Post Hard disk transfer rates

rajithakodagoda

Junior member
  • Sep 13, 2006
    754
    2
    18
    Where Any Human Being Can Live
    SAMSUNG SP1644N (160GB IDE 7200RPM/2MB)

    39164912nn7.jpg
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    shanX said:
    Is dis on Vista? Or XP - Native SATA mode?
    XP ne. Can't you see that from the screenshot?
    Anyway, the "mode" will not change the transfer rate graph.

    I still can't believe how the 250HJ beats the 252HJ :confused:
     
    May 5, 2007
    3,234
    6
    0
    Space
    Anusha said:
    XP ne. Can't you see that from the screenshot?
    Anyway, the "mode" will not change the transfer rate graph.

    I still can't believe how the 250HJ beats the 252HJ :confused:

    :yes: may be coz of my fockin cpu, may be the nvidia chipset doesnt support well,
    bt still the minimum rate n access time remains higher in 252hj, reading speeds are stable
    i hope to buy another 252hj soon, its really cheap too.
     
    Last edited:

    zCexVe

    Active member
  • Sep 12, 2006
    8,550
    22
    38
    Where I'm now
    Anusha said:
    I still can't believe how the 250HJ beats the 252HJ :confused:
    AFAIK he has a nVIDIA chipset.With nVIDIA chipsets harddisk transfer rates are lower compared to other.No matter what you do they have lower transfer rates.One drawback in nVIDIA chipsets.
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    Sasika@Elakiri said:
    :yes: may be coz of my fockin cpu, may be the nvidia chipset doesnt support well,
    bt still the minimum rate n access time remains higher in 252hj, reading speeds are stable
    i hope to buy another 252hj soon, its really cheap too.
    Don't compare with KZRO's screenshot.
    Compare it with this.
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    zCexVe said:
    AFAIK he has a nVIDIA chipset.With nVIDIA chipsets harddisk transfer rates are lower compared to other.No matter what you do they have lower transfer rates.One drawback in nVIDIA chipsets.
    But it doesn't explain how his Burst rate is slower than max read speed? :/
     

    fallenzeraphine

    Active member
  • Jan 29, 2008
    1,385
    9
    38
    damn i havent posted mine here, nwayz, the HD250HJ scores 105~108 MBps Maximum Read speed, 68~70 MBps Minimum read speed, Burst Rate is 215~150MBps (its 200s on the Jmicron Controller) this is on ICH9 southbridge, ofcource Depending on the SATA controller, but very slightly, Burstrate can go really bonkers but other rates stay very close what i achived here all the time, look at Anushas and Gayans screenies, ur Transfer rates look pretty weird indeed sasika, 40ish minimum is not that good, and ur burst rate is really bonkers mate...u should stick the HDD on another PC and check it maybe its defective. plus the Curve should be pretty smooth, but look at urs its spiking every few seconds, KZRO's is worse must be sumthing with the controller
     
    Last edited:

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    fallenzeraphine said:
    damn i havent posted mine here, nwayz, the HD250HJ scores 105~108 MBps Maximum Read speed, 68~70 MBps Minimum read speed, Burst Rate is 215~150MBps (its 200s on the Jmicron Controller) this is on ICH9 southbridge, ofcource Depending on the SATA controller, but very slightly, Burstrate can go really bonkers but other rates stay very close what i achived here all the time, look at Anushas and Gayans screenies, ur Transfer rates look pretty weird indeed sasika, 40ish minimum is not that good, and ur burst rate is really bonkers mate...u should stick the HDD on another PC and check it maybe its defective. plus the Curve should be pretty smooth, but look at urs its spiking every few seconds, KZRO's is worse must be sumthing with the controller
    No no that transfer rate graph is correct. Just the values are a little lower than I expected.
     
    Last edited:

    fallenzeraphine

    Active member
  • Jan 29, 2008
    1,385
    9
    38
    Anusha said:
    No no that transfer rate graph is correct. Just the values are a little ;pwer than I expected.

    meh really? on mine it doesnt spike like this..look at gayans one its pretty smooth also hummz
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    fallenzeraphine said:
    meh really? on mine it doesnt spike like this..look at gayans one its pretty smooth also hummz
    every drive is different men. F1's work give that sort of graph.