.... so so very wrong. DAMN !!!!

    When the HECK did I say I support UNP or the LTTE...

    Yet another stupendous assumptions of yours !!

    Just because I DO NOT conform with the ideologies of the Government .. I do not become a UNP or a LTTE !

    It makes me a liberal person with my own free ideas rather than a blind follower of a view which is forced down our throats by the government propaganda.


    whack.gif
    S.T.U.P.I.D
    whack.gif
     

    kamalmawa

    Member
    Sep 9, 2008
    574
    1
    0
    Melbourne
    Nash_Node said:
    BashHead.gif
    wrong wrong.... so so very wrong. DAMN !!!!

    When the HECK did I say I support UNP or the LTTE...

    Yet another stupendous assumptions of yours !!

    Just because I DO NOT conform with the ideologies of the Government .. I do not become a UNP or a LTTE !

    It makes me a liberal person with my own free ideas rather than a blind follower of a view which is forced down our throats by the government propaganda.


    whack.gif
    S.T.U.P.I.D
    whack.gif

    I gave you lot of reasons why you should backed up this gov at least another few years... Specially on LTTE problem... Tell me why don't you... ?
     

    Nash_Node

    Well-known member
  • Apr 2, 2008
    2,962
    150
    63
    Staring at my laptop
    kamalmawa said:
    I gave you lot of reasons why you should backed up this gov at least another few years... Specially on LTTE problem... Tell me why don't you... ?

    Reason

    another reason

    One more

    May be the links I gave doesn't give you an answer for your satisfaction.. so

    Let be known firm and solid.

    I do not support ANY GOVERNMENT or any POLITICAL PARY who encourage WAR ! .. and it goes far into the Individuals as well.... simply.. I do not support ANYONE who supports the war.

    I value Life and Humanity. I do not have hatred or racism in my heart.

    No matter how and which way you put it or brand me.... I can't help it... I do not support war
     

    WAR!!!!!!!

    Member
    Mar 3, 2008
    110
    1
    0
    Nash_Node said:
    BashHead.gif
    wrong wrong.... so so very wrong. DAMN !!!!

    When the HECK did I say I support UNP or the LTTE...

    Yet another stupendous assumptions of yours !!

    Just because I DO NOT conform with the ideologies of the Government .. I do not become a UNP or a LTTE !

    It makes me a liberal person with my own free ideas rather than a blind follower of a view which is forced down our throats by the government propaganda.


    whack.gif
    S.T.U.P.I.D
    whack.gif
    Lasantha Wickramatunga was more a politician than a journalist or a lawyer. No journalist is unbiased, in fact no individual is unbiased and Wickramatunga was biased to the core. He had political ambitions and his writings were definitely pro UNP, pro Tamil racism, anti SLFP though he may have had been a private secretary of Mrs. Bandaranaike long time ago. He was not the best investigative journalist we have had as information came to him rather than him going after information. When one reads the gossip columns that are published under the pretext of political commentary, political analysis etc., it could be easily seen that the sources of these columns are more or less the same. Of course some gossip columnists have more "resource persons" (a term used in middleclass seminar circuit to mislead the gullible people), and their columns are more popular. In Sri Lanka at present anybody with good contacts and a telephone could become an investigative journalist, provided of course he has a flavour for journalism and a place to present his "findings". Let us face the facts, though they are not sacrosanct as some people tend to believe. Lasantha Wickramatunga as a UNP politician had access to anti government and in particular anti Rajapakshe family material than most of the others who authored gossip columns. I am not trying to find fault with a dead man, but I am only exposing the middleclass that has lost the leadership that they had in the society.

    Then we have the so called last editorial. One does not have to be an investigative journalist to see through the last editorial. The last editorial is not the last supper, and only the gullible would believe that it was written before the assassination. Wickramatunga was just an ordinary politician, and the middleclass however much it tries cannot make him a hero who sacrificed his life for truth. However, this does not imply that I condone the assassination. Finally it was a sacrificial of a life for intended political gains without achieving anything. Those who finally suffer are his three children and their mother and not the "heroic" middleclass that write eulogies that will help to boost up their frustrated egos, nor the free media people who enjoy life on funds provided by the west.

    Who won the so called war? We have right throughout maintained that there was no war in the country and it was only a case of defeating a gang of terrorists who had taken up arms against the government. If one calls the operations against the LTTE a war then one has to state that we have had two wars against the JVP. Operations are not called wars depending on the number of days of fighting or the number of bunkers or even the foreign aid given to the armed gang directly by the western embassies or indirectly by them through the NGOs and INGOs, and conceptually there had been no war in this country. In any event, the operations against the LTTE have been successful and we may ask, on behalf of the middleclass who won the operations.

    The operations were won by the armed forces under the military leadership provided by the commanders of the armed forces, under the leadership given by the secretary of the ministry of defence, and under the political leadership of the President with the support of the majority of the public, and of course with the help given by the opinion leaders of the nationalist movement who had maintained that the terrorist outfit can be and should be defeated against the tide created by the NGOs, INGOs, the war pundits, ambassadors and special envoys, missionaries, Solheims who claimed that Prabhakaran was a military genius who could not be defeated. If anyone of the above conditions or factors was missing the operations would not have succeeded, and I would say that the operations would not have even begun if not for the political leadership provided by the President. Thus the most crucial factor is the political leadership and due credit has to be given to the President irrespective of the wishes of the middleclass. If the President bowed down to pressure from the western powers, then that would have been the end of the operations. The President also was able to win the confidence of the Indian government by assuring them that Sri Lanka would not act in a way that would pause a threat to India, directly or indirectly. Few years ago when we first raised the issue of the political leadership some pundits in the so called alternative (vikalpa) press ridiculed us and wanted to know whether we advocated pollicising the armed forces. However, now everybody is talking of the political leadership provided by the President and it is clear that without him no victory was possible.




    this artical written by prof. nalin de silva and this is the truth, idiots like you not willing to accept due to so called balance(two side) view.we stand to promote the right view, not the balance view.:frown:
     

    R_L

    Well-known member
  • Jan 21, 2007
    3,064
    46
    48
    Colombo
    WAR!!!!!!! said:

    Who won the so called war? We have right throughout maintained that there was no war in the country and it was only a case of defeating a gang of terrorists who had taken up arms against the government. If one calls the operations against the LTTE a war then one has to state that we have had two wars against the JVP. Operations are not called wars depending on the number of days of fighting or the number of bunkers or even the foreign aid given to the armed gang directly by the western embassies or indirectly by them through the NGOs and INGOs, and conceptually there had been no war in this country. In any event, the operations against the LTTE have been successful and we may ask, on behalf of the middleclass who won the operations.


    War is the reciprocal and violent application of force between hostile political entities aimed at bringing about a desired political end-state via armed conflict.

    War is an interaction in which two or more militaries have a “struggle of wills”.

    When qualified as a civil war, it is a dispute inherent to a given society, and its nature is in the conflict over modes of governance rather than sovereignty.

    War is not considered to be the same as occupation, murder, or genocide because of the reciprocal nature of the violent struggle, and the organized nature of the units involved.

    Conventional warfare is an attempt to reduce an opponent's military capability through open battle. It is a declared war between existing states in which nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons are not used or only see limited deployment in support of conventional military goals and maneuvers.

    The opposite of conventional warfare, unconventional warfare, is an attempt to achieve military victory through acquiescence, capitulation, or clandestine support for one side of an existing conflict using non-traditional means.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War

    CHECK BEFORE SAYIN... DNT WANT TO GO INTO EACH AN EVRY DETAIL U HAVE POSTD COS ITS AN UTTER WASTE OF TIME AN SERVER SPACE ALSO... U BELIV WAT U WANT.. BUT REMMBR.. LANKAWE MINISSUNTA DAWASAKA THERENA KOTA.. KAL GIHIN WEDI WEIDA DANNE NEHE... YUDDEYAK KIYANA EKE THERUMA DANNE NETHI AYATA KOHOMATH MEWA THERENNE NEHE.. :no: :no: :( :( :(
     

    Nash_Node

    Well-known member
  • Apr 2, 2008
    2,962
    150
    63
    Staring at my laptop
    WAR!!!!!!! said:


    this artical written by prof. nalin de silva and this is the truth, idiots like you not willing to accept due to so called balance(two side) view.we stand to promote the right view, not the balance view.:frown:

    So you want me to believe that this is a totally unbiased view ? :lol:

    may be I SHOULD remind you that Prof. Nalin De Silva is a leading politician in the "Lanka sama smaja pakshaya" & the "nawa samasaaja pakashaya" .....

    which "ironically" was a part of the UPFA in 2004 General election supporting "Mahinda Chinthanaya"

    So is this is an Un-Biased view of just a case of "birds of the feather flock together" ??? :lol::lol:
     

    kamalmawa

    Member
    Sep 9, 2008
    574
    1
    0
    Melbourne
    Nash_Node said:
    Reason

    another reason

    One more

    May be the links I gave doesn't give you an answer for your satisfaction.. so

    Let be known firm and solid.

    I do not support ANY GOVERNMENT or any POLITICAL PARY who encourage WAR ! .. and it goes far into the Individuals as well.... simply.. I do not support ANYONE who supports the war.

    I value Life and Humanity. I do not have hatred or racism in my heart.

    No matter how and which way you put it or brand me.... I can't help it... I do not support war

    Then you should start protesting against LTTE first. Which I haven't seeing much you do same as Lasantha did...
     

    Nash_Node

    Well-known member
  • Apr 2, 2008
    2,962
    150
    63
    Staring at my laptop
    kamalmawa said:
    Then you should start protesting against LTTE first. Which I haven't seeing much you do same as Lasantha did...

    You sir.... you are simply hopeless !

    I just don't know how to answer you...seriously.

    I don't know how to TALK the language of people without common sense !
     

    WAR!!!!!!!

    Member
    Mar 3, 2008
    110
    1
    0
    Nash_Node said:
    So you want me to believe that this is a totally unbiased view ? :lol:

    may be I SHOULD remind you that Prof. Nalin De Silva is a leading politician in the "Lanka sama smaja pakshaya" & the "nawa samasaaja pakashaya" .....

    which "ironically" was a part of the UPFA in 2004 General election supporting "Mahinda Chinthanaya"

    So is this is an Un-Biased view of just a case of "birds of the feather flock together" ??? :lol::lol:

    i never said this is an unbiased view, but this exactly explain my opinion regarding lasantha and war aginst ltte. mahinda finishing this war'' by hook or by crook'' and amount of money and number of death count will not be a matter, cos we have a duty to protect this sri lanka for our next generation. :love:
     

    jothipala

    Member
    Jan 13, 2009
    4
    0
    0
    Sri Lanka and India
    Lasantha Last Editorial

    I published this article so that people can understand the very powerful underlining message in this. I am so bloody shamed and sorry that most of the pricks who read this got the wrong en of the stick. Some have gone crazy over some ethnic shit. Some have gone overboard with terrorism and saying that the article is in support to the LTTE. Bloody morons!!!. Only two people have attempted to understand the core message of the article. No wonder Lasantha was shot dead. Because majority of the assholes who read the bloody papers can't understand what they read or they sit on their fricking brains so much that it has reduced to a dam pulp. This is th freking problem with our Sri Lankans. No bugger can understand the other bugger. You can have your opinion man, anyone can express their opinion. Opinions are like assholes, everyone has got one.

    I am not going to spell out the message in the article, you assholes don't want to know. But it is not about LTTE, it is not about a particular society, ethnicity or a political group. IT IS ALL ABOUT YOU!!!!

    God save Sri Lanka with this kind of morons around.. Same man, dam shame…
     

    jothipala

    Member
    Jan 13, 2009
    4
    0
    0
    Sri Lanka and India
    The Pepople who write against

    I don’t want to undermine the bravery, courage, the will power backed by the strategy and planning of the Sri Lankan armed forces against the militants called the LTTE. I don’t consider them as the people who represent the aspirations of Tamil community in Sri Lanka. If you read carefully the history of the militant movement in the north, you can draw many parallels with the militants that led a short-term arms struggle in the south.
    What matters in the future is not that you won a war, but how you won it. And with that process the sacrifices the country made on both sides. But among the stories that will be written, the story of journalist who exposed corruption, malice and all other wises of both sides and paid by their lives will be taking a prominence.