Radeon HD 4870 X2, HD 4850 X2 Faster and Better Than GeForce GTX 295, 285: AMD

[gayannr]

So nVidia getting down with 8X AA ne...?

i think Older 4870X2 is doing a great job for money...
ATI will first with 40nm one & they will give another awesome X2 guy

Kinda true!

 

[Intel_Nehalem]

hey guys can u see all games are running under 2560 X 1600 with 8X AA & 16X AF

yes and the GTX295 looses because it is limited by memory
If it had the same amount of memory then the GTx295 would have beat it at that resolution?

I want to ask you a question
Do most gamers play with those settings? 2560x1600 8xAA 16xAF
Most people play with 1920x1200, 1680x1050 and at 1280x720/1280x1024 and at those resoultions, the GTx 295 is the best for them

 

[gayannr]

Yeah might be....
But ATI will first with 40nm no...?

ATi already has a 40nm card under their hood.. not a flagship one though

 

[Bigspin]

it is true that the hd4870x2 is cheaper than the GTX295 and offers identical performance but the GTX300 series will be an ATI killer with DX11 support, GDDR5,2GB RAM and MIMD based cores

he he....That's what you guys said before ATI HD4XXX launch...

ATI card perform better when it come to hi resolution+AA due to it's memory capacity

Anyway don't put Guru3D charts. They are always faver nVIDIA. I checked both models @ UK PcWorld with high resolution+8xAA enabled . Nvidia can't beat ATI.

Now don't say 8xAA is not important,When you pay $500 for graphic card it want to be a best performer with all settings enabled

 

[Intel_Nehalem]

ATi already has a 40nm card under their hood.. not a flagship one though

is it the RV740?

 

[Intel_Nehalem]

[/b]

he he....That's what you guys said before ATI HD4XXX launch...

ATI card perform better when it come to hi resolution+AA due to it's memory capacity

Anyway don't put Guru3D charts. They are always faver nVIDIA. I checked both models @ UK PcWorld with high resolution+8xAA enabled . Nvidia can't beat ATI.

Now don't say 8xAA is not important,When you pay $500 for graphic card it want to be a best performer with all settings enabled

look at this
http://www.techpowerup.com/82322/GT300_A_Leap_Forward_for_NVIDIA_GPU_Architecture.html

 

[gayannr]

yes and the GTX295 looses because it is limited by memory
If it had the same amount of memory then the GTx295 would have beat it at that resolution?

meh! don't talk rubbish
It's a limitation of the GTX260 memory bus,, can't help..

I want to ask you a question
Do most gamers play with those settings? 2560x1600 8xAA 16xAF
Most people play with 1920x1200, 1680x1050 and at 1280x720/1280x1024 and at those resoultions, the GTx 295 is the best for them

These cards are for ultra high end systems,
not for the 1680x , 1280x resolutions,, So these cards must target 2650x1600, and with full AA and AF of course..

 

[Bigspin]

is it the RV740?

40nm ATI HD4670 according to the reports

 

[Bigspin]

meh! don't talk rubbish
It's a limitation of the GTX260 memory bus,, can't help..


These cards are for ultra high end systems,
nor for the 1680x , 1280x resolutions,, So these cards must target 2650x1600, and with full AA and AFof course..

Yes. Who want to play @ 1280x1024 res when you have $500 VGA card

 

[Intel_Nehalem]

meh! don't talk rubbish
It's a limitation of the GTX260 memory bus,, can't help..


These cards are for ultra high end systems,
nor for the 1680x , 1280x resolutions,, So these cards must target 2650x1600, and with full AA and AFof course..

I know that its limited by the GTX260 mem. bus
so don't you think that ultra high end consumers would quad sli or quad crossfirex? They want to get the best performance that is possible
And afaik SLi scales better than crossfire

 

[Bigspin]

look at this
http://www.techpowerup.com/82322/GT300_A_Leap_Forward_for_NVIDIA_GPU_Architecture.html

We'll see bro We'll see..... I'm not day dreaming for VGA cards.

 

[Intel_Nehalem]

Yes. Who want to play @ 1280x1024 res when you have $500 VGA card

yeah! but there are some people

 

[Bigspin]

yeah! but there are some people

Yes...maybe in Sri Lanka

 

[gayannr]

yeah! but there are some people

yeah n00bs

 

[Intel_Nehalem]

yeah n00bs

bro look at this thread
http://www.elakiri.com/forum/showthread.php?t=142493

 

[gayannr]

I know that its limited by the GTX260 mem. bus
so don't you think that ultra high end consumers would quad sli or quad crossfirex? They want to get the best performance that is possible
And afaik SLi scales better than crossfire

Anyways these cards are highly capable of the max res with AA and AF for current games.. I don't see any point going with quad setups at the moment... (Well,,, Crysis is an exception )

 

[gayannr]

bro look at this thread
http://www.elakiri.com/forum/showthread.php?t=142493

mage bandwidth panala,, next month thamai

 

[Bigspin]

Anyways these cards are highly capable of the max res with AA and AF for current games.. I don't see any point going with quad setups at the moment... (Well,,, Crysis is an exception )

Crysis is not a well optimised game...Actually it's optimised for nVIDIA (Except Warhead which perform better than first title with every hardware)

nVIDIA paid $4+ millions to get that optimised for nVIDIA right

 

[Intel_Nehalem]

mage bandwidth panala,, next month thamai

 

[gayannr]

Crysis is not a well optimised game...Actually it's optimised for nVIDIA (Except Warhead which perform better than first title with every hardware)

nVIDIA paid $4+ millions to get that optimised for nVIDIA right

Love to see ATi logo in a game
ATi : meant to be played